www.itv.com/news/granada/2022-07-21/pensioner-who-killed-wife-in-suicide-pact-calls-for-law-change?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR1ETDQNfb1DFNtznBTAi__qpBa-ivcvynJSwwAFXzaP3gFv6nRnyvsS_YU#Echobox=1658433729
A 71yo man slit the throat of his wife, who had cancer, and then tried (but failed) to kill himself. He claims this was a suicide pact.
he was found not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter earlier this week. He is now apparently campaigning for a change in the law around assisted suicide.
Now this case has utterly perplexed me. The UK definition of manslaughter is:
”a person is guilty of involuntary manslaughter when he or she intends an unlawful act that is likely to do harm to the person, and death results which was neither foreseen nor intended”
He did intend to kill so I’m not sure how that works out.
He’s getting loads of support on social media and some very supportive comments from the judge.
Personally I just don’t get it - ”assisted suicide” in such a violent and painful way, followed by the suicide of someone who is NOT terminally ill is not, IMO, a good example of why the law should change. I don’t necessarily disagree with the principles of assisted suicide, I think if we must have it it should be heavily regulated. This man says “nobody should have to go what we went through”. But he wasn’t ill, and it was such a horribly painful death for her. And being unable to live without your spouse, as he claims, can’t possibly be a good enough reason to have to legally commit suicide.
Am I the only one who thinks this is a horrific case and can’t understand why he’s getting so much support?!