People - There has been some objection on this and other threads about how the media has simplified the issues surrounding the financial meltdown and has demonised bankers.
The two issues are connected; we have a media that is story and picture-driven and that has a quick turn over and very little interest in prolonged analysis of issues. So they do tend to go for headline-grabbing, simple ideas: "Meltdown" "Bankers are criminals".
I agree with posters who have objected that things are not that simple.
So ... is it not impossible to see that the same thing happens when it comes to protests such as this?
The same simplifying, picture-driven, headline-grabbing, story-based media, whose main terror is reader ennui, is out there today looking for the most simplistic angle and the most "arresting" pictures.
I do think that the people who have experienced their own demonisation in the press should have learned a little cynicism from the experience and be casting a jaundiced eye on the coverage.
Let's face it, we have our policywonk (yay!) inside the G20, who will no doubt be posting us exciting stories about long talks and meetings, but I'll bet the idea of that just makes the newspaper editors want to go to sleep. Far better a few "violent" images their readers can lick off the page.
And maybe someone should offer link to a tweet from "inside" the protest?