FF I think that until this generation of children grow up and find their voices, we won?t know whether the current practice of sending them off to fathers they may not want to be sent off to, is a good one or not. What we do know from many of the now adults who grew up in divorced families in previous generations, is that they felt very damaged by their parents? splits, mainly where they felt they had been used as one of the weapons in the adults? armouries. The current fashion of sending them off for every other weekend or whatever, still carries the risk of them being used as weapons.
My view is that it doesn?t really matter what arrangements split families have, as long as both parents are absolutely, implacably determined to put their children?s welfare first and if each of them are totally determined to work with the other parent to achieve that. Where one or both of the adults involved are not so determined, I think the children are probably as likely to get hurt with full contact with both parents as with no contact with one.
I think the courts have really taken the view that as long as the child is seeing both parents, that?s the main thing, but imo the main thing is that the child is given security, stability, consistency and the absolute assurance of unconditional love. And regular contact with the non-residential parent or even 50:50 parenting doesn?t guarantee that; in some cases where a parent is using contact just to score points off the ex or to make the point that it?s their ?right? to see their child without actually wanting to engage in the hard work of real parenting, I think such contact can probably be harmful to a child. But as you point out someone else has decided that it?s nearly always in the child?s best interests to have this kind of contact, irrespective of its quality. Until they?re adults and can tell us about it, we won?t really know, imo. I guess the big question you?re asking is, is a really crap father better than no father at all? And I suspect that the answer will very much depend on individual circumstances. Which is why there can be no hard and fast simplistic rules on it.
Sorry, gone on a bit as usual, I think this thread is very thought-provoking.