@sixeightfivere the holiday, absolutely yes. Earlier this year I had a US trip planned. My DH couldn’t afford it, so he said he wouldn’t go. He was fine with that. As it happened, things changed and he managed to come along.
For June just gone, we discussed a summer holiday. He wanted to invest in a course for his career and couldn’t afford both, so he chose the course. I went ahead and did a semi-solo trip, which I loved.
Next year I have booked myself an ultra-luxury resort as a treat. When booking, I saw it was not much extra to add him, so I asked if he wanted to come. He is joining me, as my treat.
He has also travelled without me before because I chose to spend my money on other priorities. If it is a joint holiday we have agreed on, we always cover each other, no questions asked, if one could not afford it.
As for the split, I would never put myself in a position where I earned so little that I could not sustain my own lifestyle. I do not want to ask my husband for permission to buy myself something. That level of dependence is not partnership, it is financial control. If a woman cannot even buy herself a £20 pair of trousers without approval, she has handed over her independence.
To me, being partners is not about merging every penny. It is about respecting each other’s autonomy while choosing to share a life. Even if I earned £100k more than him or the other way around, we would still keep separate finances. Bills will always be 50/50, but we use our extra money to treat each other and pay for the fun things like meals, days out or holidays.
Flatmates split bills because they have to. We split bills because we choose to. That is not flatmates, that is equality. And if you think financial dependence equals love, that says more about your relationship than mine.