Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Woman, 57, thought she had cancer until doctors told her she was 30 weeks pregnant

118 replies

TheBlonde · 22/03/2008 08:07

Woman, 57, thought she had cancer until doctors told her she was 30 weeks pregnant

She did have IVF though

OP posts:
WalnutEGGshell · 23/03/2008 16:52

What about in the situation clueless describes below - her father's wife may die young leaving him with care of a young child. (obv hope this is not the case clueless!)

juuule · 23/03/2008 16:53

My mil is 75 with no health problems. Dh grandad was still gardening (heavy spade work included) at 90. Should they have been/be preparing for their dotage at 55? Is it a question of health or age?

WalnutEGGshell · 23/03/2008 16:53

"Oh, Walnut, you must be one of those older wiser people.

I bow to your font of knowledge."

I didn't realise I required a font of knowledge to comment. You have stated your opinion, as have I. Quite civilly I might add.

expatinscotland · 23/03/2008 16:56

As have I.

But I keep forgetting how things have become here lately.

Mea culpa.

Swedes · 23/03/2008 16:57

They have matching moccasins, albeit in different colours. I couldn't take my eyes off them.

expatinscotland · 23/03/2008 16:58

It's a question of the fact that people who are post-menopausal needs LOTS of expensive intervention and someone else's eggs to get pregnant, juule, because from a biological standpoint, they are too old to do so.

Cammelia · 23/03/2008 16:59

Health at an advanced age doesn't mean you have the energy to deal with young children.

QuintessentiallyAnEmptyCave · 23/03/2008 16:59

Juuule, I am not patronising you at all, but you must be very young?

Retrospect is a good thing, I bet your inlaws aren't exactly thinking, "shame we are so healthy, we could easily had another child at 57" My dad is 81 and in a wheelchair, he still gardens. Doesnt make him fit to father young children.

WalnutEGGshell · 23/03/2008 16:59

expat -

It's no bad thing to have something interesting to debate on MN, sometimes it gets a bit too trivial.

WalnutEGGshell · 23/03/2008 17:00

lol swedes! perhaps trivial is preferable after all

expatinscotland · 23/03/2008 17:01

Is IVF on post-menopausal women allowed in the UK?

All these people go abroad, IIRC.

One, the Romanian lady, even lied about her age to a European clinic.

Cammelia · 23/03/2008 17:02

Also bad taste in carpet

TheBlonde · 23/03/2008 17:12

According to the article: "There is no absolute age limit for IVF in Britain, but the NHS will not fund it for women over 40.

In practice most private fertility clinics in the UK will not treat women over 50 - the average age of the menopause when they stop producing eggs. "

I think 57 is too old

OP posts:
Calisteregg · 23/03/2008 17:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

WalnutEGGshell · 23/03/2008 17:21

interesting that NHS policy makes it a financial privilege over 40

juuule · 23/03/2008 17:25

Not patronising at all, Quint. Quite flattering really.

No, I don't think my mil would have been happy to find out she was expecting at 57. She did bring up 5 of her own which was more than enough for her (her words). However, she did look after 4 of my nieces/nephews full-time from the age of 60 to 65/67 after which she decided she wanted to do other things.
I'm sure if she hadn't had any children and having a child was the thing she wanted to do she would have been quite capable of doing so.

qjbtc · 23/03/2008 17:41

Never mind a baby at 57, I would be more concerned about a teenager at 70+. The woman is clearly mad !!!!!

QuintessentiallyAnEmptyCave · 23/03/2008 17:41

Thank you gjbtc, that is the exact point I have been trying to make....

juuule · 23/03/2008 17:43

Ah well people often say I'm mad for having 9, so perhaps that's why I feel a little more lenient towards this couple.

qjbtc · 23/03/2008 17:54

I only say this because I found baby and toddler stage a breeze compared to teenager stage. Can't imagine doing it at 70+ its stressful enough at 40+!!! And mine arn't bad kids either but you don' stop worrying because they are older and you have much less control.

WalnutEGGshell · 23/03/2008 17:55

but of course you can't just apply your own experiences to everyone's elses situation, that would be terribly narrow - at least, if you do, you have to be aware of it

juuule · 23/03/2008 18:02

Very true, Walnut.

expatkat · 23/03/2008 18:03

You know, (and I'm not sure what I'm about to say is exactly the same thing as what we're talking about) but never underestimate the power of denial. I was first pregnant (but miscarried early) 10 years ago. I was throwing up all the time; my nipples turned brown; stomach wasn't flattening despite my inability to eat. I thought it was just nerves!

then, my second pregnancy, which resulted in my ds, started similarly. I had nausea and a funny feeling of fullness. I thought I'd cancer or something else terminal and awful, so I went to the doctor. He asked if I could be pregnant and I said no. He said take a test anyway. And it was positive! And I'd been trying for a baby. So why didn't pregnancy occur to me? So odd.

But back to the OP: yes how WEIRD.

pruners · 23/03/2008 18:18

Message withdrawn

qjbtc · 23/03/2008 18:28

I don't neccessarily think she's wrong. Hey it's her life and I'm sure her circumstances are completely different from mine. All I was saying was I don't envy her having to cope with a teenager in her 70s. But maybe her child will be a model teenager.

And of course my opinions are influenced by my experiences. I don't see how they could not be.

Swipe left for the next trending thread