Saturation point is not something that is reached in a steady, even way.
Because of the nature of MLMs, market saturation is not reached when every potential gloop drinker is drinking gloop, but when there are no longer people around to be convinced to join.
The number of people who will not join has grown exponentially. Those most likely to join joined first. They have now left. With each cycle, the pool of potential recruits, not just in numbers, but in 'quality' (as in likely to be taken in by an MLM).
Multiplying this trend massively is the experience of those joiners (the vast majority now leavers). Their experience had been a negative one. They will share this with friends and family. Even if they quietly retire to lick their wounds, friends, family and those that they have interacted with (potential clients/prospects) will have been alerted to the noxious nature of the MLM- they, in turn, become multipliers, further reducing the pool of potential recruits.
Among the latter, as well as some ex-bots, some become super-multipliers, such as the people on this and other fora, who actively spread the fight against the scourge of MLMs, by using every opportunity to call out their lies.
As the pool of potential recruits declines through simple maths, this effect is massively amplified by the work of those 'activists'.
Arbunne was right on Saturday morning after the (no) cheque debacle. Those who have persistently and tirelessly fought the poisonous lies of MLMs, and provided resources for those bewildered by their (direct or indirect) experience of MLM have played a massive role in cutting the grass from under FLP's feet.
Despite the bots putting on their best 'Phoenix from the ashes' mindsets on, there is no way back (the corpse may twitch for a while).
I salute you all!