Vardy has lost

[RedWingBoots]

That's all. 😂

She's the type of woman that would shag your man then blame it on you for not showing your man enough affection!
I'm so glad she is now seen as the bitch she is

Vardy will have to go and play in China and she can try to become an influencer over there. Nothing for her here now.

wonder if Caroline watt will surface with her version in due course?

Just read the summary judgement, ouch Becky!

I know, it's a bit brutal isn't it. Basically stating that RV is dishonest, delusional and a tad dim

I agree.

But I also read a comment that said ( and I paraphrase ) she was so upset by Vardy's betrayal and yet her husband has betrayed her quite a few times and she doesn't go on social media commenting on that.

Which is a harsh fair comment.

Rebekah was very badly advised to go ahead.

Remember Caroline Flack..
it won't be easy for the Vardys.

Arrogance. And the assumption that everyone else is as thick as her.

Good. The laugh of it is, had she denied it and shrugged it off back in 2019 people would have (mostly) forgotten all about it. She’s made it infinitely worse for herself, against the advice of her own advisors, and for that I have no sympathy.

"The Court found that it was necessary to treat the Claimant’s evidence with very
considerable caution, determining that significant parts of her evidence were not
credible. There were many occasions when the Claimant’s evidence was manifestly
inconsistent with the contemporaneous documentary evidence, evasive or implausible"

In other words, Vardy lied.

It goes on to say that it was judged that the fact that a large part of evidence went missing (phone dropped in sea) was deliberate, not accidental.

Knowing this, what possessed her to turn down an out of court settlement?
Sheer vanity I guess! Or pride. Just like Jonathan Aitken.

😁

But I also read a comment that said ( and I paraphrase ) she was so upset by Vardy's betrayal and yet her husband has betrayed her quite a few times and she doesn't go on social media commenting on that

But LadyEloise1 the state of Colleen Rooney's marriage is an entirely private matter and one which she has the right to make decisions about privately. This case was about a third party making CR's private business, public, without CR's permission. And doing so for monetary reward. Yes they are both serious betrayals and CR has responded in a private way to one, and fought for privacy in another! Imho, that is not inconsistent at all! It is no one's business but her own how she chooses to respond to past issues in her primary relationship. And in terms of legalities, it has nothing whatsoever to do with this specific case!

The Judge made the right decision. All those allegedly lost text messages/lost phone by Jamie and Vardy's employee clearly showed guilt in the Vardy camp. And what we did see in the text messages disclosed shows that Vardy was very jealous of Colleen.

Colleen was forced to defend this action as Vardy sued her but Vardy made the decision to proceed with it which in retrospect seems to be professional suicide for her. The Judge's decision clearly shows a liar - not great for the Vardy's.

Don't be kind - she dragged other people, whether you like them or not, into her crap.

She’ll find a way to tell herself she won.

No kindness intended I think she's a right dickhead. I was just in agreement with the PP, that the judge had pulled no punches in her summation.

I love that this story appears in the BBC's "entertainment and arts" section of the news site

😂😂

She has already come out with the judge is wrong.

I expected this to be a shorter version 😂

Yep. People who lie habitually because of a failing with their personality never understand the old saying ‘you can fool some of the people some of the time but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time’

She probably has herself surrounded by people who let her get on with her nonsense because it’s ‘just the way she is’ but then they take a step out into the real world and it’s a different story. People see her for what she is.

Apologies for quoting the Daily Mail but the arrogance and sheer stupidity involved in thinking that making huge chunks of evidence disappear is mind blowing! It's worse than "the dog ate my homework your honour. And if you are going to lie to a High Court judge, it's best to get your dates right... .

"The judgement reveals for the first time, Caroline Watt's full first-hand explanation about how she managed to drop her mobile phone into the North Sea, blaming a combination of 'choppy waters' and a weakness in her hand.

She recalled in her witness statement: 'It is the case that I accidentally dropped my phone while I was on a boat trip in August this year.

'This was a genuine accident which happened during a family holiday to Scotland. I have a weakness in my hand and was on a boat trip with my family.

