@VytaminSea as I said in my first post I have been there. When I posted a comment elsewhere someone came on to the thread and said “you should be careful, this bloke might cause a lot of trouble for you.” And everyone responded with “no of course he won’t, she’s entitled to voice something which is of concern here,” and within about an hour i was being subjected to legal threats, solicitor’s letters and demands for apologies and then breakdowns of my finances.
In itself I don’t think the review is wrong, and if it had only been the review then his responses would speak for themselves. But these threads have led to posters finding the review to mark it as helpful, to deliberately highlight the fact that they don’t think people should go there, even though they themselves have never been there. And through that the OP has been outed on here, and because someone has linked a copy of this thread to a facebook post the thread has been linked to the OP and now anyone who is potentially on this bloke’s side could quite easily find the OP and give her a hard time over it.
It’s all very well people sitting here saying “ignore the letters, he won’t do anything,” but what if he does? He already has form for going back and back and back to councils etc re his refused planning permission. He clearly doesn’t just lay down and take no for an answer. Are the MN’ers telling the OP he can’t do anything to her going to be paying her legal bills if she gets a court summons?
Threatening legal action over the review was ridiculous, but there were plenty of other reviews there which would back up what the OP had said, so it was unlikely to come to anything. But threads talking about it with hundreds and hundreds of posters going on to mark the review as helpful has made it much worse and is far more likely to give this bloke some ammunition if he does decide to go to court.
He’s clearly prepared to spend money here because he’s already sent the OP a solicitor’s letter, and again, suggestions that it wasn’t a real solicitor and that there is a criminal act being conducted here is pure speculation and again, inflammatory.