I split up with exP about 2 months ago after discovering he was having an affair with a family friend. Apparently affair had been going on for about 1 month. Our DS is 4.
So far, arrangements about DS have been fairly amicable. We agreed a pattern of contact, and have been having weekly phone calls to discuss DS.
I did tell exP that I didn't want DS having any contact with the OW. I can't see why it would be necessary, and it's not in DS's best interests. He knows this woman as a family friend and introducing her now as exPs new girlfriend can only cause him confusion. I feel that the contact time that exP has with DS should about them spending time together. I thought that exP agreed with this.
However, I had a letter from his solicitor yesterday saying that I had been "dictating" when and where exP could see DS and who he could see when he has him, specifically that DS cannot see exP's new "partner". This apparently is not acceptable to exP...
I have replied to my solicitor stating that I have never dictated terms of contact - we have discussed and agreed contact arrangements and that I have never dictated when and where exP can see DS, I have only said that he is not to meet OW.
Do I have a legal leg to stand on? Can I prevent DS from seeing the OW? I don't want to stop, or even reduce, contact with exP as I firmly believe that it's in DS's best interests to have a good relationship with his dad. I don't believe that he needs to have any kind of relationship with OW though. DS has had a lot to deal with, with exP leaving and he's starting school soon. He's got enough upheaval in his life without introducing OW into it.