Juggling - if you would like to rephrase that "I feel that wearing a poppy not only remembers those that have died in past conflicts, but encourages, in however small a way, other conflicts to continue" then you would be standing by your opinions. if you are not speaking for yourself, then I need some kind of citation for such a phenomenally crass statement. Sounds like a quack selling herbs "you may experience a feeling of wellbeing...". It either is what alot of people think, or it isn't.
If you are speaking for yourself, then I would not waste my time trying to persuade you otherwise.
LRD "I would imagine those of us who don't feel comfortable with poppies probably have done those things, AP. It's possible we're actually uncomfortable because we think more about these issues, not less".
and that would be the moral superiority .....
Those who we remember are not to blame for how their memory is twisted, used or otherwise taken out of context for the ends of others. When I wore a poppy as a 10 year old, I wore it for the same reason I wear it now, 30 years later. The social climate may have changed, my reasons for it have not. I will not jump onto the most recent bandwagon of opinion (in either direction), saying that they must be compulsory, or that it's distasteful to wear them when there are so many who died in the crossfire.
..and to paraphrase a far greater person, just because you're opting out of supporting those who died in those wars, doesn't mean you are opting in to support those who were on the other side/"collateral damage". Unless you actually spend concrete time and money and effort finding a good use for your pound, your minute's silence, your campaigning, then it is all just rhetoric.