Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

NHS England to be abolished

91 replies

Chelsea2026 · 13/03/2025 14:25

Shocking news that NHS England is to be abolished by 2027 and all functions moved into DHSC!

OP posts:
MILsAreHumanToo · 13/03/2025 19:46

About time too! Next they need to abolish the wasteful money pits that are local NHS Trusts and make it all truly 'national' again.

madaffodil · 13/03/2025 20:48

Ineffable23 · 13/03/2025 16:32

By changing the structure, you realise they have said they want both NHS England and ICBs to halve in size? That's not just a "structure change" that is cuts. Unless you believe (and maybe you do believe it, but I certainly don't) that 50% of people at these organisations are genuinely doing pointless jobs, you can't make changes of that nature, without reducing the number of things they do.

Bear in mind they were already asked to make 20-30% savings 2 years ago. So if 100% was 2022, then you are now at 75% and then if you halve that again you're at 37.5% of 2022 levels.

Clearly staff will do their utmost to make sure delivery isn't affected but pretending that changes like this won't have an impact is absurd.

Prior to the existence of NHS England you had a larger department of health, plus Strategic Health Authorities plus Primary Care Trusts.

Edited

Pointless jobs?

Maybe that's the issue with the NHS - it is admin-heavy and far too much money is paying for that instead of front-line services and immediate administrative support for clinical staff.

I don't have to go to hospital all that often, but when I do, the corridors are full of managerial-looking people striding about.

endlesscraziness · 13/03/2025 20:54

I suspect in reality a lot of jobs will be absorbed by DHSC but there will be a reduction on duplication. Things like NHS cyber will just move to DHSC. I do think this is generally a good thing but it will be interesting to see how it plays out

Ineffable23 · 13/03/2025 20:55

madaffodil · 13/03/2025 20:48

Pointless jobs?

Maybe that's the issue with the NHS - it is admin-heavy and far too much money is paying for that instead of front-line services and immediate administrative support for clinical staff.

I don't have to go to hospital all that often, but when I do, the corridors are full of managerial-looking people striding about.

I put a list, a few posts north of that that explained a small proportion of the things these organisations do. They mainly aren't the ones reference walking the corridors.

Which bits, of my list above, do you want to be channeled into front line staff instead?

Is it the education programmes to keep up with nurses' CPD? Or the information systems with patient records in them? Or the organisation of vaccination services? Or working out what services need to be delivered where? Or how to deliver specialised services? Maybe you'd stop buying drugs for hospitals.

And what do you think is going to happen when those things aren't done?

You can't organise healthcare for 67 million people without boring back office staff. As I've said before, I'm not saying they're perfect but you can't get rid of half the staff and still achieve all those things.

endlesscraziness · 13/03/2025 20:55

@madaffodil actually that’s a false claim. Every study has shown that they NHS is under managed when compared to other, successful healthcare systems

ohfourfoxache · 13/03/2025 21:04

@maria2bela1 I’m sending you a huge hug, it’s a shit place to be in Sad

I’m in an ICB, work my arse off in quality - helping to figure out how to make care safer. Feel completely demoralised tbh

Hoppinggreen · 13/03/2025 21:10

maria2bela1 · 13/03/2025 15:10

My job is one that will go as a result. 3 kids and basically on the breadline, not ideal, but I do understand the bigger picture. Also not great for those who have left stable jobs to join NHSE/ICBs who will now have to go through process all over again.

I am really sorry for that and for everyone else in a similar position but i think it is a good thing.
Doesn't help you though @maria2bela1 and I hope you get another job quickly

Hydrangeadangerranger · 13/03/2025 21:12

madaffodil · 13/03/2025 14:34

Good. It's a quango separate to the NHS itself anyway, and the fewer quangos we have, the better.

Not all quangos are the same…

IBSisBS · 13/03/2025 21:18

It’s going to have devastating impacts on local economies, Leeds is home to one of the biggest NHS England employers.

