Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Unequal home ownership - grateful for any advice!

88 replies

OnThisHarvestMoon · 07/01/2025 05:46

My husband and I are thinking of buying a house together. We currently live in the flat that he owns but it's too small now we also have a child.

I also own a flat that is currently being rented; it’s a lot less valuable than his: worth less than half.

We plan to sell both flats to buy our forever family home.

His family have very generously offered to help us buy a place, but they want any money they contribute plus the money he puts in from the sale of his own flat (they originally purchased it for him) ringfenced with a Tenancy in Common agreement whereby I am only entitled to the exact amount I put in (and the corresponding percentage of interest if it accrues value) if the property is ever sold. They also want us to buy in a particular, and very expensive, area as a condition of contributing the money. I think I would end up owning about a fifth of the property.

I don’t know how to feel about this. On the one hand, I can absolutely understand their desire to protect their wealth and it’s completely fair. On the other hand, I’m struggling to get over how much less financial security I will have than my husband should our marriage ever end. (We really love each other and have a strong and honest relationship, so I’m not expecting this to happen, but then who is?)

I am feeling extremely financially insecure as my career (and self esteem) has taken a big hit post maternity leave as I’ve struggled to find steady work (I freelance). I have mostly been living off my rental income (which I will obviously lose if we sell my flat to buy a family home as per the plan) with my husband covering our major expenses.

I also still look after my daughter one day a week and am the default caregiver any time she wakes in the night, there’s a nursery inset day or she’s off sick (which is a lot!). We are also talking about possibly having a second child, so I’m aware my earning potential might suffer more over the next few years, not least because I will be exhausted.

i think I’m also scared that our financial situations will get further and further apart and I’ll be constantly worried about how I can earn enough to give myself a decent safety net and/or that I won’t be able to keep up with the lifestyle my husband aspires to because I’ll be constantly trying to save!

The bills on a big house will be higher, as will the cost of living in the area his family wants us to buy. I also think I just don’t like the idea of owing only 1/5 of our family home. I guess I want to feel like equals and like a team and I also worry how I’d buy another home suitable for two children in this very expensive area (presuming they’d be at school there) if he ever left me.

It seems that with a Tenancy in Common agreement I also wouldn’t automatically get the house if my husband died, so I have a fear that should that if happened, my children and I could get kicked out of our family home if his parents decided to sell (I think this is very unlikely as they are good people, but it still makes me feel insecure).

Does anyone have any advice? Am I looking at this the wrong way? I want to feel happy and excited about the prospect of moving to a lovely new home together, but I just feel anxious and sad.

OP posts:
iamnotalemon · 08/01/2025 11:38

I don't see the problem with them wanting to ring fence the money they have invested but I don't think I'd be so keen on their help if it meant they wanted a choice in where you live etc.

Barrenfieldoffucks · 08/01/2025 11:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Yes, if the situations were the same with regards parenting and earning etc. Otherwise it is a bit of a thoughtless, strawman argument.

It would be controlling to dictate where a property is bought regardless.

Bigpaintinglittlepainting · 08/01/2025 11:50

Fuuuuuuuck that for a game of soldiers, don't you dare agree to that

comedia24 · 08/01/2025 12:04

A university or school fund for the children (with no strings on where they go) - even if that was invested in property that wasn't your main family home - would be a much less problematic idea.

Wonder if part of the issue is that you've realised or feel that your dh doesn't place much value on the primary caring you're doing. Could be a perception problem.

vivainsomnia · 08/01/2025 12:11

What a pointless dilemma! You're married. What's his is yours, what's yours is his. Unless you've only been living together less than 5 years, and even then, the deeds are irrelevant. Upon divorce, it wouldn't be looked at.

The only protection is in case of death. To protect you, make sure there is a will.

I am in a similar position than you except I will be keeping my house from before marriage. The joint house, which come with additional funds from his family will be under his name only as otherwise, I would have to pay taxes.

