Is that the free session where she submits a recording of the session for assessment by her coaching academy?
She’s been asked about how she handles confidentiality of a recording. She assures that the coaching academy listens to it and then deletes it - is she sure about that? In another conversation she has not responded to the question of whether recordings are anonymous. Given that Nurse is selling herself as more than a basic coach and therefore could potentially have very confidential things disclosed to her, the fact she is passing on recordings to a coaching academy, not obviously with personal details redacted, for a commercially motivated mindset/NWM oriented coaching outfit to pick over is a concern.
As we’ve seen Nurse is keen to wonder into clinical areas such as trauma, so what if someone discloses something in an identifiable recording that is then exploited and used to recruit them for further coaching or training? There are strict codes of practice around recordings and their “distribution” and use in supervision for a very good reason. Where is Nurse’s recall of the various mental health acts that she must be aware of? Why do these people think GDPR doesn’t apply to them?
What makes her think that having a “mindset coaching business” exempts her from responsibility if the shit hits the fan? She needs to be very careful about her responsibilities if it can be demonstrated that she was the uninsured, unethical practitioner involved when someone comes to harm. It does happen and she would be accountable. She isn’t protected by the NHS now.
Sorry, bit of a rant, I know it sounds dramatic. Her only insurance is that she doesn’t have clients as far as we know, but she might do and then what?