Came across this in the Sunday Herald. Pretty much sums it up for.
Derek Conway is theving lying scum, and the sooner he is is jailed for embezzlement the better. And is wife and sons can be done for being accesories, and failure to inform police or whatever.
'-----
Poor people steal, but the rich practise creative accountancy
By Tom Shields
A TORY MP is caught paying £82,000 from public funds in wages to his Hooray Henry sons; money for which they had done little or no work. The MP is suspended for 10 days on full pay. He is ordered to repay £13,000, leaving a nice little profit of £69,000 from this creative accountancy.
But he did say sorry to the House of Commons. He said: "The committee the committee on standards and privileges; that's as in many privileges and few standards was entitled to reach the conclusions that it did and I have accepted its criticisms in full. I unreservedly apologise to the House for my administrative shortcomings and the misjudgements I made."
The MP will be allowed to sit out the remaining time (potentially until May 2010) of this parliament, receiving £120,000 in wages and God knows how much extra in expenses.
Meanwhile, not so long ago, a Glasgow single mother appeared at Glasgow Sheriff Court after claiming £18,000 in housing benefits to which she was not entitled. She admitted making the false applications after her husband left her. She used the money to pay her mortgage so that she would not have to leave the area and move her autistic son from his special-needs school.
She was jailed for a year. Sheriff Charles McFarlane QC opined: "This is a serious matter which resulted in collecting a significant amount of money for a considerable time. A custodial sentence is the only one for what was a blatant crime on your part." The woman collapsed as she was led down to the cells.
The two cases are similar in that the parents indulged in administrative shortcomings for the sake of their children. Derek Conway MP did so to fund a champagne lifestyle for his sons Freddie and Henry. The woman, who shall remain nameless since she has suffered enough, took the money to make life a little more bearable for her son. In neither case did the punishment fit the crime.