How big an employer they are compared to others is irrlevant
If you say 'a tird over staffed ' thats different of course, I may not argue there.
Cuts to the NHS etc willshift expenditure betwen budgets as much as save it- as people become unemployed they will claim benefits instead of wages.It'sjopbs we need so we can pay taxes rather than cuts- there'sa trade off, income is better than expenditure after all
And of course you can prioritise! It's perfectly OK to say 'Look our priorities for spendinga re those who need their services, so whilst we will minimise cuts in (say carers allowance that we get), we will make cuts in Y
There's also theissue of intelligent cuts; you can make x% redundant with no job prospects, or you for example reduce the admin burden on business and combine new growth with reduced expenditure os tax admin in the public sector.
As a society weneed to work out what we prioritise. People go on about cuts to the arts as if they are the worst thing eer, but how more important are htye thsn the disabled, ors chools or whatever?
That's where the deabte should be happening.that cuts have to be made is certain, where is still up for garbs.