Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Grenfell Tower The Aftermath Thread SIX.

691 replies

HelenaDove · 05/07/2017 19:46

I thought i would take the oppurtunity to start thread six as thread five is now coming to an end. Thanks Thanks to all those lost in the fire their survivors families friends and volunteers.

Link to thread five which also includes links to previous threads.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/in_the_news/2959251-London-Fire-Grenfell-Tower-thread-five?pg=1

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 05/10/2019 17:59

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/oct/04/grenfell-tower-report-to-be-released-a-day-before-brexit-deadline

Grenfell Tower report to be released a day before Brexit deadline
Conclusions of public inquiry into fire that claimed 72 lives to be published on 30 October

The long-awaited public inquiry report into what happened on the night of the Grenfell Tower fire is to be released the day before Britain is due to leave the EU, which survivors and the bereaved described as “deeply frustrating”.

Conclusions about the disaster in west London on 14 June 2017, which claimed 72 lives, will be published and laid before parliament on 30 October, raising fears important lessons will be overshadowed by the possibility of a no-deal Brexit.

The chair of the inquiry, Sir Martin Moore-Bick, and his legal team have been drafting the report since the first phase of the inquiry hearing ended in December 2018. The prime minister, Boris Johnson, wrote to the retired high court judge this month saying he must publish the report no later than 30 October.

The inquiry said in a statement on Friday that core participants including the bereaved, survivors and families will receive the report 36 hours earlier “under strict embargo”.

How Grenfell survivors came together - and how Britain failed them
Read more
But Grenfell United, the group representing the survivors and bereaved, demanded it was released sooner, saying “to publish the report on 30 October risks burying it in Brexit”.

In a letter to Moore-Bick stressing the timing had caused upset to many families, the group added: “This is the most significant constitutional moment for our country in living memory. Laying the report in parliament on 30 October will guarantee that the report will not receive the attention it deserves.

We expect that your report will contain substantial findings, and make recommendations of the utmost importance. Recommendations that will bring in changes that could save lives.

Advertisement
“These must have an opportunity to be properly considered and debated in the media and parliament, if there is any hope that they will be taken up by those in authority.”

The original plan had been to publish the report this spring, but it was delayed when the team realised it was a “far more complex and time-consuming task than originally anticipated”. That led families to complain: “A slow justice is a painful justice.”

The focus of the inquiry so far has been on the events of 14 June 2017, encompassing London fire brigade’s response, the decision to order residents to stay put while fire engulfed the building, and communication between residents and 999 emergency call operators

The inquiry report is expected to draw conclusions about the leadership of the LFB, including its commissioner, Dany Cotton, who has already announced her retirement, and its preparedness for a cladding fire. Cotton angered survivors when she said planning for such an event was akin to planning for a “space shuttle landing on the Shard”.

Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more
It also investigated in detail how the fire started in a fourth-floor flat and spread to the top of the building in less than 30 minutes through the largely combustible cladding system installed in 2016.

Some of the bereaved and survivors who are core participants in the inquiry hope Moore-Bick will reach a determination about whether or not the building met building regulations, something that has remained unclear since the disaster.

The second phase of the inquiry is due to start in January and will examine the lead-up to the night of the fire, including decisions made by the owner of the 24-storey tower, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, and the landlord, the Kensington and Chelsea Tenants Management Organisation, the architects, Studio E, the contractor Rydon and material suppliers including Celotex and Arconic.

It has already taken 200,000 documents and the conclusions are not expected until at least 2021, which means any decisions on charges of manslaughter or corporate manslaughter by the Crown Prosecution Service are not likely to take place until after that"

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 25/10/2019 16:21

www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/grenfell-at-risk-of-getting-forgotten-amid-brexit-a4270796.html

hase One of the Grenfell Tower inquiry report will be published next week ( Getty Images )
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry is to publish its Phase One report on Wednesday next week — the day before the supposed Brexit deadline. Coincidence or not, this will ensure that any government response will be buried under the Brexit media avalanche.

I recently visited some of the people I’ve come to know in North Kensington over the past two years. Listening again to their stories of the fire and its aftermath, I left with the depressing feeling that not much has changed and little has been learned.

Grenfell United are known as the main group representing survivors and bereaved families. They are ordinary people, yet their experiences give them a heavy burden to bear — a realisation of the need for urgent change and a sense of debt to those who died to ensure that it never happens again.

Residential blocks around the UK remain covered in Grenfell-type cladding, yet the Australian state of Victoria has spent as much on removing it as our entire nation. Social housing tenants’ concerns are often ignored and there is little effective regulation of landlords. Grenfell United have limited resources, yet they are determined to maintain pressure on these issues.

I sat with one young mother in her flat near the shell of Grenfell. She lives in “temporary accommodation” (some in her block have been in this state for over 20 years). The block had been without hot water for many weeks, the ground floor balcony door did not lock, making the apartment vulnerable to intruders and mouse droppings littered the floor.

Because the flat was offered by the council yet administered by a housing association, it wasn’t clear where to complain. Repeated calls to the landlord had achieved little. Similar stories are found across North Kensington, with many reluctant to complain in case they are branded troublemakers.