The tech market is tough enough, I also work kinda inside NHSE and senior leaders of NHSE were completely blindsided to this decision.

pickywatermelon · 13/03/2025 21:25

I am not sure this “shock and awe” playing to the headlines is going to be effective tbh

And for the people involved, terrible to hear on the news about this change - if a private company announced a whole division would go with 50% job cuts people would be up in arms …

There is a reason no other country in the world copies the UK NHS as a model

I was hoping there would be a grown up discussion about healthcare reform and funding … too much to hope for

MissRachelismycoparent · 13/03/2025 21:25

As an employee that is going to be affected by this, it's really difficult news to be announced. I'm also surprised it wasn't leaked beforehand. The trust I work for has released a panicked email trying to summarise the announcement. Some of the announcements are due to take effect by December 2025 which seems unattainable.

Looking at with an impartial view, I can see why it will benefit the NHS. Essentially lots of NHS clerical staff are on AFC pay scales which means they get all AFC t&C, entitled to all the pay rises and benefits and it's simply not affordable. Once you start outsourcing those jobs to other companies you save a lot of money.

Lyannaa · 13/03/2025 21:26

I trust this government and I think their reforms will be far more progressive than the last a-holes who were in charge.

zebrapig · 13/03/2025 22:30

Reform and change is absolutely needed as we all know the NHS has its issues. This isn't a well thought out reform, it's a gut reaction of a government trying to make their make and please their voters. Those at the highest level have had some inkling it was coming as they're jumping like rats from a sinking ship. For everyone else the first they know about it is when the PM announces it to the nation. For those individuals affected it's a truly awful situation to be in, with no idea of whether they'll have a job in a few months time as no-one can tell them what the plan is.

Oblomov25 · 13/03/2025 22:31

Blimey that is quick. By 2027? Where is this stated please. Not entirely surprised.

HappiestSleeping · 13/03/2025 22:32

Gardenyear · 13/03/2025 14:46

As I understand it , it was only set up in 2011 and designed to distance government from responsibility for NHS shortcomings.

I don't think anyone could argue it's improved anything, so absolutely right it should go and good that government wants to get closer and take responsibility IMO.

What do you think they do that's so valuable as to make the news shocking OP?

I think the OP meant it's shocking that it hasn't happened sooner 😉

Rivari · 13/03/2025 22:42

Ineffable23 · 13/03/2025 16:14

NHS England also run centralised IT services (e.g. the NHS spine which contains patient data), and runs pretty much all the education of all staff, including clinical staff across the NHS.

They also have responsibilities relating to research and actually putting together information from all the local hospitals so e.g. Wes Streeting's team can get information in a format where they can actually analyse it.

They organise the delivery of national immunisation programmes and making sure e.g. COVID vaccines are where they need to be, when they need to be.

On top of that, they, working with ICBs which are also experiencing massive cuts, work out what services need to be offered to local populations (e.g. where is big enough to need an A and E, should doctors surgeries be allowed to close or do they need to be run by someone else, where should a minor injuries unit be, where should eating disorder patients be treated) and work out how to make sure the population has access to specialised commissioning such as proton beam therapy and how to manage tertiary (super specialist) hospitals.

They also work out how much money different areas and different organisations within different areas should get - boring but someone has to do it. They make sure local pharmacies have the contracts to do our prescriptions and that we have enough pharmacies in our local areas to meet our needs.

They agree and organise care for people who need complex, long term health care but who don't need to be in hospital.

You can't procure healthcare for 67 million people without the things above being managed. And that involves back office staff.

The organisations above have already been asked to make big savings under the last government (around 20-30% by the end of 2023-24).

Another 50% will mean some services have to be stopped.

Editing to add: they also procure all the medicines used in the UK's hospitals. I'm sure I'll remember more.

Edited

I worked in a regional team for the last four years until recently, and we also oversaw the implementation of policies and ensure local ICBs are doing what they are supposed to do, scrutinising data and supporting ICBs to do what they are supposed to do.

There's a lot of important functions happening in NHSE which will need to be done by someone regardless of the name of the organisation.

EmeraldRoulette · 13/03/2025 22:47

@pickywatermelon "And for the people involved, terrible to hear on the news about this change - if a private company announced a whole division would go with 50% job cuts people would be up in arms"

no. No one gives a crap usually when private companies make massive redundancies. There was a lot of sympathy of course social media when the P&O thing happened. The banks have done mass redundancies without anybody noticing or caring.

