Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

NHS England to be abolished

91 replies

Chelsea2026 · 13/03/2025 14:25

Shocking news that NHS England is to be abolished by 2027 and all functions moved into DHSC!

OP posts:
Chelsea2026 · 14/03/2025 06:58

countingthedays945 · 14/03/2025 03:40

I’ve experience working with NHSE in my university role. It’s mostly been negative tbh. All they wanted from me was data and stats but I received very little constructive help to create more trained nurses on the ground. I do feel for individuals in these roles. There are not other NHS jobs to move into currently.

NHS England is very heavily focused on data I am sorry you didnt get support you needed. I worked for NHS England from 2015 to 2023 and they were a good employer. (I also worked for HSCIC which was merged into NHS England ).

OP posts:
Chelsea2026 · 14/03/2025 07:00

maria2bela1 · 13/03/2025 15:10

My job is one that will go as a result. 3 kids and basically on the breadline, not ideal, but I do understand the bigger picture. Also not great for those who have left stable jobs to join NHSE/ICBs who will now have to go through process all over again.

@maria2bela1 I am so sorry to hear that your job is going - have NHSE published any timescales internally for the transition to DHSC. Do you know if those who remain will stay on AFC or move to Civil Service grades.

OP posts:
HelenWheels · 14/03/2025 07:00

hopefully we can train more doctors and keep them now

Chelsea2026 · 14/03/2025 07:01

EmeraldRoulette · 13/03/2025 15:25

I was going to start a thread on this.
As far as I can see, it's good news. Things certainly ran better before this organisation began in 2013. As a repeated user of NHS services for both parents going back further than that, hospitalisations and treatment have been much much worse after increased bureaucracy.

I was very much under the impression that it was just an extra layer of bureaucracy and gave the impression of creating jobs. Although I could never see why the Conservatives wanted to create jobs. Was it to create wealth for all their management mates?

I would have tackled the NHS Confederation first but perhaps it will fall by the wayside naturally?

People can't have it both ways. Unfortunately, there have been several governments who have created lots of paperwork jobs. We now can't cut those without causing upset.

The complaints I've seen so far are a bit mad though. In the private sector, there is no way this would happen slowly over two years!

I no longer trust any government to use savings efficiently. But it seems like a very good step to take - to remove a layer of bureaucracy. I'm old enough to remember Gordon Brown saying that it was the job of the government to create government jobs. That actually horrified me. I suppose where we go next depends on what people believe. Some people do support that view.

Really governments should have been on top of options for natural wastage, e.g. not replacing people who retired in pointless organisations. But the only politician I have heard dare to say that recently is Liz Truss and we know what happened to her.

Edited

I am wondering if CQC will be abolished too (or merged into DHSC)

OP posts:
Chelsea2026 · 14/03/2025 07:04

Ineffable23 · 13/03/2025 16:14

NHS England also run centralised IT services (e.g. the NHS spine which contains patient data), and runs pretty much all the education of all staff, including clinical staff across the NHS.

They also have responsibilities relating to research and actually putting together information from all the local hospitals so e.g. Wes Streeting's team can get information in a format where they can actually analyse it.

They organise the delivery of national immunisation programmes and making sure e.g. COVID vaccines are where they need to be, when they need to be.

On top of that, they, working with ICBs which are also experiencing massive cuts, work out what services need to be offered to local populations (e.g. where is big enough to need an A and E, should doctors surgeries be allowed to close or do they need to be run by someone else, where should a minor injuries unit be, where should eating disorder patients be treated) and work out how to make sure the population has access to specialised commissioning such as proton beam therapy and how to manage tertiary (super specialist) hospitals.

They also work out how much money different areas and different organisations within different areas should get - boring but someone has to do it. They make sure local pharmacies have the contracts to do our prescriptions and that we have enough pharmacies in our local areas to meet our needs.

They agree and organise care for people who need complex, long term health care but who don't need to be in hospital.

