Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Zac Goldsmith and Ch 4 News

82 replies

WinkyWinkola · 16/07/2010 19:18

I watched a report last night about whether Zac Goldsmith among other M.P.s was guilty of overspending on his campaign.

I kind of dismissed it as a petty targetting of Mr. Goldsmith because of who he is.

But tonight on Ch. 4, I see him evading and dancing round the questions about his campaign funding levels, instead focusing on why he wasn't called for a live interview last night.

It was really embarrassing. Did anyone else see it?

Are all M.P.'s really the same? If so, why does anyone even bother to get excited about politics.

OP posts:
mrsruffallo · 17/07/2010 21:29

Well, I don't care about a few raincoats. It would be a trivial thing to have to stand down for. He may be an excellent MP, I don't think being born into a rich family makes him a bad person

merrymouse · 17/07/2010 21:30

And we will wake up and find that nobody wanted to be ruled over by a load of idiots from Eton and the Bollinger club (or whatever it was) after all and it was all a dream.

mrsruffallo · 17/07/2010 21:33

I don't know, I think the middle classes are jealous of people born into upper class families.
It's a strange thing really. They are held in as much contempt as the chavs
Would the world be a better place if we were all middle class?

claig · 17/07/2010 21:57

I am not a fan of Zac due to his green nonsense, so I was predisposed to believe that Channel 4 were onto something. But after I saw the interview I formed the impression that Zac was genuine and they had played tricks. Yes he was like a little boy, yes he was jabbing and pointing, but that was because he was genuine. He wanted them to retract what they had said the night before. He was fuming at what they had done. He was not a schmoozer and charmer, a two-faced polished politician who would sell his own grandmother, he was for real and that is why he was genuinely angry. Snow, for whom "it is rare to be entirely comfortable with" Channel 4 News's position, is a polished experienced performer so he pulled out all the old tricks, like waving his paper and trying to move it on and saying "why don't you take it to Ofcom?" and then he pulled the cheapest pre-prepared stunt of all when he said "where is the new politics?", to which Zac rightly replied "what about some new journalism?". I hope Zac does take it to Ofcom and after Channel 4 checks it out with the electoral commission, as Snow stated they had not yet done, then we may well see an apology from Snow on air. Of course that will be too late as the damge has already been done.

autodidact · 17/07/2010 22:03

There is nothing wrong with upper class people in politics at all as long as they know how the other half live, are aware that they are lucky and want to give something back to all sectors of society through public service. Absolutely nothing wrong with that at all and there is in fact a great British tradition of this occuring. Zac Goldsmith, however, is not of this ilk, imo. He is more of a power hungry, morally and intellectually lightweight type- quite typical of the conservatives of his generation, I suspect. Many of the current crop seem desperately short on deeply-held principles, imo. ZG obviously has a stupendously huge sense of entitlement, which is probably behind his sense that there is absolutely nothing wrong with throwing money at a problem to unfairly gain an advantage and his incredulity that anyone could genuinely wish to question his actions. He came across as an arch-dissembler and complete twatweevil on c4 news.

mrsruffallo · 17/07/2010 22:05

It's very hard to challenge the media as they are smooth operators and experts in confrontation.
They should be challenged, and more often imo as they wield so much power, even more than politicians at times

claig · 17/07/2010 22:15

agree with mrsruffalo, the media are more powerful than politicians. They can destroy politicians and wreck their image, as they did with Foot, Steele and Kinnock, and they can also build them up as they all did with Clegg, the Guardian included. The fact that a rich powerful person like Zac was trying to defend himself against their actions illustrates that.

llareggub · 17/07/2010 22:23

I had the impression that ZG is already tired of politics. Did anyone else wonder what he meant by "if I stand for election again" and suspect that he isn't in it for the long haul?

claig · 17/07/2010 22:27

I think he is more interested in his green stuff than other issues and day to day constituency problems, so I wouldn't be surprised if he pushes for a green agenda and then leaves.

grannieonabike · 17/07/2010 23:38

Well I didn't know he was into green issues - which I suppose would raise him a millimetre in my estimation.

Yes the media (even, maybe, lovely Jon Snow) are too powerful and often mislead. But that doesn't make Zac Goldenballs' behaviour angy better. He was terrier with his head down a fox hole. He would have done so much better to have simply answered the questions. Nasty.

claig · 17/07/2010 23:53

He's green alright, some of us would say between the ears,
www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1210961/David-Camerons-300m-signing-Can-Zac-Goldsmith-turn- Tories-green.html

that's why the comments of the wise readers of the Daily Mail, who are not susceptible to the wool being pulled over their eyes, are not favourable to him.

mrsdennisleary · 18/07/2010 00:02

Friend in his constituency has written to him 3 times on a constituency issue. First got lame respnse saying am still getting to grips with job, be in touch soon. Two follow up letters and nada from Zac. perhaps he is too busy stocktaking his excess election materials. Looks like reality of being mp duller than he realised.

SomeGuy · 18/07/2010 01:34

he looked pretty ridiculous whining on for 6.5 minutes about the interview request.

That said the argument about the jacket looked pretty silly - you don't throw away a jacket after an election, you keep it for the long-term, it's a capex, not a consumable.

not so sure about the unused posters, but I suspect the whole 'investigation' reflects C4 journos' politics, the easy location, and the news value of a Goldsmith

merrymouse · 18/07/2010 10:05

I don't think he is a bad person. I do think that he has yet to achieve anything without being propped up by rich relatives.

