Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

More nuclear power for Britain

59 replies

Eleusis · 21/05/2007 15:32

link{http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6674415.stm"Britain will need nuclear power"}

There a nice little calculator to play to see how your adjustment will affect our future energy requirements.

OP posts:
Eleusis · 21/05/2007 15:32

Bugger
"Britain will need nuclear power"

OP posts:
ZoeC · 21/05/2007 15:33

"Britain will need nuclear power"

ZoeC · 21/05/2007 15:33

sorry cross posted!

Eleusis · 21/05/2007 16:41

Well, this is a popular thread.

OP posts:
Callisto · 21/05/2007 17:35

There is a lot of important stuff not being discussed atm because of the obsession with Madeleine McCann. It is crazy imo.

So, nuclear power. Where do you stand on it Eleusis?

ruty · 21/05/2007 17:36

I think the govt are in the pockets of the nuclear industry. But if i say anything DC will come on and start ranting so best stay away.

SueBaroo · 21/05/2007 17:44

I used to be dead set against it, but I'm not really sure as I've got older.

Nightynight · 21/05/2007 18:02

ffs why cant we have wind power without people moaning about windmills spoiling their pretty views. Give'em a nuclear power station instead and see how they like that. Lets have one in the home counties.

ruty · 21/05/2007 18:14

Exactly NN. so nice to have something we can agree on.

Nightynight · 21/05/2007 18:16
Grin
Eleusis · 21/05/2007 20:16

I think that nuclear power is probably our only existing viable alternative to fossil fuels. I also am very concerned about Russia's increasing power over the West. We are becoming more and more dependant on Russia for our oil. And that scares me.

OP posts:
Eleusis · 21/05/2007 20:17

Oh, but I do agree that people who complain about the wind farm impact on their pretty lanscape are being rather silly. Seems a small price to pay.

OP posts:
Callisto · 22/05/2007 08:30

I agree about Russia - Putin seems to get more and more bolshy and their human rights and standards of democracy seem to be getting worse and worse but that is a whole other thread.

I think that nuclear being the only meaningful alternative is absolutely right and despite the fact that I really don't like the idea of nuclear power stations I can't actually disagree with Golden Brown on this one. Getting away from dependancy on any other nation for our power requirements is our only option for the future.

Eleusis · 22/05/2007 09:09

Oh, but Callisto, it is not a whole other thread. That is just the point. We need Nuclear to get away from Russia.

How will oil get to the West when Russia controls all the pipelines. Let us not forget what happened to the Ukraine and had knock on effects in Western Europe last winter??

Russia gains control of yet another route of gas pipelines

Ad, speaking of Russia, wher the F was EU a few weeks ago when they were bullying Estonia???? LAst time I checked Estonia was part of the EU, and the EU sat there and diod nothing... What was that about? Is the EU scared of Russia?

OP posts:
Callisto · 22/05/2007 09:44

I know, the bully boy tactics that Putin employs are pretty dispicable. The Chechen journo (shamefully I have forgotten her name) who was assassinated, the dreadful treatment of all of the old ussr countries. I worried as soon as I heard that Putin was ex KGB and he has really lived up to it.

I think that the EU has finally told Putin that an attack on one EU nation is an attack on all of them but really, talk about lily-livered behaviour. It is also looking as though the CPS is going for a prosecution on the killers of Alexander Litvinenko, despite alleged govt pressure to do the opposite. We shall see.

Callisto · 22/05/2007 09:45

Actually, maybe I should be careful about slagging Putin off too much - don't want to end up drinking a cup of polonium laced tea...

Monkeytrousers · 22/05/2007 09:55

I think it's a nescessary evil at the mo.

ruty · 22/05/2007 11:14

we are creating a terrible legacy for our children in terms of badly stored nuclear waste. The funding and research into other options has not been fully exhausted because there is no financial incentive to do so.

Eleusis · 22/05/2007 11:24

Exactly, there are other possibilities for the future. But they require research and development. The only thing we have here and now is nuclear.

OP posts:
ruty · 22/05/2007 12:12

because the nuclear lobby are pushing their card and because research into other options are not financially motivated.

Eleusis · 22/05/2007 12:19

I'm all for research into other areas. But, we need to move now with current technologies.

OP posts:
Lilymaid · 22/05/2007 12:28

Home counties nuclear power stations now mainly closed down - Dungeness (Kent), Bradwell (Essex). They need to be by the sea for cooling reasons, apparently so you won't get one in Bucks. The plants will probably be largely run/set up by the French as the UK ran its nuclear industry down in the 1980s.

Callisto · 22/05/2007 13:39

The problem with a lot of the sustainables is that you don't get a big power return for a huge investment so it takes longer to see any profits. With nuclear the short-term huge investment is more quickly paid back, plus the money is there to invest in the first place. The technology is tried and tested also which brings the cost down. Unfortunately I think in 50 years time nuclear waste will be the least of our worries.

Ruty - I would be interested to see the proof to back your claim that the govt is in the pocket the nuclear industry. I don't for a minute disbelieve you, but things are not as clear cut as this imo.

Eleusis · 22/05/2007 13:53

If you are looking for a government who is in the pocket of the nucleaar industry, I suggest you turn your attention to the new President Sarkozy of France.

OP posts:
Eleusis · 22/05/2007 14:24

and looks like China is stepping up to the plate as well. here

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread