Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Dragons Dens James Caan tries to buy baby girl from family in flood struck village in Pakistan.

169 replies

TotorosOcarina · 22/10/2010 09:13

story here

This really shocked me.

Do you think you get to the point in being so rich you really think you can buy anything?

That family must have been devestated enough at loosing everything without someone trying to buy their daughter.

And £1,500? when he has £130million?

It was just horrible.

OP posts:
claig · 22/10/2010 11:22

Exactly, it is about his brother.

Appletrees · 22/10/2010 11:23

Yes Aitch I do think that complaining about it happening and then complaining about the price is very odd.

LIke the joke about a woman offered a million quid for sex, who agrees, then is offered 50p for sex, and says "what do you think I am" -- response, we've already established that, we're just negotiating over price.

If he's offered, he's offered. If he offered a million pounds you should still find it as reprehensible. Offering more does not ameliorate it.

Madonna and other celebrities have done exactly this. Exactly this. Without the pain of infertility. Have a go at them.

claig · 22/10/2010 11:23

He could have rescued the entire family for £150. But that wouldn't have helped his brother.

Appletrees · 22/10/2010 11:24

I think he and his brother will now be made "offers".

Awitch · 22/10/2010 11:25

am reluctant to return to the article but where are you getting this £150 from, claig? i thought it was £1500 he said.

Awitch · 22/10/2010 11:27

it is precisely the 'now we are just haggling' point, apples, i couldn't agree more. that was a peculiar point to make i thought.

claig · 22/10/2010 11:28

you said 10,000 rupees rescues an entire family. In the article it says

"Moments after taking the baby in his arms in a flood-hit village, he offers to buy the child for 100,000 rupees ? about £1,438 ? to give to his brother."

so £1500 = 100,000 rupees
so £150 = 10,000 rupees

so he could have saved the entire family (without the need to remove the newborn baby) for £150.

Appletrees · 22/10/2010 11:29

ten thousand rupees is about 150, actually about 135

claig · 22/10/2010 11:29

wasn't James haggling?

Appletrees · 22/10/2010 11:29

one lac is a vast amount of money in that region

Awitch · 22/10/2010 11:30

righto. i thought he had offered ten thousand rupees, i was making the point that no doubt that is what he thought he was doing for the rest of the family while also securing a 'better' future for the child with his brother.

Awitch · 22/10/2010 11:31

no, i don't think he was at all, claig. i think that's a cuntish thing to say actually, and demonstrates how far you are from even the reality that the daily mail has provided for you. i'm off.

claig · 22/10/2010 11:33

I think his offer was a "cuntish thing to say"

ColdComfortFarm · 22/10/2010 11:36

I am frankly sick of the super-rich (yes, that includes you, tax-dodging twat Bono) asking ordinary (aka much poorer) people for the kind of cash that they themselves wouldn't bother to fish out from down the back of the sofa. What is 500K to a man worth more than 100million (allegedly)? Why is he getting the glory and the TV deal when it's not even his money?

ColdComfortFarm · 22/10/2010 11:37

It's such a male thing, isn't it? JK Rowling just gives her money away and works quietly with charities.

PortoFangO · 22/10/2010 11:37

I'm starting to feel a bit sorry for the bloke now. Not often I am moved to pity by attractive multi-millionaires Grin

Awitch · 22/10/2010 11:42

yeah, some glory, putting himself up to be sneered at for not giving enough, and being followed by an itn crew is a pita and a major hostage to fortune, as this demonstrates.

ColdComfortFarm · 22/10/2010 11:44

Yeah, it went wrong, which was entirely his fault! Nobody made him start trying to buy babies for his family as if he was shopping for a bloody puppy. Of course a TV deal is glory. He loves publicity. Nobody does Dragon's Den for altruistic reasons, do they? As for giving 'his expertise', the arrogance of thinking you have more expertise in disaster relief than the major charities that do this day in and day out. He wants to help alright, providing other people pay for it.

PosieComeHereMyPreciousParker · 22/10/2010 11:45

Isn't he trying to raise awareness?

ColdComfortFarm · 22/10/2010 11:46

'being followed by an itn crew which is a pia' - are you stupid? Do you think the crew was there because they are stalking him? He's making a TV show!

ColdComfortFarm · 22/10/2010 11:46

Awareness of himself, primary, I would suggest.

Appletrees · 22/10/2010 11:47

Coldcomfort: yes it's for this reason that I am starting to shudder at Comic Relief, Children in Need.. etc. Celebs could just sit round back stage and work it out between them and save us all the newsreaders in spangles crap that we have to sit through.

claig · 22/10/2010 11:48

agree with ColdComfortFarm. There are loads of charities, possibly doing a lot more, but they don't attract the publicity that he can attract.

claig · 22/10/2010 11:50

I'm not a fan of Ricky Gervais. But have you seen his comedy sketches about Comic Relief when he was on there? I think he got close to the truth about some of it

Awitch · 22/10/2010 11:50

sorry, ccf, you're just wrong. he was filming an itn report about his charity.