If we do not take them to court, you will be caught in a loop of sending complaints to Erudio, which they take the piss out of, then going to the relatively impotent ombudsman. Add in fannying about to that.
About the "class action":
- Set up a central fund via a third party crowd funding group.
- Pool compensation payments.
- Pool succesful complaints so they can be re-made by other people to generate more compensation. This could then go into the fund.
- Use the funds to pay for a lawyer to take Erudio to court. We will all likely benefit from the decision.
- Someone can act as the client for the lawyer, but we all contribute to the fees via the shared fund.
- I know how to beat these bastards, but don't want to pay for a lawyer on my own. (I will if I have to though).
- Court compensation is put back into fund to be distributed back.
- Two's up to Arrow Global and Wilmington Trust parasitic arseholes.
I am happy to put £100 in straight away if we get a crowd funding thing set up.
There are multiple breaches of contract in the way that Erudio have been behaving. They will be laughed out of court. They have not a leg to stand on. Many contracts are not binding, and many are in breach of many areas.
Also, it is imperative for you to do the Consumer Credit Act requests for the original agreements from Erudio. If the agreements are signed on the front by you, but were not signed on the front by the Student Loans Company, then that agreement is not binding. See clause 2 "Making the Agreement and Advancing the Loan". It is only binding when signed by both you and THEM. it is clear as day in the terms. They cannot argue it is not there.
It is additionally not enforceable under Consumer Credit Act 1974 if it is not signed by them. (Some troll may say it is, but it is not, and Erudio have to go to court to try to prove it is enforeable, this is where we would have the upper hand).
Cheers