Mine hadn’t applied to Oxbridge but the obsession about it on this site is beyond weird.
Mine hadn't applied to Oxbridge either, and my other DC is too young to have done so, but I get the obsession with Oxbridge on this site.
The enormous amount of prep and consideration + motivated, engaged, mostly middle class parents = a lot of analysis.
With all the extra tests you have to do as an Oxbridge applicant and the amount of transparency Oxbridge provide in providing results and the sheer number of colleges, there is a lot of data to obsess over.
The Oxbridge threads are a long MN tradition (I've been here since at least 2007 on and off) and they've always seemed great, if sometimes over very involved. I've admired the camaraderie and focus and am considering grooming DC2 to apply in a few years just to be on the threads
. (That's a joke, for the avoidance of doubt.)
So I get it that after going through all that, you are going to be very proud or upset and it's a greater adjustment than coming to terms with a no from a different university where you don't have to jump through extra hoops and prepare for it for a sustained period of time.
The obsession on this board I personally don't get - and I'm NOT talking about anyone on this thread! - is how some posters are about London universities, particularly LSE and Imperial, with not sometimes accepting that London isn't a good fit for many, including those who live in London and want to go elsewhere. It's an insistence that a few London unis are just as good as Oxbridge, but if those posters accept that Oxbridge isn't a good fit for people and isn't the be-all and end-all, then they have to accept the same is true for London. It then becomes very much about Oxbridge and London (or Oxbridge versus London) with not much consideration for the fact that other universities aren't second or third best in the scheme of things on an individual basis, because ultimately what is best is what suits the individual.
I say this partly because on a subject specific offers thread I'm on, someone came on and asked why no one had applied for LSE when it's the best, missing that at least two people had, and then extolling its virtues as a university when no one asked. If someone had done that for Oxford, they'd have rightly been given short shrift.
I feel for @MrsFloof and I hope she stays. I agree her comment on here about earning potential was crass and not suitable for here at this point in time, but looking at her other posts, she was extremely considerate and sweet to people who had Oxford rejections, and I don't really see her crowing about things on several threads.
I also feel for all the other Oxford unsuccessful applicants and even some of the successful ones, because whether the process is fair or not is being picked over and discussed.