READ MORE
Grenfell inquiry report to be published on eve of planned Brexit date
This is happening in one of the wealthiest boroughs of the country. Many feel our depleted social housing stock has become, to quote one resident, a “dumping ground for the most vulnerable”. Those we met often felt that the people responsible for housing work in an opaque, bureaucratic system that doesn’t care enough to ensure decent living conditions.

Which brings us back to Grenfell United. The changes they campaign for — stronger regulation and a proper tenant voice — should not be hard to establish. The financial crash led to tighter regulation of financial institutions, yet tenants with landlords who fail to maintain their property, rendering it unsafe, have no effective remedy.

If the inquiry report is lost under the Brexit fallout it will continue the pattern of Grenfell’s lessons being forgotten. It’s hard to imagine how that feels to those who lost loved ones. If we continue to neglect social housing, there is no guarantee it won’t happen again. If it does, we will have no excuses left.

The Rt Rev Dr Graham Tomlin is Bishop of Kensington

OP posts:
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 27/10/2019 15:52

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/oct/26/grenfell-tower-inquiry-edward-daffern-remember-us-for-change-we-bring

Grenfell Tower: ‘The fire was no accident. Now we must go after those responsible

On the eve of the first report into the tragedy, ‘prophet of Grenfell’ Edward Daffarn reveals his hopes for phase two of the inquiry
Harriet Sherwood
Harriet Sherwood

@harrietsherwood
Sat 26 Oct 2019 15.05 BSTLast modified on Sat 26 Oct 2019 19.02 BST
Shares
121
Friends and families of victims of Grenfell fire marching to the site of the disaster
Friends and families of victims of Grenfell fire marching to the site of the disaster on its first anniversary last June. Photograph: Shutterstock
In the two years and four months since the country awoke to horrific images of a burning tower block, Edward Daffarn has “lived and breathed Grenfell 24 hours a day”. Efforts to find some normality – reading a novel, going to the cinema, playing sports – have had little success. The other day, while visiting an art gallery with a cousin, a fire alarm went off. “That freaked me out. I’m not good with alarms and sirens. The only way I can escape Grenfell is by leaving the country,” he says.

For Daffarn, who escaped from the 16th floor of Grenfell Tower in the early hours of 14 June 2017, the trauma – and the battle for truth and justice – has never diminished while, inevitably, public attention has gone elsewhere. But on 30 October the first report of the public inquiry into the tragedy which claimed 72 lives will bring the appalling events of the night sharply back into focus.

“This is a very significant moment for us,” says Daffarn, 57, a key figure in Grenfell United, which represents survivors and the bereaved. He was also the co-author of a community blog that, seven months before the fire, warned: “Only a catastrophic event will expose the ineptitude and incompetence of our landlord.

Phase one of the public inquiry, chaired by the retired judge Sir Martin Moore-Bick, examined the events of the night, including how the fire started in a fourth-floor flat and spread to the top of the building in less than 30 minutes, and the response of the fire brigade and other emergency services. Phase two, due to start in January, will investigate the lead-up to the fire, including decisions made by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, the tower’s landlord, the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO), architects and contractors.

This week’s report will draw on seven months of hearings, including testimony from survivors, families and the emergency services, and 200,000 documents. “It’s very personal to us, but it’s important to the whole country. After all, we don’t live in dangerous buildings any more, but thousands of people go to sleep at night in homes effectively covered with liquid paraffin,” says Daffarn. “The fact is that this catastrophe was predictable. There was a series of forces in play that led to this. Accidents do happen, but this wasn’t an accident.”

In the hours after the blaze, Daffarn’s blog, spurred by “rage at the sheer injustice of how we were treated”, recorded some three million hits, earning him the epithet the “prophet of Grenfell”. “Everything you need to know about Grenfell is contained within the pages of that blog,” he says

He lived in Flat 134 of Grenfell Tower for 16 years. “We had a beautiful community; people from different cultural backgrounds, all different races and different financial backgrounds. We all lived in one block side by side and got along well. We often joked that the reason why we knew each other so well was because we spent so long waiting in the foyer because of the defective lifts,” he said in his witness statement to the inquiry

On the night of the fire, he was listening to the radio in bed when he heard his neighbour Joe’s smoke alarm go off. “I assumed Joe had burnt some toast or something,” his statement said. But then he heard shouting. He got out of bed, opened his door a fraction. “The whole hallway outside my flat was full of black and white smoke all mixed together.”

His instinct was to stay in the flat, but another neighbour phoned him to tell him to get out quickly. With a wet towel wrapped around his face, he opened his front door again. “I couldn’t see beyond the end of my nose … The smoke was aggressive and bellowing against me.” Panicking, disorientated, and thinking he was about to die, he was grabbed by a firefighter and helped to find the stairwell. “I ran for my life,” he told the inquiry.

Speaking to the Observer, he describes Grenfell as “a tragedy in three acts: a community ignored and abused; the trauma of that awful night; and the aftermath – being abandoned by the state”. He talks cautiously about justice. “Justice is a word that has a different meaning for each person,” he says. “Say half a dozen people go to prison and social policy changes for the better – will that bring us justice?” And: “Justice can’t bring back the people we lost, it can’t replace our community.”