You can't procure healthcare for 67 million people without the things above being managed. And that involves back office staff.

The organisations above have already been asked to make big savings under the last government (around 20-30% by the end of 2023-24).

Another 50% will mean some services have to be stopped.

Editing to add: they also procure all the medicines used in the UK's hospitals. I'm sure I'll remember more.

Edited

I agree that main work programmes in the NHS nationally will be cancelled. Does anyone know yet what will happen to UDAL and the Federated Data Platform? Who will process SUS and HES data? Will external organisations still get data feeds?

OP posts:
zebrapig · 14/03/2025 07:38

@Chelsea2026 staff have only been told that they hope to have a plan of what will be happening by June. As someone trying to lead a team of people through this it's just awful as we have no information at all, and what we are told conflicts with what DHSC staff are told.

Chelsea2026 · 14/03/2025 07:45

zebrapig · 14/03/2025 07:38

@Chelsea2026 staff have only been told that they hope to have a plan of what will be happening by June. As someone trying to lead a team of people through this it's just awful as we have no information at all, and what we are told conflicts with what DHSC staff are told.

Thank you for the update - it must be really hard for you. Will be interested to find out more in June. What have DHSC been told?

OP posts:
Clearinguptheclutter · 14/03/2025 07:52

It probably makes sense in the long run but is very bad news for those affected

that said my company (private sector) is merging with another too, and we’re losing lots of “duplicates” too so it’s really not an unusual scenario generally

Amanda p’s departure makes sense now.

mrschocolatte · 14/03/2025 08:11

EmeraldRoulette · 13/03/2025 22:47

@pickywatermelon "And for the people involved, terrible to hear on the news about this change - if a private company announced a whole division would go with 50% job cuts people would be up in arms"

no. No one gives a crap usually when private companies make massive redundancies. There was a lot of sympathy of course social media when the P&O thing happened. The banks have done mass redundancies without anybody noticing or caring.

Unless you mean being up in arms about the news. A poster on another thread has said that Amanda Pritchard sent out an email before the announcement on TV. There's nothing you can do about that. The announcement has to go to everybody at the same and my closest friend was on holiday when the last redundancy happened to her. So she wouldn't have seen an email. Her boss rang her on holiday, which was the decent thing to do, but ironically, my friend was really pissed off about being contacted on holiday.

Being made redundant is crap. But we have all been through it. And I was also saying on the other thread, no one seems to give a shit when it's a private company. And usually in a private company, you get very little warning and they will often target people with under two years service so they can get them out quickly and without a payoff.

Public sectors have a level of protection that I can't even imagine. If I had gone into the public sector 30 years ago, I would probably be much better off now.

I’ve worked in Public Sector all my working life…32 years and counting. My peer group of friends all work in the Private Sector. For the last 15 years I’ve had to listen to them talk about pay rises and bonuses and trips abroad and work parties paid for by employers. Their salaries have increased and they earn significantly more than they did 15 years ago. I don’t. I’m fact I’m financially worse off than I was 15 years ago. If I could change my decision 30 odd years ago to work in the Public Sector I probably would!

CurrentHun · 14/03/2025 08:16

I really don’t understand Labour’s thinking at the moment. Nothing about increasing big company taxation. No big ticket ideas like Education, Education, Education. or even in these hard economic times Energy, Energy, Energy. Let alone Environment, Environment, Environment. Which costs more to fix the longer we leave it.

Lots of bullshit petty policies to appease the left of the party though, like whacking up farming inheritance tax so farms get sold off and VAT on private schools. These will have bad knock on effects for ordinary families who just want to eat affordable British food, or just want not have huge class sizes, or who would like to use the most desirable state schools for their kids.

Then we have this kind of thing, snap-abolishing NHS England. This appears to be another ill thought through populist punt seemingly aimed at online right wingers who are going to vote Reform anyway.
The last bloody thing we need is the NHS who has valiantly struggled on caring for us though Covid and through our long term demographics of a rapidly ageing British population, in poorer health due to shameful economic mismanagement creating dreadful poverty levels (I think it’s 10% of the population regularly skipping meals now, because they can’t afford to eat).