It doesn't matter at all. We've been married for more than 10 years. If we ever were to divorce, everything would be 50/50.

Blanketpolicy · 08/01/2025 12:24

OnThisHarvestMoon · 07/01/2025 21:06

@coldcallerbaiter honestly, I’m not sure I do want it. On the whole, I think I prefer owning 50:50 with my husband on a smaller property in the location of our choice and have expressed as much. My husband doesn’t see it this way, though. He is reluctant to turn down a big financial gift and the future benefits it could yield (which is obviously understandable!).

It is understandable from the point of view that he gets to live a nice house while not being put into a unfair financial position/without future security because mummy and daddy are protecting their baby.

It is not understandable that he would, or allow others to, undermine his or your marriage, put strings on your family decisions or put you in an unsecure or difficult position.

It will just complicate everything you do going forward. What happens if you decide to move home again, your family finances will need to pay for solicitors to protect him, what happens when you are planning your retirement plans, what happens if you want to remortgage and add an extension to the home and you pay for 1/2 the extension, what happens something significant happens to the home and needs your family finances to fix does that change how things are split if you now own 1/2 the new roof?

And his family will be sticking their nose in at every step to make sure he is making sure he and their gift is protected.

The split of the house financially with their gift will not represent the input you both give to your marriage and building a home, especially if you have maternity leave.

Madness, for you to even consider it and I'd be disappointed in my dh if he couldn't see that and let him family treat me like a lodger in their son life.

PhilomenaPunk · 08/01/2025 13:32

What I would love to know OP is if this approach is standard practice in his family. If he's from old money then usually it will be one of his parents who has brought the wealth into the family-did the other parent agree to this ridiculous set up?

If it's new money that's been created by his parents, if he has siblings, have their partners been expected to agree to such terms when setting up their own homes?

skipandwhistle · 08/01/2025 14:37

I gave my son a large amount of money (which I was fortunate enough to receive from an inheritance) which enabled him and his wife to buy a bigger more suitable house. I gave it as a gift, free and clear. Because if (and I hope this never happens) they do ever split up, at the end of the day, my DIL would still need to house my grand-daughter and ultimately I want the best for HER under any circumstances. So why would I restrict it to my son's benefit and potentially leave my DIL and GD high and dry? No way. It's money for their family, who I love, together or apart. I would be wondering why the PIL care so little for their grandchild that they would do this.

Needanewname42 · 08/01/2025 15:16

OnThisHarvestMoon · 07/01/2025 09:35

@NoSquirrels actually I believe Tenants in Common agreement is legally binding even if you are married. I.e. in the case of separation you both get back your pre agreed percentages.

My husband thinks this is a good deal for me. I get to live in a nicer house and we live mortgage free so I can save some of whatever I earn. My perspective is that he also is mortgage free and has the benefit of owning most of the house giving him ultimate control over where we live and greater financial security plus he has freedom to skyrocket his salary while he isn’t impacted by the limitations of having children.

It’s so frustrating because I don’t want his family’s extra money! I just want to feel an equal in our marriage and financially secure

Edited

'Nicer house' = big house = more spaces to get dirty = more cleaning and wife work!!!

Your right to be wary.

comedia24 · 08/01/2025 15:32

Not to mention your share of maintenance, council tax etc on a bigger house is going to be more as well. Are you paying 50 percent of that?

Totaleclipseofthemind · 08/01/2025 16:13

Your DH has never been weaned off his parents financially.

You will have to accept their control over him and you.

Not something I would like to live with in a marriage.

They don’t see you and never will.

OnThisHarvestMoon · 08/01/2025 20:22

@skipandwhistle yes, this is how I would view it too. I can’t see how an arrangement that could leave the mother of your grandchild in financial difficulty benefits anyone. If we didn’t have children, it would be totally different!

OP posts:
OnThisHarvestMoon · 08/01/2025 20:24

Thank you @comedia24 I am taking all these things into account.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page