"we also have to keep in mind where the average daily wage in a country is a dollar,we then cant be shocked that some people are only earning this amount for producing clothes."
But the workers are apparently paid barely enough to buy food each day, and as the companies dont pay tax (the factories are in tax free zones) no money goes back into the local economies. And when their 5 years tax free period is up they close and re-open under another name.
I read 'No Logo' lately by naomi klein and was v shocked.
But it is very hard to figure out the solution when you have a family to clothe on a limited budget.
Apparently the average person now buys 40 garments per year...used to be much much less when clothes were pricier....so oxfam is so swamped with second hand gear they ship it all to africa..so seamstresses in africa cant make a living either now as theres so much second hand stuff sent for europe.
But I do feel theres this huge thing these days were everyone has to have everything looking just great these days, the house, the clothes....people used to look shit a lot of the time when I was younger I am sure!!! And they lived in crappy houses with ugly furniture. I mean I know thats a total generalisation but does anyone know what I mean? Wine was for special occasions and as for restaurants...! The country is awash with money, mostly borrowed probably. Can we start an 'its ok to look crap and have crap stuff' movement?
And what is the story with Dunnes (related to m+s) their label always says SA..someone told me that was a spanish factory? Is it true they can just be finished off in Europe and then labelled from there?