Nevertheless, Daffarn is hoping for some specific outcomes in this week’s report. “One of the most important things is that Moore-Bick finds the building was non-compliant with regulations. If he does, then phase two can concentrate on which corporate bodies were responsible. If he doesn’t, phase two will be mired in uncertainty.

He also wants to see “clear exoneration” of Behailu Kebede, in whose fourth-floor flat the fire started and who was vilified in some media reports in the days after the inferno.

Daffarn expects the actions and decisions by the London Fire Brigade to be closely examined. “It’s really unhelpful that this issue is looked at through the prism of heroes and villains. We need to know about the management, policies, training and advice, and how all these things contributed.

“My life was saved by a brave firefighter. But at the same time there are many questions – the risk assessment of buildings, the radios that didn’t work, the ‘stay put’ policy [residents were told to stay in their flats and await rescue rather than escape the building]. When I came out of the building at 1.37am, there were numerous people shouting up to those inside, telling them to get out. That tells its own story.

It’s vitally important that we understand why the stay put policy was in place for as long as it was [the advice was abandoned two hours after the first 999 call], and why we weren’t evacuated sooner.”

He also wants to see the “behaviour and culture” of KCTMO, the company that managed the tower, scrutinised in the report. “We were up against an incredibly powerful and incredibly abusive non-functioning mini-mafia, and I hope and pray that by the end of the inquiry this is widely known.”

The visceral anger of survivors and bereaved relatives, which was vented in distressing and frustrating community meetings with officials in the aftermath of fire, has not dissipated, he says. “It’s still raw. The anger is valid and authentic but it needs to be channelled into bringing change.”

Daffarn was a mental health social worker until he took time out to care for his sick mother, and later his stepfather. Over the last couple of years, he has spent about 120 hours in police interviews, and now is devoting much of his time with his solicitor preparing to give evidence to phase two of the inquiry. He also has regular counselling.

He struggles to imagine a time when his life could move beyond Grenfell. “All of us [survivors] are on different paths. Some went back to work really quickly. For me, it’s like I’m on a train journey and though there have been plenty of times I want to get off, I have to follow through to the end

We’re determined not to be remembered for the way we were treated before the fire, but for the changes we bring. Our next fight will be to ensure the report’s recommendations are implemented and not swept under the carpet. We’re already steeling ourselves for the next part of this battle.”

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 27/10/2019 23:40

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/10/27/grenfell-survivors-told-sign-ndas-ahead-reports-release/

Grenfell families are to be required to sign non disclosure agreements before viewing a long-awaited report in to the fire which killed 72 people, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

The bereaved and survivors of the tragedy will tomorrow meet Sir Martin Moore-Bick, chairman of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, for a private briefing where they will receive an embargoed copy of the report covering the probe's first phase, ahead of its publication on Wednesday.

The document, which was due to be published at Easter but has been dogged by delays, will include a detailed description of the events of the night of the June 2017 fire as well as its origins and the response of the London Fire Brigade (LFB).

It is expected to heavily criticise the LFB for a number of failings, namely for telling residents to "stay put" for almost two hours as the west London tower block went up in flames

The 'core participants' - the bereaved, survivors and residents - have been invited to meet Sir Martin in a private meeting where he will outline the inquiry's approach to the report and its recommendations, before they collect their copies tomorrow afternoon

The inquiry has said previously that the chairman "believes that it is very important that those most affected by the fire have the opportunity to consider the key findings" before its publication.

The revelation that the families will have to sign a gagging agreement follows comments earlier this month from Doreen Lawrence, the mother of Stephen Lawrence and Labour Life Peer, who told Channel 4 News that she is concerned that the bereaved are not having their voices heard.

Moyra Samuels, part of the Justice for Grenfell campaign group, said that "you never know" if families would be prosecuted for discussing the report before it was released on Wednesday.

Ms Samuels, said: "They can't discuss the contents of the report with the media. I can't see how they're going to prosecute them but you never know. I think they're meant to all sign a non-disclosure agreement.

"I think they'll be expected to because the way that it is going to go is [Sir Martin] Moore-Bick is going to go through key headlines within the report and then as they leave they have to sign the non-disclosure and they'll be given the physical copy.

The report is expected to criticise the LFB for telling residents to "stay put" for nearly two hours after the fire began despite Dr Barbara Lane, a leading fire engineer, telling the inquiry that the policy had "substantially failed" by 1.26am - 32 minutes after the first call to firefighters.

Residents could have escaped during the preceding half an hour, but were told to remain in their flats. The policy was eventually abandoned at 2.47am.

The expected censure also follows extraordinary testimony from LFB Commissioner Dany Cotton last year in which she said she "would not change anything" the service did on the night of the tragedy and likened the event to "a space shuttle landing in front of the Shard" and "9/11".

The second phase of the Grenfell inquiry is expected to begin at the start of next year and will examine the refurbishment of the tower in flammable cladding. Any criminal charges are unlikely until at least 2021.

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry said: "The Report is being provided under embargo tomorrow to all core participants in line with Rule 17 of the Inquiry Rules 2006.

All core participants ... will need to sign an NDA, as the report will not be made public until Wednesday.

