I’m in late 50s. I don’t have an objection to resitting a driving test at say 70, but how will that help when condition could come on literally the day after the test.
To be effective you’d really need to have a test every year…there aren’t enough test centres or inspectors to cope with that - particularly in an ageing population.
So the best solution would be an online test that can be done at home. Right now there are still many elderly that can’t cope with that or don’t have access to a computer at all. It would penalise people who can still drive safely (with years of muscle memory to cope with that technology) but get freaked out and flustered or confused at something on line or using technology they aren’t used to. I certainly am inexperienced and crap with online games and have crap eye hand coordination, but could see that a simulation environment test format could be an excellent way to go if it wasn’t for incompetence like me.
I certainly think the laws need to be tightened to say it is an offence to NOT report someone who you believe should not be driving. This isn’t just aimed at elderly but to people who are still drinking/drugs and driving, people you suspect have sleep apnea etc. posters in here saying their elderly relative refused to stop driving, we can understand why as it is loss of independence. But really it should be a crime not to report someone you believe may have issues- the police should be empowered to do a quick assessment of the situation and be able to refer person to resit a test in the same way as you get referred to speed awareness course.
There is little pressure to invest money in tests specifically aimed at the elderly. Statistics are a tadge confusing, but there is no evidence to support that elderly drivers cause MORE accidents than any other group, and the 17-24 year olds still cause the most accidents. There is a perception that we have loads of unsafe elderly drivers because the press publicise these stories where someone has been killed by elderly person - the other crash down the road caused by joe blogs on his way home to his family in a bit of a hurry doesn’t make national headlines.
We don’t for instance create special tests for male drivers even though statistically they cause a lot more accidents than female drivers Or elderly drivers. If we go the route of special testing, then first we need to improve testing and teaching to eliminate the danger of young and inexperienced drivers, who at that age think they are invincible
I was quite excited at the prospect of self drive cars. I felt this was the ultimate solution to allow elderly their independence but keep the roads safe. Clearly the latest stories aren’t good about their safety but it is early days still. I think the technology involved in that could be used and mandated for all drivers in certain risk groups such as the elderly, young male etc. These sort of inbuilt safety devices that self drive cars have had to be developed could be used to overrule manual drivers where they’ve not taken action fast enough. Some of them like acc are already in place but there’s not enough education to explain how much safer it is to drive with them on than off
however, yet again there are people who don’t want to be told how to drive their car and who have a powerful lobby to stop these safety features being mandated .
so we are where we are for now.