Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Legal matters

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

Ex-partner wants house bought with inheritance despite my name on deeds

199 replies

Guffy · Yesterday 12:00

My partner and I were together for 10 years. I loved her dearly and believe we had a strong relationship. About 5 years in she came into a sum of money after her father sadly died and she decided to buy a house with the money so we could set up home together. She decided to put my name on the deeds effectively giving me half the house. I cautioned her at the time that it was a big step and a generous gift but she said she loved me and it was our home. A year or so ago, after 6 months of lying and deceiving me, she left me for a local man. I now live in the house on my own but she is indicating that the house belongs to her because she ‘paid for it with my dad’s money’. Where do I stand legally please?

OP posts:
TangledUp679 · Yesterday 14:31

If you're not posting this to rage bait all the man haters Grin then please go to a solicitor and find out what you're entitled to. Or if you want to ask people online go to the LegalAdviceUK sub-Reddit. You won't get useful legal advice on this site.

MageKing · Yesterday 14:32

You aren't married. What contribution have you made? At vest, as you are on deeds you could be entitled to half but I imagine it eill also depend on you being able to prove you have co tribute financially.

Id tou didnt contribute financially, what did you do with the money you saved by living at no cost in her house?

Luddite26 · Yesterday 14:33

BerryTwister · Yesterday 12:51

Rookie error OP.
Post again and pretend you’re a woman. You’ll get very different answers.

Absolutely. I was going to say the same thing.

allthingsinmoderation · Yesterday 14:33

I think you need legal and financial advice. Did you take any legal advice at the time she put your name on the deeds regarding tax implications?
I can see why you would be devastated in your situation.
From what you have said the house is legally half yours ,your Ex gave you half the house when she loved you and now she doesnt she wants it back,i suspect thats not how it works legally but you really do need legal advice. When you have that decide what you want to do. As for morals ,people have different morals .........

Starlight7080 · Yesterday 14:33

Iiquidsnake · Yesterday 14:27

Half of the house is yours, so sell the house and divide the money in two.

You can guarantee that if it was a woman posting this then the responses would be take half, so it shouldn't be any different for a man.

I agree. If a woman had wrote this they would be told to get what they can to start again. Especially if it had been the man that had cheated

Duchoftheterrace · Yesterday 14:36

Tomorrow arrange an appointment with a solicitor Op.
By the way - people are coming at you as if you'd posted on AIBU because this is appearing in the 'trending' side bar. So, although you've posted in Legal, you're going to get all sorts of dodgy advice. Probably abuse too. :-(

Toowhiteforawedding · Yesterday 14:40

I don’t think OP actually said they were a man? In any case, OP should get off Mumsnet and get some proper legal advice

YourWildAmberSloth · Yesterday 14:42

Starlight7080 · Yesterday 14:33

I agree. If a woman had wrote this they would be told to get what they can to start again. Especially if it had been the man that had cheated

You realise that OP could be a woman.

AffableApple · Yesterday 14:50

NotMajorTom · Yesterday 12:32

You’ll get very different answer than if you were a woman doing this…

A woman who would be doing the majority, if not all of the childcare, then yes, it would be a completely different scenario. I'm assuming no children involved as none mentioned. Therefore sex, and who could have potentially taken a hit on earning potential, is irrelevant.

Morally it's hers. If it's as simple as presented though, the rent OP would have paid elsewhere if he was living rent-free at this property needs to be considered. As do improvements made to this property by him - financially, or any physical labour. As does not being able to build equity elsewhere, considering this house to be their investment as a couple. Has it stopped you getting on the housing ladder alone now - have prices in your chosen area increased?

Legally it could be considered 50/50 as the money has been put in a property with two names on the deed.

You'll recover from this period of your life better if you play fair and consider all variables, and emerge holding your head high. Play nice.

NowSober · Yesterday 14:50

YourWildAmberSloth · Yesterday 14:42

You realise that OP could be a woman.

The partner left them for a "local man" so it's most likely the OP is a man too.

thestudio · Yesterday 14:53

I think it's very different if you moved to be with her and now she's changed her mind.
Morally - she's allowed to change her mind, but equally you are entitled to something because you went into it in good faith (if you did).

Legally I think there's no argument - if you're on the deeds, you're on the deeds.