OP posts:
Jux · 30/10/2019 22:41

I thought Dany Cotton's statement was so completely underwhelming, she should be made to fall on her sword ignobly just for using the phrase"...the worst thing ever." She sounded like an inarticulate teen.

There was a woman interviewed on the BBC News channel who said that by the time they discover who the people actually responsible are, they will have vanished into the Bahamas. I thought, yes just getting their youngest kids through Uni, off to their new lives in July....

The whole thing is shameful.

Jux · 30/10/2019 22:43

Sorry, I should have thanked you for keeping the threads going, this is my go-to place to keep up.

HelenaDove · 30/10/2019 23:26

Thanks Jux I agree with Moyra Samuels The whole inquiry is arse about face. What happened in the run up to the fire should have been Phase 1

OP posts:
Jux · 31/10/2019 01:07

Quite. It is very telling that it isn't/wasn't. They thought they'd concentrate on the little people first and hope that all the anger and grief will have been dispersed by the time they get to the important people - "aim your anger at the Firemen, they're stout fellows, who'll put up with any amount of shit thrown at them". That's my inner conspiracy theorist raising it's ugly head.

HelenaDove · 31/10/2019 02:05

Jux i completely agree. I also think the general hope idea was that the media and general public would get bored and fed up and move on by the time they got/get to the corporates But i think they underestimate some of us.

OP posts:
BoomBoomsCousin · 31/10/2019 04:57

I’m really grateful for your dedication in keeping these threads going too, Helena. It’s really helped keep it in my sight.

Jux · 31/10/2019 11:26

They certainly underestimated you! Star

HelenaDove · 03/11/2019 00:01

Jux Thanks BoomBoomsCousin Thanks

OP posts:
OP posts:
DGRossetti · 05/11/2019 12:22

Not sure why we needed this long thread when apparently it's the victims own fault for being stupid and doing what the Fire Brigade said

www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/jacob-reesmogg-sparks-fury-by-saying-grenfell-residents-should-have-used-common-sense-and-fled-tower-a4278606.html

Jacob Rees-Mogg is facing calls to apologise after saying it would have been “common sense” for Grenfell residents to ignore the fire brigade's advice to stay in the building.

The Commons leader faced a barrage of criticism for the remark, which was branded “insensitive” and “appalling”. His comment came as he discussed the findings of the public inquiry report into the 2017 blaze on LBC with host Nick Ferrari on Monday morning.

HelenaDove · 05/11/2019 22:37

HelenaDove Tue 05-Nov-19 22:33:04
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/05/anger-as-government-lists-grenfell-firm-approved-contractor

Anger as government lists Grenfell firm as approved contractor
Recladding contractor Rydon is officially recommended for building high-rise housing

The government has placed the builder that oversaw the disastrous refurbishment of Grenfell Tower on an official list of firms recommended to build high-rise housing, a move that has sparked fury among survivors.

Rydon was the main contractor on the recladding which spread the fatal blaze that claimed 72 lives in 2017. The decision less than three years later to name it as one of the firms on a new £30bn seven-year construction framework agreement has been attacked as “adding insult to injury” by the bereaved and survivors.

Rydon will face intense scrutiny in the second phase of the public inquiry into the disaster, which will begin in the new year after the first phase last week concluded that the £10m refurbishment of Grenfell broke building regulations

All the companies involved in the refurbishment are also understood to be part of the investigation by the Met police for potential criminal offences including manslaughter and corporate manslaughter. Rydon has been named as one of 12 firms on the framework agreement that helps public sector bodies find building companies. The firm more than doubled its post-tax profits in the year after the disaster to £16.6m.

“It is totally unacceptable that Rydon, one of the companies required to answer questions for its role in the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower, would be put on a government list that promotes it as a reputable contractor for other high-rise towers,” said a spokesperson for Grenfell United, the main group representing bereaved families and survivors.

Get Society Weekly: our newsletter for public service professionals
Read more
“It makes us question the government’s intention to learn the lessons of Grenfell. [The housing secretary] Robert Jenrick must suspend Rydon from this list and explain how the contractor under investigation for Grenfell ended up there.”

A government spokesperson said: “There is absolutely no guarantee of a company securing government contracts just because they are on a framework. Under existing EU rules, we are not legally allowed to preclude Rydon Construction from bidding for government contracts.”

If a company is charged with an offence they can be excluded from bidding for work, officials said

Rydon declined to comment on its selection, which was first reported by Construction News.

The move came as Jacob Rees-Mogg, the leader of the House of Commons, was forced to apologise for saying he would have evacuated the burning building as it was “the common sense thing to do”.

Survivors described his remarks as “extremely painful and insulting” and the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, said they were “crass” and “insensitive”. Dozens of people were trapped by smoke and flames and were repeatedly told to stay put by 999 call operators.

On Tuesday, Rees-Mogg said: “What I meant to say is that I would have also listened to the fire brigade’s advice to stay and wait at the time. However, with what we know now and with hindsight I wouldn’t and I don’t think anyone else would. I would hate to upset the people of Grenfell if I was unclear in my comments.”

Also on Tuesday, the London fire brigade commissioner, Dany Cotton, told the London assembly that she feared firefighters and commanders could not be trained to tackle cladding fires similar to Grenfell.

