Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

David Blunkett affair

227 replies

Tinker · 28/11/2004 15:58

Sad lonely man? None of our business? Discuss?

Must say, it would be more believable if she were the blind partner

OP posts:
misdee · 28/11/2004 16:01

]

tbh, i;m not worried about it. if the kids are his then he has the right to see them surely. are they his? arent they?

i give up.

morningpaper · 28/11/2004 16:01

lol! how rude!

JanH · 28/11/2004 16:04

None of our business but fat chance of us not being informed. Sad lonely man too - they spent a lot of time together - she doesn't want DNA testing, what does that say? I agree with misdee.

Easy · 28/11/2004 16:10

I think this is just like the business with Boris Johnson last week.
On the one hand, what someone does in their private lives shouldn't be any of our business.

BUT

If these guys can't act with decorum, discretion and respectability in their own lives, what are we doing letting them have a controlling interest in OUR lives?
And make no bones about it, David Blunkett has a VERY controlling interest in our lives.

lima · 28/11/2004 16:52

easy - so how come Boris got sacked from his parliamentary role, but David is still there in a much more prominent role than Boris.

What a double standard

prufrock · 28/11/2004 17:32

Boris didn't get sacked for having an affair - he got sacked for blatantly lying about it. DB has never denied the affair.

VFeist · 28/11/2004 17:44

I guess that Blunkett is much more precious to Tony Blair than Boris was to Michael Howard!

pupuce · 28/11/2004 17:46

Prufrock surely Boris is not the 1st man to deny an affair.... would you own up to your boss?

prufrock · 28/11/2004 17:51

If I knew that it was in the public domain - ie if a newspaper had asked me if it was true, then yes I probably would. I obviously wouldn't volunteer the information, but I wouldn't see the point in lying if I was going to be found out.

JanH · 28/11/2004 18:18

Anyway Blunko isn't married.

Caligula · 28/11/2004 20:58

But the woman he was having an affair was, was. Or was she?

Haven't followed this one very closely. It's moved on from affair to visa applications. All very confusing.

JanH · 28/11/2004 21:01

Yes, she was/is. But his situation is still somewhat different from Boris's, for that reason as well as others.

codswallop · 28/11/2004 21:09

she is a horrib;e person IMO apprently
it says int he times today that if she was dead in a coffin , she would be wondering if there was anynone more interesting to lie next to!!

how can she have an affair for threee years htrough two pg?
poor husband

codswallop · 28/11/2004 21:10

blunkett has also used his oitition to get her benefits

JanH · 28/11/2004 21:11

allegedly, coddy.

Caligula · 28/11/2004 21:12

She had an affair through 2 pregnancies? How very energetic of her. So these babies - are they Blunkett's or her DH's?

How humiliating for her DH. He should horsewhip Blunkett. How did this all come to light? (I really haven't been following this story! - how on earth have I missed it?!)

JanH · 28/11/2004 21:23

Well according to the Observer "It is also alleged that Blunkett and Fortier have already obtained private DNA test results that prove her two-year-old son William was fathered by Blunkett." (Article.)

He had been the soul of discretion really until she dumped him.

Caligula · 28/11/2004 21:26

Sounds horrific. Poor old husband.

aloha · 28/11/2004 22:07

Poor kids. Poor husband. What a mess. Can't believe how she kept the whole show on the road for three years, almost her whole marriage, and went on holiday with Blunkett. What did her husband think she was doing? Extraordinary business.
Husband is, I've been told by people who have met him, a very nice man.

pupuce · 28/11/2004 22:09

what was she doing/thinking????

miggy · 28/11/2004 22:26

Personally think that if someone (DB) has that little control over their behavior they should not have control over my life.

  1. he had an affair with a married woman either 2)he had an affair with a married pregnant woman or 3) he fathered a child to a woman recently married to someone else
  2. he behaved with complete indiscretion and no regard to the poor husband at the end of the affair
  3. he may have used his position to the benefit of his mistress I know we are supposed to be a liberal society but Im sorry, I think this is appaling behaviour, millions of times worse than Boris Johnson, and yet there seems to be no governmental response.
miggy · 28/11/2004 22:27

Yes-her behaviour is shameful but she isnt the home sec!

princesspeahead · 28/11/2004 22:39

is there much moral difference between being married and having an affair, and having an affair with someone you know to be married?

and if not (as I believe), then why should boris be sacked and blunkett kept in his job? and don't say it is about lying, please don't tell me that blunkett had a mistress who was married to another man and who had two children, paternity unknown, without him lying to someone sometime!!

pupuce · 28/11/2004 22:43

Well Boris' sacking was not just about lying over his affair.... surely.... there are other issues.....

aloha · 28/11/2004 22:54

I do think the whole thing is unbelievably sleazy. But imagine being pregnant and have this played out in every newspaper - horrific! I personally would love Blunkett to go, for many, many reasons, of which his affair is the least important. But that's a whole different thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread