"We've started telling friends in Merton that we're planning to move. One mum, says Pam, was welling-up."
Tears of joy, I suspect.
Does Andrew Penman actually think that what schools do between 9-4, 5 days a week for 39 weeks of the year has that much influence on how well their pupils do in national exams (which is the only aspect of education we're looking at here)?
Or does he think socio-economic deprivation means having to wait for the Boden sale?
I went to a secondary school with a bad reputation and poor academic record. However, if you wanted to work hard the staff would bend over backwards to help you. My timetable was even rejigged to let me take an extra exam in an additional subject.
Meanwhile, I received an excellent education in real life social skills and gained an awareness that not everyone was from a secure and supportive home like me.
How much academic pressure must his children be under, knowing their parents went through all this rigmarole? And where is the message that you are responsible for how your life turns out, not your parents? I'm actually totally shocked that he's so open with his children about lying and disrespecting someone else's religion to obtain what you want by underhand means?
And god forbid either of them want to leave at 16 and become sparkies or plumbers (and good on them I'd say, because that would show they really had thought about their future rather than just getting on the current higher education conveyor belt)...that would be a family discussion worth being a fly on the wall for! 