I don't buy that she would still be trying to punish her ex after 2 years
Agree with DanaBarrett. 2 years is a SHORT time in many of these cases. The worst go on for 10 years, then the child is too old to be subject to court orders otherwise, I am sure they would go on for 20,30,40 - until one of the parents dies basically.
I am really not sure what some of you want. A Judge heard the evidence. From a variety of people. If she alleges he is a drug user and he's shaved his head - test his pubic hair or his leg hair. Do a mouth swab. Test his urine. Ask for police records, health records.
If someone is a drug user to the extent it impairs their parenting, I would be very very surprised if you can't prove it.
So that judge makes findings. Findings which stand as truth unless or until they are appealed. So you say - well, courts make mistakes. We will never know the whole truth.
Well, yes they do and probably we won't. But what is the alternative? That people are judged in the court of public opinion? The court of mumsnet?
For all its faults, I would far rather be judged by a court who heard the evidence from a variety of sources.