Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Grenfell Tower - what am I missing??

171 replies

TyrannasaurusJex · 06/02/2025 11:03

Just listening to the news and various survivors and victims groups from Grenfell Tower giving very strong opinions on the plans to disassemble the building.
I'm not quite following why some want it to stay up? Do they mean as a sort of memorial? Can anyone explain?

OP posts:
Toddlerhelpplease123 · 15/02/2025 00:43

Househunter2025 · 15/02/2025 00:34

Hmm I think this is a little naive. People did know that it wasn't safe before it happened. I listened to a lot of the findings of the inquiry on radio 4. Lots of people involved in the manufacture and sale of the cladding did know it wasn't safe. The safety testing was based on unrealistic conditions and people were aware of that. Also people were aware that it wasn't safe in the way it was being used. There had been other fires in similar buildings. Cost cutting and profit were the reasons why a blind eye was turned. Because no single person was in charge, and there were multiple contractors and subcontractors involved, everyone blamed everyone else and no one will be held to account. In addition the design of Grenfell wasn't safe and that was also raised before it happened.

It’s not naive. I worked in the industry at the time and everyone was shocked.

Yes there was a problem with the claddings fire rating but architects and engineers didnt know this. They were given the incorrect information by the company.

That aside that wasnt what made this so disastrous. It was the stack effect which is basically fire/smoke/heat moving through air gap like a chimney which made this fire move so fast.

That cladding - air gap - insulation design is all over the country. Literally. I left architecture shortly after grenfell so I am not sure now what people use now. But that style of system design was practically industry standard. It was and still is everywhere!

I dont think people realise that.

MercurialButton · 15/02/2025 00:47

personally don’t understand the “need” for an unsafe structure to stand as a “memorial”

There are many memorials around the area.

It’s a loud small group who are aggrieved, IMO, they need the building as a symbol to use in media to prove their pain/loss. On repeat.

But why is this different from say a train wreck, or plane crash. The remains are removed, the wreckage removed - it’s normal. Home burn, get rebuilt. City of London, burned rebuilt.

They don’t want the area rebuilt - homes are rebuilt after fires all the time, even if there was negligence.

It’s a big area, where there is need for housing - but it won’t be built on. There are many people who would live there - like the thousands arriving by boat - do you think they care that there was a tragedy when they get brand new flat???

It’s a terrible location for garden or park.

Keeping a hazard for memorial is INSANE.

SassK · 15/02/2025 00:49

I understand the emotion of the families. The tower needs to come down though, it will become unsafe at some point. The families need to be supported well during that process, and a proper memorial space should be built.

Needmorelego · 15/02/2025 00:53

@MercurialButton it's not a terrible area for a park or garden. It's actually probably a perfect area. It's in a corner surrounded by a sports centre (which has a nice cafe that literally faces it), a school and other housing. I assume the play park at the back of the building is actually still there - but obviously not useable at the moment.
It could make a really nice garden area with a memorial, play area, picnic seats etc.

MercurialButton · 15/02/2025 00:55

Stealer · 14/02/2025 23:54

A life is a life. Anyone who thinks that an 'illegal' immigrants life is worth less than theirs is a cunt.

I recall some of the issue was that council tenants were subletting their council flat, making money renting it to others whilst the real council tenant lived elsewhere. Some The people who lived elsewhere were then claiming to be displaced / suffered harm (wanting ££) - when it was actually their not-legal tenants who were displaced /harmed. It was a scandal how many people lived in building who were not expected to be there and that the expected council tenants lived elsewhere. Scammers & thieves.

It’s the scammers that distract from other issues like the lack of integrated smoke alarms, and various other tenant issues & building management & cladding issues.

SnickersAndRipples · 15/02/2025 00:58

MercurialButton · 15/02/2025 00:55

I recall some of the issue was that council tenants were subletting their council flat, making money renting it to others whilst the real council tenant lived elsewhere. Some The people who lived elsewhere were then claiming to be displaced / suffered harm (wanting ££) - when it was actually their not-legal tenants who were displaced /harmed. It was a scandal how many people lived in building who were not expected to be there and that the expected council tenants lived elsewhere. Scammers & thieves.

