Geckos48
Again, this thread was supposed to be about the article I linked to (which I dont think most of the people commenting have actually read) and there is a big difference between the veterans of the WW's and those who have made a career out of being part of an armed forces that spreads terror and corruption around the world.
As I explained to you earlier, the veterans from WW1 were not the noble crusaders for freedom that you claim they were, even if they thought that was the case. WW1 was an Imperial war between two great Imperial powers. It was a war for control of territories and a war fought to control the balance of power. It was certainly a less noble cause than the Falklands, less noble than Bosnia, less noble than the first Gulf War in 1990 (which, you will fail to recall, was sanctioned by the UN).
That takes nothing from the sacrifice of those servicemen who fought in it. It is a simple fact, which is something you have failed to deal in at any point in this thread.