The State have decided that they will support people over 18 (if they do not continue their education), that indeed it is no longer entirely the responsibility of their parents. At what age would you stop supporting them if they are unable to find work? 25? 35? Never?
I have no intention of supporting my child to sit around for years, out of work, doing nothing.
They don’t sit around doing nothing just now. It’s just not an option.
Just like benefits aren’t an option.
I wouldn’t financially be supporting them to rot, and I certainly won’t be introducing them to a system that financially supports people to rot.
I grew up in an incredibly deprived area of the country. I’ve seen first hand what benefits can do to people.
When we speak about their future, getting a job after school or claiming benefits isn’t something that has ever been discussed. Why would it be? It is just not an option,
They are fully aware that the expectation is that they continue their education, and I intend on supporting them financially through that.
Their father and I have modelled a strong work ethic, and they are absolutely expected to undertake some form of part time work as soon as they are able to. Again, it’s just not something that is optional.
I cannot fathom why anyone would teach their children about benefits, or allow their child to view benefits as an option available to them. It is so depressing.
I cannot believe how normalised claiming benefits has become. All the comments about “being entitled to them” are shocking. My children may be privileged, but they are very much aware that they aren’t entitled to anything in life, and that they will need to work hard. I’m struggling to see what’s wrong with that?