BabyBaby123 on Thu 19-Feb-09 19:20:03
"i would say it is more to do with behaviour and morals than whether or not they are on benefits. I must say though, I am surprised he comes from a middle class background.... the girl in particular came across as very thick in the interview i saw"
This has got to be one of the most stupid comments on Mumsnet ever!
And incidentally, it is why I object to the term chav. Because however much we try to deny it, it is class related, and it is based on the idea that certain types of stupid behaviour are confined to the lower classes.
If the daughter of the professor of numismatics gets herself knocked up- noone is going to call the family chavs, are they?
I knew some perfectly well educated teenagers from respectable families who were having early sex in the 1970's (yes, teenagers were at it in the olden days!!!). Pure luck, not absence of chavisms that those condoms didn't break.
I also knew some middle-class families who were as thick as you make 'em; in fact, I still know some of those.
What is unusual and nasty in the present case is not the social class or the age of the mother (the father admittedly is very young), but the attention-seeking and money-grabbing attitude of the boy's father. But attention-seeking and money-grabbing is not exactly confined to any one social class in our society, is it?