'I was standing up in choppy waters holding my phone and I dropped my phone when the boat hit a wave. This was an uninsured phone and its loss was extremely inconvenient and expensive for me.'

It was also extremely inconvenient for the case.

She added: 'However, I don't believe its loss makes any difference to the information I am able to provide the Court.

'As I understand it, all the information on the phone was retained on iCloud and transferred to my new phone which I have provided for imaging.

'The only information which would not have been on iCloud is records of WhatsApp messages and calls, but my WhatsApp messages had already been routinely deleted back in 2019 way before the proceedings began.'.

But the sharp-eyed judge was not convinced. She pointed out: 'But the evidence indicates that Ms Watt had not deleted her WhatsApp messages in 2019

'On 25 November 2020, Ms Watt sent Ms Vardy two screenshots of WhatsApp messages between them from 16 August 2019 (including the images of Ms Rooney's posts).

'There is no reason that Ms Watt would have taken a screenshot of these messages prior to the start of the litigation. Nor is there any reason why Ms Watt would have retained these messages while routinely deleting all others.

'Ms Watt sent these messages when she did because she evidently considered they would assist Ms Vardy's case.

'It is likely that the WhatsApp chat between herself and Ms Vardy (as well as exchanges with journalists) was available on Ms Watt's phone when she was advised very shortly after the Reveal Post that such evidence must be preserved.'"

😄😄😄

Sorry, "in thinking that making huge chunks of evidence would help their case ...is mind-blowing"!

Omg I can't type! In making huge chunks of evidence disappear would help their case!

It was always going to be this outcome. RV would have been constantly advised not to do this. Even when she launched the ridiculous missive she was given opportunities to settle but refused to do so.

it defies belief as to why she ever went down this route in the first place. Arrogance, stupidity and a wholly unrealistic sense of her own self worth, coupled with the fact she obviously thought she could lie and deny and that would be sufficient. But given that she employed top legal representation it makes it even more difficult to understand how she ever thought she would win as she would have been advised against pursuing this.

Any form of reputation she had (and blimey I say this loosely) was trashed during the hearing. But her husband, whilst worth several millions, isn’t in the league of others and is at the end of his playing days that bankrolls their lifestyle. Having to settle this case is very costly and represents a significant amount of his acquired wealth. Not only has she lost the case that was ever going to be thus, she’s depleted a significant amount of “their” wealth which isn’t going to now be replaced. Nobody is going to touch her with a barge pole now and his own endorsements/sponsors, if he had any, aren’t going to touch him either going forward. Take into account the chanting of opposing supporters, his age etc and he’s not exactly a good fit for continuing his own football career.

The fact that she didn’t have to do any of this, it would have all been forgotten years ago etc makes it beyond comprehension as to why she ever thought it was a good idea in the first place.

I agree it is incomprehensible why she would keep pursuing this, probably against legal advice. It’s as though pride wouldn’t let her admit any fault to herself. And I totally agree that the financial implications are potentially devastating. And a big blow for a marriage to take. And you feel for her dc too.

Overall though, I think it was the contempt she showed towards the court and the judicial process that is mind-boggling. Concealing that much evidence and thinking there wouldn’t be any repercussions from the judge! That’s either arrogant or plain stupid!

I enjoyed reading every detail of the judgement. A more damning assessment of a witness would be difficult to imagine. Enormously satisfying to have her so publicly branded as the noxious piece of work that she is.

Me too.

It's not just that Vardy lost. It's that the judge pointed out all the inconsistencies and holes in her story and made it very, VERY clear what her view of Vardy was. The judge's summing up was factual and draws on all the evidence to take Vardy's character to pieces. It's brilliant in its understated savagery.

This case really does highlight the arrogance of the woman, and the extent to which she was willing to go to get herself in the papers, and in their good books. She's pond life, no better than the gutter press. I really hope she'll slink off back to whatever rock Jamie Vardy found her under, but I suspect her ego will tell her that she's a wronged woman and she'll find another sucker to put her back on TV.