It's ridiculous and offensive - and dreary and lacking in imagination, and puerile and insulting and tasteless and gimmicky! Nul points Scotsman.
But nationalism - British, English or Scottish - I just can't see any point in it at all. You don't choose where you're born. Why should you be prouder of one part of the world than another?
When Scotland play rugby or football, I support them - sport is a game, so you support your home team.
But someone explain nationalism to me. What is it that you are proud of? Is it anything you have actually had a hand in shaping or working for? Is it something your parents or grandparents did? Is it the scenery, democracy (one vote every 4 years), all the Scottish inventors and writers and scientists and doctors? Is it a shared culture or set of values - if so, what is it that you have actually done yourself to produce this culture or uphold these values? And how are you so sure they are better than anyone else's culture or values?
Now, the French and the Egyptians, on the other hand, they had a revolution. They can be proud of that. But no matter how much you admire Keir Hardy or William Wallace, they are just individuals - they could have been born anywhere, and they would still have been outstanding.
All over the world brave people are fighting their governments. They can be proud of that. In other places people are working together for the common good. They can be proud of that. But we are just standing around whinging as our (UK) govt dumps on us from a huge height. I'm not proud of that.