It’s the scammers that distract from other issues like the lack of integrated smoke alarms, and various other tenant issues & building management & cladding issues.

Yes, exactly.

Franjipanl8r · 15/02/2025 01:00

soupyspoon · 14/02/2025 22:25

There are numerous tragedies where the bodies and remains are somewhere on the site but we do clear the site, this isnt unique

It does need to come down and a different memorial built in its place.

There are other memorials that are created from the remains of a terrible tragedy like this one:

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25643103.amp

if you’ve lost someone in a tragedy that’s caused by other human neglect or wrongdoing, it’s important not to be erased.

The Sahara memorial seen from space - BBC News

On 19 September 1989 UTA flight 772 was blown up over the Sahara desert, killing all 170 people on board. Where it fell, the families of the victims have created a remote memorial which is visible on satellite images.

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25643103.amp

Franjipanl8r · 15/02/2025 01:05

MercurialButton · 15/02/2025 00:55

I recall some of the issue was that council tenants were subletting their council flat, making money renting it to others whilst the real council tenant lived elsewhere. Some The people who lived elsewhere were then claiming to be displaced / suffered harm (wanting ££) - when it was actually their not-legal tenants who were displaced /harmed. It was a scandal how many people lived in building who were not expected to be there and that the expected council tenants lived elsewhere. Scammers & thieves.

It’s the scammers that distract from other issues like the lack of integrated smoke alarms, and various other tenant issues & building management & cladding issues.

The real scandal was the government official who said “show me the bodies” when they were told time and time again that flammable cladding should be banned on high rise buildings as it was dangerous. As was the corrupt insulation manufacturers who lied about safety certificates. And the contractors who sub-contracted out all responsibility without oversight. NONE of the issue was the tenants. Read the enquiry before you blame the victims.

SnickersAndRipples · 15/02/2025 01:06

Franjipanl8r · 15/02/2025 01:05

The real scandal was the government official who said “show me the bodies” when they were told time and time again that flammable cladding should be banned on high rise buildings as it was dangerous. As was the corrupt insulation manufacturers who lied about safety certificates. And the contractors who sub-contracted out all responsibility without oversight. NONE of the issue was the tenants. Read the enquiry before you blame the victims.

Nobody is blaming the victims.

penguinta · 15/02/2025 01:09

SnickersAndRipples · 14/02/2025 22:25

Agreed. It seems that the victims and relatives of Grenfell have been given a huge amount of consideration already but they seem to expect to have influence over the future of the site which victims of other tragedies don’t expect or get.
No mention is ever made of the fact that a lot of the flats were illegally subletted and letted to illegal immigrants. That’s why it was so difficult to trace who was actually living there

One of the most heartless things I have ever read.

MercurialButton · 15/02/2025 01:11

Needmorelego · 15/02/2025 00:53

@MercurialButton it's not a terrible area for a park or garden. It's actually probably a perfect area. It's in a corner surrounded by a sports centre (which has a nice cafe that literally faces it), a school and other housing. I assume the play park at the back of the building is actually still there - but obviously not useable at the moment.
It could make a really nice garden area with a memorial, play area, picnic seats etc.

My reference is Maxilla Garden, just nearby. Recently renovated. A bit nicer than it was, but hardly a “really nice” area. There’s benches. And nice plantings but the people who use the benches aren’t “really nice”. Popular with XL Bully dogs & fur-daddies playing tug of war with a rope or chain.

It’s a location where a park would need to be locked at dusk. If the park housed a “memorial” it would need to be … durable.

SnickersAndRipples · 15/02/2025 01:11

penguinta · 15/02/2025 01:09

One of the most heartless things I have ever read.

How so?

Franjipanl8r · 15/02/2025 01:16

I’ve reported this thread. There are some absolutely disgusting comments suggesting “illegal immigrants” were in some way to blame for this tragedy. Read the Grenfell enquiry reports if you want to know who was to blame.