Now overnight the government wants to whack in a massive bonfire in health care. I would much rather that doctors and nurses didn’t have to spend time doing the organisational tasks that a civil servant could do for less money.

I’d like the focus to be on making the NHS as efficient as possible and guess what- that takes people and resources to make that happen.

Only complete idiots imagine that it’s just a question of funding doctors and nurses a bit better. There are zillions of systemic issues in the NHS to manage and many very specialist services to take care of. That work is a specialism in itself and someone else doing it allows the healthcare professionals to be with patients doing their jobs.

And also I think as a principle it’s really important to free the NHS from direct political interference as much as possible. I don’t think politicians understand the NHS that well and it’s far far too important to our lives for politicians muck about with it for likes. Which is what’s happening here.

CurrentHun · 14/03/2025 08:21

I had a lot of respect for Wes Streeting and so I’m pretty shocked he would put his name to this. I don’t work for the NHS or civil service.
I just know people whose kids’ care relies entirely on some very specialist NHS services that are organised by NHS England, who are extremely worried by this. The patient groups were not consulted about this and so parents and patients are completely in the dark as to what’s going to happen.

MissUnicorn · 14/03/2025 08:31

I do worry about the knock-on effect.
I work with the NHSE in my university job and since the cuts, payment to placements is taking even longer. Some placements are now not accepting medical students until they get paid which means there's a dearth of placements.

CatsWhiskerz · 14/03/2025 08:38

I'd also like to see some of the ridiculously expensive staff in hospitals reduced too like assistant director of mops etc - far too many £100k+ management staff in the NHS trusts

MILsAreHumanToo · 14/03/2025 09:13

endlesscraziness · 13/03/2025 20:55

@madaffodil actually that’s a false claim. Every study has shown that they NHS is under managed when compared to other, successful healthcare systems

Are these self-serving studies implemented by managers?

I recently attended, along with several colleagues, including other managers and clinicians, a meeting called by a manager. There was no agenda to the meeting. The manager asked if there was anything anyone needed to talk about, as there was no agenda and they themselves did not have anything to raise. This brought on a tumble weed moment and a lot of shuffling followed by some mumbled murmurs of ‘no’. The manager then announced the date of the next meeting.

All of this none-event was minuted - as in, this meeting was attended by several John and Jane Doe’s, No matters raised. Meeting ended and date of next meeting is on did/mm/yyyy. These none-minutes were typed and distributed.

What a complete and utter waste of time with all the associated costs. One meeting in one department in one Trust … multiply this across the whole failing system ... This is what needs to end!

kungfoofighting · 14/03/2025 09:24

CatsWhiskerz · 14/03/2025 08:38

I'd also like to see some of the ridiculously expensive staff in hospitals reduced too like assistant director of mops etc - far too many £100k+ management staff in the NHS trusts

Apparently senior management roles increased by approx 50% in recent years (think it was since 2018 but would have to check.)

StumbleInTheDebris · 14/03/2025 10:24

EmeraldRoulette · 13/03/2025 23:42

But that's rooted in improving efficiency within hospital systems

if NHS England are involved in that, then should they be? Internal hospital admin should be doing that surely.

Absolutely - it was more a general comment on the attitude of "admin bad, doctors shouldn't waste their time on it and we shouldn't employ lots of people just to do admin".

I bet there are tons of needless things happening. But, to improve efficiency, perhaps we do need people to measure and assess it? I don't know, I don't have skin in the game!

KirriIrry · 14/03/2025 11:14

Justsayit123 · 13/03/2025 14:39

Let’s see what happens. Why does NHSE need a comms team when the dept of health has one and the government has one too. There’s lots of duplication. As long as they do t cut front line and direct support staff, great. They can increase staff who do checks on tourist patients. They can stop all the excessive woke crap like period advisors.

