Hi,
My teenage son's father has never paid a regular and reasonable amount of chicld support.
We have never been married and I ended the relationship when our son was a toddler.
Last year my son's father said he was out of work and paid just £5 per month! I later found out from the CSA he had been in work.
Am I right to say he can't have contact because he's refused to pay?
I know my son has a right, and wants, to see his father but it worries me that he will learn this negative behaviour.
There is fine line developmentally at my son's age, between understanding something is wrong, and my son understands his dad's behaviour is wrong, but still learning by example.
'Cash for contact' seems a cruel term but if the roles were reversed and he was the parents with care and I asked for access while refusing to pay a reasonable amount I would expect him to tell me where to go.
Morally am I wrong?
And legally am I wrong?
Since being forced to pay by the CSA he's decided to apply to court for contact and parental responsibilities.
We're both funded by Legal Aid so I'm worried he has too much leeway.
his solicitor is a member of Resolution yet no offer of mediation has been made.
Court should be a final option not a first step shouldn't it?