“I still have concerns that even though we have a far greater understanding of that [the spread of cladding fires], it would be very difficult to implement training to respond to some of these situations because it is still such an extraordinary event of such a big scale that we still have huge concerns about fires in those types of buildings.

Cotton was previously lambasted for claiming that preparing a training package for a Grenfell-style fire would have been like planning for the “space shuttle landing on the Shard [skyscraper]”. Asked why a 2016 London fire brigade (LFB) document detailing the risk of high-rise cladding fires had not been disseminated, she said: “I don’t know why.”

Cotton has resisted calls to quit in the wake of last week’s public inquiry report into the night of the disaster, which found the LFB’s failure to prepare and plan for a cladding fire and evacuation was “gravely inadequate” and a breach of national guidance. Sir Martin Moore-Bick, the chair of the Grenfell inquiry, said the LFB was guilty of an “institutional failure” to inform firefighters about the risks of cladding fires before the disaster and said “the LFB is an institution at risk of not learning the lessons of the Grenfell Tower fire”

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 07/11/2019 21:43

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/07/government-in-u-turn-over-approval-for-grenfell-tower-contractor-rydon

Government drops Grenfell contractor in sudden U-turn
Housing secretary backtracks on allowing Rydon to bid for public contracts after outcry

The government has told the main contractor for the Grenfell Tower refurbishment to stop bidding for public contracts, in an abrupt U-turn days after angering survivors by naming it on a list of recommended companies for high-rise housing.

The housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, said late on Wednesday that Rydon should no longer bid for projects until it was established what caused the fire on 14 June 2017, which claimed 72 lives.

The government had named the Sussex-based construction business on a list of 12 companies recommended to public bodies for works on high-rise residential buildings in the south of England, which some of the bereaved and survivors described as adding “insult to injury

The Cabinet Office said only companies convicted of an offence could be excluded from bidding for work, and EU procurement rules meant it could not legally preclude Rydon.

Jenrick effectively executed the U-turn when he responded on Twitter to a critical statement from Grenfell United, which represents the bereaved and survivors.

“I understand why survivors and bereaved do not want to see public contracts awarded to the main contractor for the Grenfell Tower refurb until we have the full results of the inquiry. The contractor should not bid for further work until we know the truth,” he said.

Rydon Maintenance Ltd, part of Rydon Group Ltd, was the main contractor on the £10m project completed in 2016, part of which involved cladding the tower in panels the public inquiry into the disaster concluded were the main cause of the fire spread. The inquiry also found the works breached building regulations.

Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more
The Metropolitan police are carrying out a complex criminal investigation into the construction, refurbishment and management of the tower and the emergency response, as well as investigating possible corporate manslaughter, individual gross negligence manslaughter and health and safety offences
Sandra Ruiz, whose 12-year old niece Jessica Urbano Ramirez died in the fire, welcomed Jenrick’s move. “Thank you! Remember be brave to make the change. Ethics before profits,” she tweeted.

Rydon reported a £16.6m post-tax profit in 2018, more than double the previous year, when the Grenfell disaster happened.

The mayor of London had earlier banned Rydon from participating in a similar framework agreement for housebuilders in the capital.

Rydon had qualified as one of 30 companies recommended for use by public bodies across the capital, but Sadiq Khan issued a mayoral direction ordering the company’s suspension until the public inquiry into the disaster “has reported on the extent to which any Rydon group companies or employee contributed to causing or exacerbating the Grenfell Tower fire”. This is not expected until at least late 2021.

Rydon declined to comment, but Jenrick’s insistence the company does not bid for public works could have a serious effect on its business. It told the public inquiry into the disaster last year that “much of Rydon’s work is ultimately for public sector clients such as local authorities”.

Rydon has a public sector framework agreement, which means it is on a list of suppliers that have been evaluated as capable of delivering common public sector requirements using standardised contract terms. They are used by buyers in central government across the public and third sectors. Rydon’s recent workload has included projects for the NHS, housing associations and the Ministry of Defence.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “Being on a framework does not guarantee a company will secure government contracts and does not constitute an endorsement of them. Under existing EU rules, we are not legally allowed to preclude Rydon Construction from bidding for government contracts.

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 08/11/2019 16:50

ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/the-grenfell-tower-fire-as-a-breach-of-the-right-to-life/

The Grenfell Tower Fire as a Breach of the Right to Life
Daniela Nadj - 6th November 2019 OXHRH
Access to Justice
"Considered one of the worst man-made disasters in post-World War II Britain, the Grenfell Tower fire of June 14th, 2017 is a breach of the right to life, an assault on human dignity and a manifestation of stark inequality in the UK. The fire was a foreseeable consequence of collective political inaction to regulate health and safety in tower blocks. It was also the result of decades of deregulation in the housing sector.

The fire started in a faulty fridge freezer on the 4th floor of the 24storey, 120-flat residential block in West London, rapidly spreading throughout most of the building and engulfing the outside cladding within 45 minutes. 72 people lost their lives, 70 were injured, and 223 people escaped the building. Most of the residents were working class and of BAME background.

