The problem we have is that what the inquiry is showing is that any system is only functional if well maintained. We had a series of structural changes and deteriorations, which were then seriously exacerbated by deeply unsuitable personalities being in key roles at key times.
Deteriorations since 2010: cuts to NHS, cuts to civil service, CAMHS, schools budgets, LA budgets, ICU beds, PHE budgets, decision not to update PPE stocks, police cuts, increased poverty generally. Plus the lack of adequate scenario preparedness planning prior to the pandemic.
Then we have a PM who is not up to the job, supported by a senior advisor who openly thinks the entire civil service, the cabinet, the NHS leadership are all stupid and not to be listened to. The people around the cabinet table were not focused and their motivations were not right.
Factions abound, in-fighting, inappropriate conversations, no single source of truth/data, no single decision-making body, no respect for expertise at home or abroad, a dogmatic opposition to NPIs, and a desire not to provide financial resources to low paid people to mitigate COVID impacts. Plus an obsession with the Mayor in Jaws. Plus a desire to deal with BREXIT rather than the coming threat.
If you compare the UK response to other nations it was poor because we were scrabbling. Even the fairly OK bits like furlough - was designed in a rush, has been very wasteful and gave out more money than was needed whilst leaving 3m outside the scheme and some became destitute. Germany's was much better because it was properly designed and ready to go as part of their pandemic preparedness.
I agree The Thick of It feels sane compared to what we actually watched.