SnickersAndRipples · 15/02/2025 01:18

Franjipanl8r · 15/02/2025 01:16

I’ve reported this thread. There are some absolutely disgusting comments suggesting “illegal immigrants” were in some way to blame for this tragedy. Read the Grenfell enquiry reports if you want to know who was to blame.

No one has suggested that illegal immigrants are to blame. How could they possibly be?

MercurialButton · 15/02/2025 01:18

there is a “small quantity” of unidentified remains, at the Coroners Office. (Jan 2025 news)

They are not still in the tower.

Ger1atricMillennial · 15/02/2025 01:28

From what I understand any prosecutions will be announced in 2026. As there are so many parties involved it makes sense it has taken this long to work out who knew what and who did or didn't know what.

I can also see as there hasn't been actual or percieved any justice for the death of the 71(!) people then any plans to remove the building will feel premature to them as if its just being swept under the rug.

The sad truth is that it will have to come down at some point as it will be a risk of causing further harm. I wonder whether it would be good to discuss what would the community have to happen to make them feel like they have justice for this tragedy, i.e. what would have to be done in order for the building to be removed.

penguinta · 15/02/2025 01:28

SnickersAndRipples · 15/02/2025 01:11

How so?

You need it spelling out to you? Where to begin? Firstly the victims of the fire and their families have been treated appallingly. How many arrests have been made? The idea that they have been given ‘a huge amount of consideration’ is ludicrous.

The need to mention that people living there were doing so illegally which has absolutely no bearing on their right to not die in the most brutal way imaginable in a ticking time bomb that was wrapped in kindling to make it less of an eyesore for the rich neighbours.

Ger1atricMillennial · 15/02/2025 01:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Franjipanl8r · 15/02/2025 01:35

Read the book “show me the bodies” if you want to understand the level of corruption and injustice that lead to 72 lives being lost, including children. The tower needs to stay until these victim’s families get some kind of justice.

penguinta · 15/02/2025 01:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You’re right ☹️

Ger1atricMillennial · 15/02/2025 01:36

penguinta · 15/02/2025 01:35

You’re right ☹️

What do you think about the next steps with Grenfell

SnickersAndRipples · 15/02/2025 01:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

A lot of people are looking to be outraged without actually reading what I have said.
And no, I am not a troll.

MercurialButton · 15/02/2025 01:40

Ger1atricMillennial · 15/02/2025 01:28

From what I understand any prosecutions will be announced in 2026. As there are so many parties involved it makes sense it has taken this long to work out who knew what and who did or didn't know what.

I can also see as there hasn't been actual or percieved any justice for the death of the 71(!) people then any plans to remove the building will feel premature to them as if its just being swept under the rug.

The sad truth is that it will have to come down at some point as it will be a risk of causing further harm. I wonder whether it would be good to discuss what would the community have to happen to make them feel like they have justice for this tragedy, i.e. what would have to be done in order for the building to be removed.

Starmer and his mate Hermer are more interested in Shemima Begum, Gerry Adams, random people in Chagos than anyone here in UK …. Loads of money to be made apparently from donations etc

No prosecutions:
Grooming gangs Rotherham
School abuse scandal (Hesley Group Rotherham)
Grenfell
Etc

Starting to think it’s like USA before Trump, some weird obsession with gov giving justice & money & citizenship to others & not citizens.

Whilst their own people … they do NOT give a sheet.

user9876543211 · 15/02/2025 01:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Ger1atricMillennial · 15/02/2025 01:43

MercurialButton · 15/02/2025 01:40

Starmer and his mate Hermer are more interested in Shemima Begum, Gerry Adams, random people in Chagos than anyone here in UK …. Loads of money to be made apparently from donations etc

No prosecutions:
Grooming gangs Rotherham
School abuse scandal (Hesley Group Rotherham)
Grenfell
Etc

Starting to think it’s like USA before Trump, some weird obsession with gov giving justice & money & citizenship to others & not citizens.

Whilst their own people … they do NOT give a sheet.

So what would you like the next steps to be for Grenfell. What would make you think that they do care about the UK?