I am not sure how to define a 'chav' exactly. However, if that would be somebody who has led a narrow existence and is completely reliant on others for their living, that can fit somebody who went to public school as much as it can fit somebody living on a council estate.

mrsshackleton · 18/07/2010 21:54

I'm in ZG's constituency and met a few very angry neighbours who'd had ZG posters put up outside their zillion pound houses without being asked

My problem with ZG is he is out for himself and has zero understanding of what real people worry about. However all my friends fancy him and voted for him on that basis

chandellina · 18/07/2010 22:10

i defended him on the last thread here but I thought he came across very poorly on Ch. 4.

Jon Snow didn't impress me either, the two of them were just bickering about something of very little interest to viewers or voters.

But I had to agree with JS that it looked like ZG was just avoiding the questions, and being quite petty about the whole thing.

I was amazed JS didn't just cut the interview sooner, since ZG only in the last minutes said anything relevant.

yet I also agree though that this "investigation" looks to be much ado about nothing, and probably the sort of thing regularly found in any candidates' tally sheet.

greythorne · 18/07/2010 22:17

There's something weird about Zac Goldsmith.

Ok, he's very rich, very privileged, comes across as very arrogant, treats JS (very respected journo) like a little irritant to be put in his place. Has confessed to an affair with his brother's SIL. Not terribly good start.

But there's more.

How many people know that he is involved with the soy scaremonger crew in the US?

Very concerning.

daftpunk · 18/07/2010 22:36

mrsshackleton;

What do real people worry about?....do we all worry about the same things?

If you're talking about the problems of living on the breadline etc, (are only poor people allowed to have worries? are rich people not allowed to worry about anything?) I doubt there are many politicians who have experienced that (most politicians across all parties are from priviledged backgrounds)...and with regards to voting for Zac just because he's good looking...lol to that because the only reason Tony Blair got elected was because he was young & good looking...(not my type but ykwim)

And I'd bet my house that David Miliband will be next Labour leader....I wonder why?

ItsGrimUpNorth · 18/07/2010 22:47

God, not because he's good looking. Because he's not.

None of them are. They're all deeply unattractive because they all look so, well, they're politicians, aren't they?

Oh and worrying about the next meal or paying for a roof over one's head is probably far more significant and immediate a worry for many people.

I'm sure the rich have their worries.. .... ..especially non dom politicians. How on earth will they get that past the electorate?

claig · 18/07/2010 22:49

greythorne, I agree with him about soy, I think he is right there, but I don't agree with him about global warming etc. But good on him for bringing these issues up.

Wow he knows what he is on about, he is good on animal fats etc., he is against the prevailing trend.

greythorne · 18/07/2010 23:01

claig that's hilarious! I follow your posts with interest and I find myself (in the nicest possible way) disagreeing with you on everything.....I can't believe that we even disagree about something as non-political as soy!

Sorry to digress. I enjoy your posts but profoundly disagree with you.

claig · 18/07/2010 23:13

greythorne look into soy, it's more important than politics. It's to do with your health. I will dig out some stuff on soy that I posted before because it is important.

claig · 18/07/2010 23:23

Guardian article about soy
www.guardian.co.uk/news/2006/jul/25/food.foodanddrink

"Soya is used in traditional oriental diets in these forms, after cultures, moulds or precipitants have achieved a biochemical transformation, because in its raw form the mature bean is known not only for its oestrogenic qualities but for also its antinutrients, according to the clinical nutritionist Kaayla Daniel, author of The Whole Soy Story. Soya was originally grown in China as a green manure, for its ability to fix nitrogen in the soil, rather than as a food crop, until the Chinese discovered ways of fermenting it, she says.

The young green beans, now sold as a fashionable snack, edamame, are lower in oestrogens and antinutrients, though not free of them. But raw mature soya beans contain phytates that prevent mineral absorption and enzyme inhibitors that block the key enzymes we need to digest protein. They are also famous for inducing flatulence.

Christopher Dawson, who owns the Clearspring brand of organic soy sauces, agrees. He lived in Japan for 18 years and his Japanese wife, Setsuko, is a cookery teacher. "I never saw soy beans on the table in Japan - they're indigestible."

and here is a quote from another Guardian article
www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2004/nov/07/foodanddrink.features7

"US nutritionist Kaayla T Daniel who has studied the history of soya consumption dismisses the comparison, arguing that the soya eaten in China and Japan, such as tofu and miso, is very different from the industrially processed variety used in today's Western food. 'Claims that soya beans have been a major part of the Asian diet for more than 3,000 years, or from "time immemorial" are simply not true,' she said.

The soya bean originated in China, and according to Daniel the ancient Chinese called it 'the yellow jewel' but used it as 'green manure' to enrich the soil for growing other crops. She says soya did not become a staple human food until late in the Chou Dynasty in 1134 BC when the Chinese developed a fermentation process to turn the bean into a paste best know by its Japanese name miso. The liquid poured off during this production of miso is what is known as soya sauce. She claims that the traditional process of making fermented soya products like tofu or tempeh destroys many of the allegedly dangerous chemicals in soya, unlike modern factory methods used today."

It was from an interesting thread about aspartame, sucralose, diet drinks, soy, quorn etc.

MollieO · 18/07/2010 23:23

His father was an extremely unpleasant character and it appears that the apple hasn't fallen far from the tree. He is incredibly arrogant and was fairly and squarely caught out by C4.

daftpunk · 18/07/2010 23:28

Claig;

That's really interesting...thank you.