@user1494050295 - I think people realise LSE is very competitive but, to be fair, it's the same situation at many other universities. How is it thst Oxford and Cambridge receive similar numbers of applicants, but still manage to administer admissions tests, read PS and references, contextualise GCSE / predicted A-levels, interview a large proportion of applicants and still give decisions to everyone, either way, within three months?
Some years ago now, one of mine applied for Geography, with 12 9s and four A star predictions and an A star EPQ. Applied in early October. Was rejected in May! How is it acceptable to sit on a young person's application for 8 MONTHS? This was for Geography, which only received about 200 applications anyway. How hard can it really be for that department?
As it was, LSE did her a favour because she reapplied and got into Cambridge the following year (which was preferable as she hadn't wanted to stay in London anyway as we live there).
LSE state that tailoring the PS to the specific LSE course is key to who is made an offer and who isn't. But this makes a mockery of the whole process really, when so many students have the PS written for them. Especially, international students who hire consultants to boost applications to overseas institutions.