I have recieved this reply -
Dear X
Thank you for your message urging support for a written declaration, by the
EU's consultative assembly, in favour of an EU-system for reporting missing
children.
Such written declarations have no legal force, and each one is acclaimed, or
ignored, by the EU's un-elected bodies (Commission, Council and Court - where
all power in the EU resides) depending upon whether the subject is already part
of their programme, or not. In this way, such declarations either give
publicity to existing programmes or have no effect at all.
UKIP's representatives in this assembly do not subscribe to EU-legislation of
any kind, including written declarations, because none of the EU's bodies is
democratic - not even the assembly (which, although elected, has no general
electorate - only compartmentalised electorates, which are largely ignorant of
one another's views)
European coöperation, furthermore, is rather hindered, than helped, by the
centralised bureaucracies of the EU, which, by abolishing national frontiers,
have made EU-territory a playground for all types of crime, and which, in
general, are rather intent on extending their powers than on governing wisely
and well. This is only to be expected of an organisation, which lacks all
democratic accountability.
Indeed, the only way the huge, multilingual territories of the EU can be
governed is by means of a repressive police-state, where every identity, asset
and movement is monitored. When such powers are in the hands of a non-
democratic government - as will soon be the case, if the Lisbon Treaty is
ratified - then the resulting structure can only be described as totalitarian.
It seems most unlikely that the proposed EU-network would be used only for
reporting missing children, when such a system could easily be used for
reporting all "missing" (or wanted) persons; and that, I believe, is the other
end of the wedge. The EU always starts with some fine-seeming, "cuddly"
initiative, which gradually hardens into something, which is not "cuddly" at
all.
The American "Amber Alert-System" is quite different. Note, on its website - www.amberalert.gov/ - how it disclaims any "endorsement or recommendation of the United States Government" and describes itself as a "voluntary partnership between law-enforcement agencies, broadcasters, transportation agencies, and the wireless industry". That is not how the EU operates.
There is no reason why border-controls should not be restored nor why national
police-forces should not coöperate in circulating lists of missing children;
but we cannot restore border-controls, while the EU exists, and we do not need
EU-government to institute coöperation between police-forces.
As usual, the EU is using an emotive issue, which could be better dealt with by
other means, to promote its policy of total domination by non-democratic
institutions. I hope you will see through this facade to the unpleasant
reality it hides.
Yours sincerely
X