I'm wondering what the evolutionary reason is for middle-aged spread, if anyone knows? Is there any biological advantage for an older woman retaining fat and water?
Is it because in primitive times, you'd be past your child-bearing age and useless to the tribe, except as a childminder/ veg. gatherer - and so you might get less food from the communal sharing in the tribe, than the hunters, children and child-bearing females? So your body would hold onto as much fat as possible to get you through very lean years before death?
It'd be interesting to know if that's the case, as it might help somewhat in accepting middle-aged spread.
I started a thread in Calorie-counting, recently, because I'm not losing any weight at all despite cutting down on what I eat and only eating 'healthy' foods (5ft 7in and weigh around 12 stone now, although I eat a lot less than when I was younger).
At 50, it feels as if my body has decided that this is the weight and shape I'm now going to be - plus some, every year - and nothing I do will stop it! I don't want to starve myself and I don't have time to do vigorous daily exercise. However, curbing my appetite has literally no effect at all, compared to when I was younger and so I think if I could just get my head around an evolutionary advantage to this, then that'd help.
I literally feel that if I ate nothing at all for days (not something I'd ever really do) that I'd still lose no weight and coudl survive - except for hunger! - for weeks!
I'm generally quite accepting that my body changes as I get older and have never been hung up on looks/being plump but I do like to understand things rationally. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?