Can I also put in a plug for AIMS here? www.aims.org.uk
I do like Walsh' original article but I do agree that if you have technocratic birth model in place that you can't simply withdraw the pain relief, and I don't really believe he is arguing for that.
I had two horrendously painful birth experiences where I used everything going, both ending in emergency cs followed by a co-erced cs followed by a home waterbirth. I chose,and eventually paid for an IM so I could try for, a birth without pain relief (other than birth pool which was actually brilliant pain relief). I didn't do it to feel superior but my belief system was that if I was supported well and in an environment where I felt safe I would not be in significant pain. That is not new research it has been around since NCT started fifty plus years ago, indeed formed the basis for its inception.
The scenario Walsh opens with is interesting and I think he does acknowledge the dilemma it raises for the midwife because at transition I think a lot of women would say/yell give me an epidural but there is rarely time and it could completely alter the course of the labour AND once in active second stage many women are then feeling back in control and don't want epidural. So is the midwife's role to rush out and get an anaesthetist knowing that this will double the mother's risk of needing forceps/ventouse? Or does he/she listen to what is behind the yell for an epidural? Does he/she reassure, help mum find a comfortable position, help her get thru what might be a difficult half hour but ultimately help her to a place where she no longer wants that kind of pain relief?
I think Walsh got well and truly done over by lazy journalists and I wish Mumsnet would invite him to a debate here.
I've taught antenatal classes for 10 years and most women I've met when they've looked at the evidence around pain relief when pregnant have wanted to avoid epidural. The problem is that we don't promote home birth nor have birth environments nor one to one midwifery care which would help put this into practice. Furthermore our culture constantly puts out the message that birth is always agonising, difficult, dangerous and we couldn't or shouldn't even think about doing it without help be it doctors, instruments and pharmacology.
I was just at NCT conference in Swansea where there was a midwife talking about how in her part of Wales they had increased the homebirth rate from 2% to 12% - their average labour for first time mothers at a homebirth or in midwife led unit was 8 hours!!! They weren't denying mothers pain relief, they simply didn't want or need it. NCT has campaigned, is still campaigning for that sort of care for all low risk women who want it but we would never campaign against pain relief for those who want or need it and if you are giving birth in a consultant obstetric unit on your own for hours on end or being induced then you probably are going to need it.
Walsh has been criticised for not being a woman and not understanding what it feels like but another problem with the whole debate is that everyone's experience is unique and we need to respect everyone comes to birth with different belief systems. What frustrates me most as an antenatal teacher is not the woman who makes an informed choice to have an epidural from the off but the woman who desperately wants to avoid one but cannot do so because the system won't support her to do so and who ends up with a whole cascade of interventions and then blames her own body for failing her when its the system that failed her.
Sorry, long and rambly musings.
Jenny