Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

John Hemming and his love'rs cat

109 replies

NooNews · 27/09/2011 23:26

His mistresses kitten got stolen by his wife

Is this the same John Hemming who likes posting on MN?

OP posts:
JimmyS · 02/10/2011 21:44

"clearly you don't understand reductio ad absurdum."

Clearly one of us doesn't. Readers can decide for themselves which of us it is.

You still haven't addressed your double standard on privacy.

johnhemming · 02/10/2011 21:46

You still haven't addressed your double standard on privacy.
I wish you would spent the effort to understand what I say. I am, in fact, entirely consistent.

There is a difference between telling the truth and a right to know.

wannaBe · 02/10/2011 21:47

"wannaBe. I am sorry I am a bit of traditionalist." so how does that traditionalist mindset fit with having an extramarital affair for several years and fathering a child with your mistress while your wife is at home with your other four children? Hmm

Maryz · 02/10/2011 21:48

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JimmyS · 02/10/2011 21:50

I am trying to understand what you say but you continue to be evasive. I asked why you had an expectation of privacy when Mr. Tune and Mr. Giggs (apparently) do not.

LeBOF · 02/10/2011 21:52

Yes, there should really be just one rule for over-entitled sexual incontinents.

Riveninabingle · 02/10/2011 22:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

APWi · 02/10/2011 22:23

John Hemming's wife stated in court that he had been unfaithful "at least" 26 times (tinyurl.com/3pje7nc). Either she has lied again,this time under oath, or her statement is true. Unless it's yet another press inaccuracy that John Hemming "can't be bothered" to correct.

Talking of lies, I wonder if John Hemming's mistress - the one who, when her untruths were exposed on this very forum, fled for good and deleted her entire posting history - still lurks these boards?

Riveninabingle · 02/10/2011 22:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

wannaBe · 02/10/2011 22:32

jh's mistress was a poster here? how did I miss that!

RIZZ0 · 02/10/2011 22:38

JH you are deluded if you think that your personal life has no bearing on your ability to "serve constituents". We need politicians we can relate to and believe in, in terms of morals and values, and you are shamefully lacking.

The utter disrespect you have shown for the women (and children) in your personal life, and ensuing arrogant comments on this forum following the bonkers lengths you have clearly driven your "loved ones" to, beggar belief quite frankly.

nonentity · 02/10/2011 22:46

Grin APWi- of course Emily Cox still lurks (if not posts) - you can't actually leave MN once you've joined... just can't be done! Wink

JH will lose his seat next election if the boundary changes go through as proposed anyway.

hester · 02/10/2011 22:46

JH, you should be ashamed of yourself, coming on here to make a joke post on a thread about a very sad situation. Not very classy, and very disrespectful to the women you have hurt.

Having said which, I'd love it if someone could point me in the direction of JH's mistress's posts Grin

JimmyS · 02/10/2011 23:18

Both mistress and wife (or imposters who knows) appear to have resumed hostilities here:

www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/02/cat-theft-paris-fashion-immigration?commentpage=last#end-of-comments

TheHandThatRocksTheCradle · 02/10/2011 23:21

If the voters of Birmingham had any sense JH would lose his seat at the next election regardless of the boundary changes.

LeBOF · 02/10/2011 23:43

Hester, the posts have all been deleted. I mentioned the poster's name on another thread, thinking it was harmless as the posting history is gone, but my post was pulled.

BustersOfDoom · 03/10/2011 00:03

It shouldn't have been pulled as JH's OW outed herself on a thread about the kitten theft. She was taken to task by me and other MN's about the lies she had told about not being the OW and she apologised before leaving MN. She had always denied that she was the OW - when she was - whilst posting about all sorts of crazy things the 'ex' had done and getting lots of sympathy here.

johnhemming · 03/10/2011 04:54

"John Hemming's wife stated in court that he had been unfaithful "at least" 26 times (tinyurl.com/3pje7nc). Either she has lied again,this time under oath, or her statement is true. Unless it's yet another press inaccuracy that John Hemming "can't be bothered" to correct."

It is untrue. However, do people really want me to try to get her prosecuted for perjury?

scaevola · 03/10/2011 07:00

I would like to know how someone who stole and then abandoned a kitten is not responsible for what happened to the cat next.

If you know it to be dead - because domesticated kittens after all are not necessarily capable of hunting nor traffic-aware, nor dog proof, and it is an act of animal cruelty to abandoned - then I suppose natural cowardice might lead someone to refuse to comment.

If you know it to be alive, then you are continuing to be horrible to the child who owned it and it is petty, mean-spirited and cowardly not to own up to the circumstances.

But stealing a child's pet is so despicable that I am not surprised that the perpetrator was unable to either care adequately for the animal in the aftermath, or come clean about responsibility for its absence and likely death.

And I think being an apologist for such an action is shabby too. And yes, I do look for integrity in those who we choose to serve us as representatives.

scaevola · 03/10/2011 07:11

"It is untrue. However, do people really want me to try to get her prosecuted for perjury?"

Do you mean that it is untrue that she said this as part of sworn evidence, or that it is untrue because she had the number of people wrong?

If she lied under oath, then yes this should be reported for investigation. The police and Prosecutor's office would decide if there is a case to be heard, not the person making the complaint.

It is a cornerstone of our legal system that the oath to tell the truth is observed. Perjury is an immensely serious offence because it undermines a basic of the judicial system. It's another area where integrity is important.

johnhemming · 03/10/2011 07:18

Then firstly I have to get a transcript of the trial to make sure the reports of what she said were accurate.

I really don't personally wish to see her prosecuted for perjury.

scaevola · 03/10/2011 07:26

It wouldn't be up to you though, would it?

It's a criminal matter not a civil case. Anyone who witnessed it could report it.

MissBeehiving · 03/10/2011 07:35

So if it wasn't 26 poor deluded women, how many was it then? 25? Higher? Lower?

JimmyS · 03/10/2011 14:14

Apparently the line doing the rounds during conference season is "Liberals used to shoot your dog, now they'll steal your cat."

mathanxiety · 03/10/2011 20:56

Nominated yourself? you're right you didn't you phoned in support of your nomination..'I have voted for myself. At the end of the day you've got to laugh at something.'

That was a direct quote from a Sun article online so make of it what you will.

Next prize will be hairsplitter of the year.

Swipe left for the next trending thread