‘Woke bollocks’ is an interesting accusation - what’s your take on the Incontinence Service, or the erectile dysfunction clinic - are they woke bollocks as well?!

HellonHeels · 14/03/2025 11:22

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 13/03/2025 15:41

Supporting 50% of the population with a painful and messy bodily function isn't "woke".

It becomes 'woke bollocks' when they appoint males to the support roles.

Badbadbunny · 14/03/2025 11:24

KirriIrry · 14/03/2025 11:14

‘Woke bollocks’ is an interesting accusation - what’s your take on the Incontinence Service, or the erectile dysfunction clinic - are they woke bollocks as well?!

There isn't the funds for everything. Hard decisions have to be made. My MIL died after 48 hours in a trolley in A&E for something pretty easily treatable. I'd have rather she'd received treatment and a hospital bed if money/staffing are short, rather than them dealing with upsetting/disturbing conditions like that which are unpleasant but tend not to result in unnecessary early death! It's a matter of priorities, sadly.

If the money saved from abolishing NHS Direct (and it's a big "if") is spent on more front line staff (training and wages), more hospital beds (or better usage efficiency), more scanners (or better usage efficiency), etc., then bring it on.

zebrapig · 14/03/2025 11:39

@Chelsea2026 Apparently they have been told about their redundancy scheme - we've been given the impression it would be one scheme across both orgs. Also in terms of loss of jobs, we've been subjected to a recruitment freeze (fair enough) but they haven't. It seems to be one rule for us and one for them, which isn't surprising given the whole thing is driven by the government and politics.

KirriIrry · 14/03/2025 11:43

@Badbadbunny I am sorry for your loss, I really am. There are unfortunately many situations like yours and it is awful.
My issue with the pp was their dismissal of such a clinic as woke - it seemed odd to me.
And whilst I agree there isn’t the funds for everything, there are a lot of conditions that are unpleasant but won’t end your life your life. Where do we draw the line?
Actually, I remember a thread on here a while a go about what shouldn’t be funded by the NHS and it largely boiled down to ‘things that don’t affect me or my loved ones.’
I suppose the real question is, will the money saved go on funding the things you mention - I certainly hope so, but I’m a bit too cynical to believe it these days.

Chelsea2026 · 14/03/2025 13:08

Badbadbunny · 14/03/2025 11:24

There isn't the funds for everything. Hard decisions have to be made. My MIL died after 48 hours in a trolley in A&E for something pretty easily treatable. I'd have rather she'd received treatment and a hospital bed if money/staffing are short, rather than them dealing with upsetting/disturbing conditions like that which are unpleasant but tend not to result in unnecessary early death! It's a matter of priorities, sadly.

If the money saved from abolishing NHS Direct (and it's a big "if") is spent on more front line staff (training and wages), more hospital beds (or better usage efficiency), more scanners (or better usage efficiency), etc., then bring it on.

If all government healthcare organisations are abolished who will check that local providers are managing patient care effectively?

OP posts:
Badbadbunny · 14/03/2025 13:14

Chelsea2026 · 14/03/2025 13:08

If all government healthcare organisations are abolished who will check that local providers are managing patient care effectively?

Presumably there was a hierarchy of control in place before the 90s and 00s when Trusts were created and before 2013 when NHS England was created??

I'm pretty sure that GP surgeries and hospitals weren't just given shedloads of cash by Whitehall without there being any consultation, control, supervision, etc. Pretty sure I remember things like regional boards and management committees with governors etc.

Aaron95 · 14/03/2025 15:04

Sadcafe · 13/03/2025 14:36

Not sure why it’s shocking, 13000 jobs and salaries that could be put to much better use providing front line NHS services

You don't know what NHS England does do you?

Aaron95 · 14/03/2025 15:06

HelenWheels · 14/03/2025 07:00

hopefully we can train more doctors and keep them now

Considering the body that funds and manages doctor training has just been abolished I wouldn't bet on it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread