Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Xenia - I found an article which I thought you might find interesting!

91 replies

emkana · 07/01/2007 23:33

I think she has a point, not sure if you agree

OP posts:
expatinscotland · 08/01/2007 16:01

I never noticed others whilst I was doing it, though, except the instructors demonstrating.

I came to it from a ballet background, but it's all about your own body in yoga.

That's what's so terrific about it!

Judy1234 · 08/01/2007 16:04

Some places like Brighton have it but not authorised probably breaching rights actually if they use that word "bikram yoga". There are quite a few places in Central London but not out here near me.

uwila · 08/01/2007 16:04

What is this thread about?

Judy1234 · 08/01/2007 16:06

Ah.. not sure about that now. It's not clear who won a case in the US about the monopoly over it - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikram_Yoga

My daughter says it's a good way to make people pay for something, heat them up with heaters so they've got up a fake sweat and they go home thinking they've exercised... but she's wrong. You just have to look at the other people doing it regularly to see it works.

expatinscotland · 08/01/2007 16:09

I've found it better than Pilates, tbh. And I did Pilates for years before it was trendy.

It really does improve your joints and posture.

OrmIrian · 08/01/2007 16:25

What's different about bikram yoga? I did hatha yoga for years and really enjoyed it. is bikram the more high impact aerobic stuff?

expatinscotland · 08/01/2007 16:27

Bikram is a series of Hatha poses, but held for one minute the first time and half hte second, performed in an ashram that has been heated and humidified.

expatinscotland · 08/01/2007 16:28

It is not high impact at all.

OrmIrian · 08/01/2007 16:42

Ah! Thankyou. As opposed to being held in a portocabin classroom that has been neither heated (since the previous summer) or humidified since Bobby FirstYear wet himself

Caligula · 08/01/2007 16:48

I think what I didn't like about this article was her acceptance that you can only have a good, interesting engaging job if you are prepared to do it to the exclusion of then ther aspects of your life.

Both men and women would be better off and happier if workign hours were shorter and they could both function properly as parents, workers and partners all together in a proper balance. Nowhere does she challenge the idea that the rest of your life has of necessity to be fitted around your work, rather than vice versa.

Judy1234 · 08/01/2007 16:49

I can't find one near me, though, which makes it harder to go. I like the heat too.

Judy1234 · 08/01/2007 16:51

Cal, true. In fact long hours often mean incompetence and inefficiency.

Sitting as a non exe on boards (I do one) is actually ideal for those of us who like to do a variety of bits of work. I would like to do more of that but only when it's very well paid which it often isn't. I would like the Norwegian rule that 40% of boards must be female which is working well.

uwila · 08/01/2007 17:03

Is that 40% max.?

Judy1234 · 08/01/2007 17:07

No, it says all Norwegian boards must be 40% female or more. A lot of women who are well qualified but were over looked have got positions because men are thinking outside their usual preconceptions as to who has the right skills. Obviously it's positive discrimination and usually I'm against it but it seems to be working quite well and may be we could do with it here.

uwila · 08/01/2007 17:13

I know. Was just joking.

magicfarawaytree · 08/01/2007 18:00

excellent article.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page