Part of me thinks that your half or third is the consolation prize for being rejected when you went it to it all in good faith (again, if you did) at a time of life when these decisions can have significant impacts down the line (because you can't get a job and move).

LittleGreenShoots · Yesterday 14:54

Morally it is her house. She has left herself in a precarious position putting you on the deeds, and was probably done out of love so you could inherit the house if she died while you were together.

You legally can take some of her inheritance now, and make it difficult for her to take back the house. I think its a bit of a scummy thing to do, but you may feel you have little options.

I think you should try- as far as you can- to sort yourself housing or buying the house without taking her inheritance. Yes cheating is morally awful but stealing from someone- even when legal to do so- is morally awful as well. Which you know this is. What kind of person do you want to be?

Tunnocksmallow · Yesterday 14:56

NotMajorTom · Yesterday 12:32

You’ll get very different answer than if you were a woman doing this…

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if after all these ‘moral’ replies, OP comes back and declares they’re a woman! 😂

rwalker · Yesterday 14:57

This could be a long expensive process that could go ether way
personally deducted what she put in and split any profits
which ever way it goes you’ll be having to leave anyway

seahorsessky · Yesterday 14:58

Notmycircusnotmyotter · Yesterday 12:06

Morally it's hers. You should move out.

Morally ended when she cheated. OP, see a lawyer for advice. Unless you cheated too.

Greebocat · Yesterday 15:09

chirrupybird · Yesterday 12:39

Yes if it was a woman it would be he may have paid for the house but look at all the work she put into it so she should get half (and that would apply even if her name wasn't on the deeds). But it is usually the woman who is on the wrong end of the deal in those situations.

If a woman is entitled to half in the same situation, then he is entitled to half. What do you mean by look at all the work she put into it?

buffyajp · Yesterday 15:16

LarryForPrimeMinister · Yesterday 12:09

Morally it is hers, but as you are on the deeds you can aruge. But really you should move out and stop being a free loader.

Ffs if we are going down the moral route then she is a disgrace and a down right cheat. She was also an idiot. I bet if we were talking about a man who had cheated instead of a woman it would be very different answers given.Op is absolutely the innocent party in this and is entitled to half I would say. I would take whatever I could legally get especially with how she has behaved. Op seek legal advice and ignore the morality police who think other women can do no wrong.

Sam9769 · Yesterday 15:16

BatteriesNotIncluded76 · Yesterday 13:49

Legally it’s half yours so it needs to be sold and you each move on with half each.
At the end of the day if she hadn’t cheated you’d have a stable home.

Yeah her home paid for with her farther's money!

MzHz · Yesterday 15:17

Go speak to a lawyer @Guffy

as it stands, it’s half yours I think. You’re going to be in deep shit if you just walk away, you owe it to yourself to do the best for yourself

MzHz · Yesterday 15:17

I believe your ex might about to learn what FAFO means

buffyajp · Yesterday 15:18

Notmycircusnotmyotter · Yesterday 12:18

I hope you're paying her rent while you live in her house

If she was stupid enough to just put his name on the deeds then, no, it’s not just her house. She’s an idiot as well as a cheat. A fact that seems to have bypassed a lot of people.

Bogstandardname · Yesterday 15:18

I would try and negotiate a fair settlement. You will need to find somewhere else to live. Take legal advice. I would say that if the house was purchased jointly and severally and this is how the deeds speak, then you legally own half of the house and she will be unable to sell without your consent.

buffyajp · Yesterday 15:20

Sam9769 · Yesterday 15:16

Yeah her home paid for with her farther's money!

Absolutely irrelevant. They were in a partnership for which he gave up his own home and family for. She shouldn’t have been so stupid and deserves everything she gets.

Sam9769 · Yesterday 15:21

You must be so happy that you have lived in this house rent free for five years and now you can get half the proceeds of the sale of the house for free. All paid for by her late father. If this is the kind of person you are I can see what she left you for a real man. And don't lie to us and said you loved her bones! You're a low life scum bag!

crazymommaclub · Yesterday 15:23

Despite how angry you must be feeling, you know that this is her house and you would be out of order trying to take her inheritance. You’ve had a good run of living rent free, and now need to move out and on with your life