The fire speaks to the failure of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, one of the wealthiest boroughs in the country, to adequately regulate social housing. In April 1996 it had sub-contracted the management of its entire social housing stock to a private entity, the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (‘KCTMO’). Yet neither deemed it necessary to provide adequate health and safety regulations, such as sprinklers, and working fire alarms, which could have saved lives on the night, as stated in the recent Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report. And most significantly the Council signed off on a refurbishment contract with the contractor Rydon, which wrapped the tower in highly flammable ACM cladding in a drive to save cost.

The lack of health and safety regulation is therefore a clear a failure on the part of the state to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (‘ECHR’) 1950. The Human Rights Act 1998 requires public authorities to act in a manner that is compatible with the ‘Convention rights’ set out in section 1. (HRA 1998, s 6) It also requires domestic courts to interpret legislation so far as possible in a manner that is compliant with the ECHR, and empowers courts to award damages where Convention rights have been violated. The ECHR must be interpreted ‘in the light of its object and purpose’. Central to this is the doctrine of ‘effectiveness’, which requires courts to give the fullest weight and effect to the underlying purpose of protecting human rights. The justification for the doctrine of effectiveness is that member states cannot protect Convention rights simply by inactivity but under certain circumstances are required to undertake positive actions to protect rights, even if this requires expenditure.

Article 2 therefore includes a positive substantive obligation on states to take appropriate steps to safeguard the lives of those within their jurisdiction. Where a violation of the substantive positive obligation – namely, the state being obliged to institute and maintain an ‘effective system of deterrence’ against the threat to life in Article 2 – is established, compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage are in principle possible as part of the range of redress available. It is therefore possible, that the Council could be made liable in judicial review proceedings for its systemic regulatory failures, as the residents only discovered, post-Grenfell, that their homes were unsafe. This could form an ongoing violation of Article 2 of the ECHR, even in a domestic court of law.

On the 14th of every month, the community around Grenfell gathers to remember those whose lives were lost on the night of the fire. Walking in silence has taken on a symbolic power; it is an expression of quiet defiance in the face of a tremendous amount of injustice and institutional indifference. The residents who have formed the umbrella group Grenfell United, have vowed not to give up their fight for justice until they get it. Such justice must encompass potential lawsuits under the Human Rights Act 1998, as well as criminal charges against those entities who manufactured the ACM cladding and were instrumental in the refurbishment of the tower"

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 15/11/2019 21:47

tribunemag.co.uk/2019/11/debunking-the-grenfell-lies

Debunking the Grenfell Lies
By
Emma Dent Coad
This week Liberal Democrat Sam Gyimah claimed that Labour MP Emma Dent Coad was partly responsible for the Grenfell tragedy - here, she debunks his allegation and calls on him to apologise for the smear.

wo days after the Grenfell Tower fire an article appeared in London’s Evening Standard in which the former Conservative MP for Kensington accused me of ‘collective responsibility’ for the fire. This was exactly a week after I had won the Kensington constituency, overturning a Tory majority of 7,000 by just 20 votes.

I witnessed the fire, at the end of my road, in which several friends had been able to escape – and others had not. Some of them had been active in the residents’ group which had predicted the fire in November 2016, and then for their trouble had been sent a cease and desist letter from the Council for “scaremongering.”

The fire was utterly shocking and unbearably sad. The accusation levelled against me was inexcusable. I had countless death threats and had to ask the police for protection. My house was under police surveillance. I have asked three times for the former Tory MP Victoria Borwick to apologise and admit she had spoken in error. To date, she has refused

After Jacob Rees-Mogg’s appalling comments at the start of this election that the victims of the fire lacked ‘common sense,’ I didn’t think it could get worse. But I was wrong. Grenfell has become a political football. In recent days the Liberal Democrat candidate Sam Gyimah has repeated the accusation that I was somehow involved, but embellished it by saying that I “was part of all the discussions that went on in terms of the cladding.”

This is quite simply a lie. Where Gyimah got his information from I have no idea, but when misinformation brings death threats, and the perpetrator refuses to correct the error or apologise, and others don’t bother to verify and repeat it, the lie spreads like a virus.

So, here are some checkable facts which I hope will end this libel. I joined the Board of the Tenant Management Organisation (TMO) in June 2008 and left in October 2012. (Here is a link to the Board of Directors, also showing which Councillors were on it and when. Council Leader Cllr. Elizabeth Campbell was on the Board at the same time as me.

During my tenure there had been numerous complaints from residents about the condition of Grenfell Tower: broken lifts, draughty windows, poor insulation, and the heating and hot water system regularly breaking down.

In October 2012 (around the time I left the TMO) the then-Cabinet member Cllr. Tim Coleridge announced that a major refurbishment would be undertaken. Residents were pleased. At the time, the proposed contractor was with Leadbitter. The scope of the work was agreed at the time, but the detail was to come.

In April 2013 responsibility for the project was handed over to the new Cabinet member, Cllr. Rock Feilding-Mellen. It was not until January 2014 that the planning application was agreed (search for Grenfell Tower at this link)
n April 2014 it was announced by the Council and TMO that, due to costs, the contract had been awarded to Rydon rather than Leadbitter, who had scoped the work. Note that this was after the planning application was granted approval.

Throughout the summer amendments were made and detailed specifications decided. Cladding materials were proposed on 1 July, 2014. There were several amendments during this period. Often the details of these are done by ‘delegated decision’, which means the final details and choice of materials is decided by officers and not the Planning Committee.

Then on 30 September 2014 ‘Condition 3’ was agreed by delegated decision; this related to the final choice of cladding.

Who made those decisions, advised by whom, and why, should be thoroughly scrutinised by the agencies tasked with the job of investigating these matters and allocating accountability, responsibility, blame and – we hope ultimately – guilt.

To be clear, I was on the Board when the principle of refurbishing Grenfell Tower was discussed, but I was nowhere near the decision-making process for the detailed specifications for refurbishing Grenfell which started when I left. Board members agreed the contract but do not specify cladding or indeed any other technical details. Neither should they.

As you can see clearly from the dates when decisions were made above, the accusation made by the Liberal Democrat candidate Sam Gyimah is incorrect. He has been asked to apologise for his mistake. At the time of writing he has not.

I have signed up for the ‘Compassion in Politics’ campaign, which among other things hopes to: avoid language or behaviour that encourages hate or disrespect; speak with truth and integrity; uphold a level of respect and professionalism. I have huge respect for those who set up this campaign. Some of those who have signed should have a long, hard think.

I met Gyimah for the first time at a hustings recently, and offered a quiet chat afterwards on whether he wished to withdraw his comments. He didn’t take up the offer. I have no wish to spend time, money and stress taking legal action against someone who is clearly misinformed, but if I must, I will.

If this politically motivated lie continues to spread some people will believe it. My life could be in danger. He will be responsible for that.

Politics has always been argumentative and bitter at times. It has now become deadly. For the record, I will never respond in kind. Kindness – and compassion – are also contagious"

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 15/11/2019 23:20

www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/grenfell-contractor-wins-100m-contract-to-redevelop-london-estate-64125

Grenfell contractor wins £100m contract to redevelop London estate

NEWS
12/11/19
1:10 PM
BY JAMES WILMORE

A London council has officially announced the selection of Rydon for a £100m estate regeneration scheme, days after the secretary of state said it should no longer bid for public works

Ealing Council has officially awarded a £100m contract to redevelop the 264-home High Lane estate to Grenfell contractor Rydon #ukhousing
Twitter IHRydon has fought off two other bids to win a £99m contract with Ealing Council to regenerate the High Lane estate in Hanwell #ukhousing
Ealing Council has officially awarded the East Sussex-based firm the contract to demolish its 264-home High Lane estate, in Hanwell, and build 450 new homes of mixed tenure.

Rydon, which was the principal contractor for the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower, has been the preferred developer on the project since April 2017.

The contractor fought off two other bids to win the £99m contract as development partner, according to an Official Journal of the European Union notice.

The principal development agreement was signed officially on 8 October. The three-phase scheme, which has been backed by 90% of residents in a ballot, is expected to complete in 2027

Rydon is a major contractor in the social housing sector for construction, repairs and refurbishment projects.

Last week it emerged that it had been included on a government framework to work on high-rise residential buildings in the South of England.

However, after a backlash from survivors of the Grenfell fire, housing secretary Robert Jenrick advised the contractor not to bid for public work until investigations into the fire had been completed.

It also emerged that London mayor Sadiq Khan had signed an order last year saying it was not in the public interest to let Rydon bid for works until the Grenfell Inquiry had reported on “the extent to which any Rydon group companies or employee contributed to causing or exacerbating the Grenfell Tower fire”.

In a statement to Inside Housing, Ealing Council said: “We selected Rydon as a partner for this project in April 2017. This was after a three-stage competitive dialogue EU procurement process that shortlisted to five and then three companies. We then signed a principal development agreement with Rydon in October 2019.”

It added: “The eventual plans for High Lane will meet all current fire safety standards and there can be no comparison made with the construction methods or materials at Grenfell Tower. Residents have been fully aware throughout the process that Rydon is the developer on the project.”

However it added that the agreement “grants us the right to step in if for any reason they cannot fulfil their contractual obligations on the project”.

Rydon declined to comment on the contract award.

Last week Sir Martin Moore-Bick, chair of the Grenfell Inquiry, deemed the aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding installed on the outside of the tower the “primary cause” of the vertical spread of the flames and said that it failed to comply with building regulations.

Rydon was tasked with the refurbishment of the tower, which included new windows, a new communal heating system and the cladding. It sub-contracted the installation of the cladding to Harley Facades and the panels were provided by multinational materials company Arconic.

The first phase of the inquiry looked mainly into the events on the night of the fire. Phase two will look more at the lead-up to the fire, including the refurbishment.

Among the conclusions of the first phase was that the ACM cladding fitted during the refurbishment of the 24-storey block was the “primary cause of fire spread” and did not comply with building regulations.

Rydon is also working on a £155m joint venture contract with A2Dominion on regenerating Ealing’s Green Man Lane estate

Ealing Council’s full response
“Since 2013, the council has been working with residents of the High Lane estate to consider how we could make it a better place to live.

“Residents confirmed that they want the estate to be comprehensively redeveloped, which was confirmed in an independent ballot last December with 90% of eligible voters backing plans to rebuild their neighbourhood.

“We selected Rydon as a partner for this project in April 2017. This was after a three-stage competitive dialogue EU procurement process that shortlisted to five and then three companies. We then signed a principal development agreement with Rydon on 8 October 2019.

“The agreement grants us the right to step in if for any reason they cannot fulfil their contractual obligations on the project.

“Since 2017 Rydon have been working with the council and High Lane residents to produce a design for the new estate, in order to build the safe, modern homes that our tenants want. The design process was put on hold while we balloted residents. It is starting up again now with a new round of design workshops.

“All designs are being fully consulted on with residents. The eventual plans for High Lane will meet all current fire safety standards and there can be no comparison made with the construction methods or materials at Grenfell Tower. Residents have been fully aware throughout the process that Rydon is the developer on the project.

“The estate will be redeveloped in three phases between 2021 and 2027. Once completed it will offer 217 new genuinely affordable housing options for local people."

OP posts:
user1497207191 · 17/11/2019 08:48

It's actually really disturbing that HAs and public service contractors are currently exempt from FOI Act.

A cynical person may think that's exactly why local authorities etc have farmed out such activities, i.e. to avoid transparency.

HelenaDove · 18/11/2019 19:19

I totally agree.

OP posts:
HeIenaDove · 21/11/2019 21:26

.

HeIenaDove · 22/11/2019 02:41

www.insidehousing.co.uk/home/home/more-than-100000-medium-rise-buildings-outside-scope-of-fire-safety-measures-minutes-reveal-64231?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

More than 100,000 medium-rise buildings outside scope of fire safety measures, minutes reveal

NEWS
22/11/19
BY PETER APPS

There are more than 100,000 medium-rise homes that fall outside new regulations aimed at making buildings safe in the aftermath of Grenfell, including the ban on combustible cladding, Inside Housing can reveal.

More than 100,000 medium-rise buildings outside scope of fire safety measures, minutes reveal

NEWS
22/11/19
BY PETER APPS

There are more than 100,000 medium-rise homes that fall outside new regulations aimed at making buildings safe in the aftermath of Grenfell, including the ban on combustible cladding, Inside Housing can reveal.

Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
eCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines
Twitter IHThere are more than 100,000 medium-rise homes which fall outside new regulations aimed making buildings safe in the aftermath of Grenfell, including the ban on combustible cladding #ukhousing
Twitter IHLeaked minutes from a meeting between councils and the government show that lowering the high-rise threshold to 11m would increase scope to 100,000 buildings #ukhousing
Leaked minutes from a meeting between local authority figures and government officials have shown that lowering the official threshold for a ‘high-rise building’ to 11m would raise the current number of buildings in scope from 12,000 to more than 100,000.

These buildings, which can be up to seven storeys tall, sit outside requirements to remove dangerous cladding, as well as newer recommendations to provide fire alarms and write evacuation strategies.

The ban on the use of combustible materials also only applies from 18m – meaning new buildings can currently be built with combustible cladding in compliance with government guidance.

The Cube in Bolton, which was ravaged by fire ripping through combustible high-pressure laminate panels last weekend, measured 17.86m, meaning it slipped narrowly below this threshold.

A huge fire that tore through combustible timber cladding in Barking, east London, in June also occurred in a building below 18m.

Industry sources said that builders have deliberately designed projects to narrowly below 18m to circumvent the regulatory requirements that kick in above that threshold.

Scotland recently changed regulations to reduce the threshold to 11m. Sir Martin Moore-Bick, chair of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, said last month that he would consider recommending such a change in phase two of the inquiry.

It comes as Inside Housing updates its End Our Cladding Scandal campaign ahead of the general election. The campaign calls for a national taskforce to prioritise the building safety work required after Grenfell and a building safety fund that could be used for any tower with serious safety issues, regardless of height.

Funding is currently restricted to buildings with aluminium composite material cladding above 18m only.

The minutes obtained by Inside Housing record a meeting between representatives of London boroughs and government officials held in September.

“There are 12,000 existing buildings over 18m… should we lower the building height to 11m, the number will go up to over 100,000,” they read

Paul Bussey, CDM and fire lead at AHMM Architects and a member of the expert panel on fire safety at the Royal Institute of British Architects, said: “There are people who are gaming the system by limiting buildings to six storeys.

“We are pretty convinced [at RIBA] that the combustibles ban should come down to 11m, if not all buildings. Why put combustible cladding on any building?”

Jonathan O’Neill, managing director at the Fire Protection Association, said he had also heard about the practice of designing below 18m to avoid the ban.

He added that the system should be reformed to prioritise safety based on risk – such as the number of occupants and their vulnerability – rather than simply height.

If you take the Crewe care home fire [Beechmere Care Home], there were 120 elderly residents present. There is no way any height parameter would have applied to that building,” he said.

One other industry source said that if the threshold was not reduced, the effect of the post-Grenfell regulations would simply be “a new generation of buildings narrowly below 18m in height”.

Inside Housing’s End Our Cladding Scandal campaign, run in partnership with leaseholders of affected buildings, calls on the next government to take control of the cladding crisis at a national level.

It is supported by Grenfell United, the Fire Brigades Union, the National Housing Federation, the Chartered Institute of Housing and many others.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was unable to comment because of the election.

The Conservative Party did not respond to requests for comment.

Swipe left for the next trending thread