Unless you mean being up in arms about the news. A poster on another thread has said that Amanda Pritchard sent out an email before the announcement on TV. There's nothing you can do about that. The announcement has to go to everybody at the same and my closest friend was on holiday when the last redundancy happened to her. So she wouldn't have seen an email. Her boss rang her on holiday, which was the decent thing to do, but ironically, my friend was really pissed off about being contacted on holiday.

Being made redundant is crap. But we have all been through it. And I was also saying on the other thread, no one seems to give a shit when it's a private company. And usually in a private company, you get very little warning and they will often target people with under two years service so they can get them out quickly and without a payoff.

Public sectors have a level of protection that I can't even imagine. If I had gone into the public sector 30 years ago, I would probably be much better off now.

NerrSnerr · 13/03/2025 22:49

I think it's also worth noting that continuing healthcare teams are employed by the ICBs. I have recently left CHC and it's already hugely stretched. It's already a difficult job as CHC assessors are under so couch pressure from everyone and get so much abuse for doing their job. The ICB cut will make waits for CHC assessments even longer.

EveryDayisFriday · 13/03/2025 22:57

Public services are measured in Efficacy and Efficiency. Ie how efficient they are at utilising the resources they have and how effective the output is. I don't have a full understanding on NSHE and how it works but anything to improve both of those things has to be good thing.

StumbleInTheDebris · 13/03/2025 23:38

"Admin-heavy" work is a weird thing to moan about. I've seen a ton of people utterly frustrated when their appointment letter reaches them after the appointment date, or to their old address.

It's not brain surgery, granted, but without admin being done the brain surgery won't be either.

EmeraldRoulette · 13/03/2025 23:42

StumbleInTheDebris · 13/03/2025 23:38

"Admin-heavy" work is a weird thing to moan about. I've seen a ton of people utterly frustrated when their appointment letter reaches them after the appointment date, or to their old address.

It's not brain surgery, granted, but without admin being done the brain surgery won't be either.

But that's rooted in improving efficiency within hospital systems

if NHS England are involved in that, then should they be? Internal hospital admin should be doing that surely.

countingthedays945 · 14/03/2025 03:40

I’ve experience working with NHSE in my university role. It’s mostly been negative tbh. All they wanted from me was data and stats but I received very little constructive help to create more trained nurses on the ground. I do feel for individuals in these roles. There are not other NHS jobs to move into currently.

jellyfishperiwinkle · 14/03/2025 04:09

Sounds like a good idea if roles are duplicated between a government department and this body.

Melcl1987 · 14/03/2025 06:56

madaffodil · 13/03/2025 20:48

Pointless jobs?

Maybe that's the issue with the NHS - it is admin-heavy and far too much money is paying for that instead of front-line services and immediate administrative support for clinical staff.

I don't have to go to hospital all that often, but when I do, the corridors are full of managerial-looking people striding about.

I am sorry but this nonsense, every health care system in the world has management and the nhs actually has a lower proportion of managers than other better performing healthcare systems.

Nhs managers have become a useful political football for politicians who don't want to provide the nhs with the level of funding it needs or resolve the difficult problems such as workforce shortages

We still spend less per head on healthcare than most other countries and the money saved by reducing the nhs england workforce makes up an incredibly tiny proportion of the total budget

People say things were better before nhs england was established which is correct but misses the point that funding per capita declined significantly from that point due to austerity

There were also regional bodies that soke of the work nhs england does now prior to 2012 but there is no reference to those being stood back up.

If people think this will improve things for patients they will be disappointed, as most healthcare think tanks have pointed out this work will be a distraction from the real job of improving services

Chelsea2026 · 14/03/2025 06:56

Sadcafe · 13/03/2025 14:36

Not sure why it’s shocking, 13000 jobs and salaries that could be put to much better use providing front line NHS services

I wholly disagree - NHS England is there to produce statistics and help drive national NHS trust policy and without the data how can we know how the NHS is doing and whether they are meeting targets. NHSE should remain!

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread