@5zeds
My objection is more that I think it wouldn’t work and would be expensive. All children are already registered at birth in the uk. They also have Drs and dentists and midwives and health visitors and benefits, why do we need to register their “education” separately and couldn’t we just use the data we DO have
The systems aren't very well joined up, so it would be hard to flag up that the child hasn't been seen by a doctor for years (maybe it's just in robust health) AND hasn't seen a dentist (maybe they went private - I don't think that's on a central register) AND doesn't go to school.
Schools are the backbone of safeguarding in this country - often the only place a child gets to see a professional on a regular basis who knows them, can spot changes, and who is sufficiently trusted that the child might say when things aren't right at home. They are often the ones to make social services referrals if necessary.
So, those children who aren't at school do need some level of regular professional oversight in lieu of what they'd normally get at school.
It's not just the data point that the child exists, it's more than that