Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
SusanAndBinkyRideForth · 18/03/2016 19:40

Parent and teacher here.
I'm not angry. Well, not anymore.

I'm despairing.

And she's not going to come back and read any of the comments anyway, so it's all fruitless :(

Duckdeamon · 18/03/2016 19:45

Yeah we all really want a "Parent Portal" Confused Had someone at DfE been reading the Harry Potter where Cedric wins the challenge and gets ported direct to Voldemort to his doom?

We want the "best for our children" through policies that make their teachers ill and leave in droves Confused

And we want "accountability" through giving away public assets to the private sector Confused

I often moan about MN guest posts, but this one takes the Biscuit

Classic examples of Orwellian doublespeak abound!

voddiekeepsmesane · 18/03/2016 19:47

As far as I can see at the number of secondary schools taking up academy status I can see a need to convert the 1/4 left that haven't and say every secondary should be an academy. BUT making smaller (sometimes tiny) primaries take on academy status by joining an academy chain ( only way they can become an academy) and therefore basically killing the small village primary schools is not fair or right IMO

Duckdeamon · 18/03/2016 19:47

And thanks for informing me that the world is "increasingly global" Grin

Libra · 18/03/2016 19:50

Thanks for the link to the petition. Have signed, for all the good it will do.

HalfwayUpALadder · 18/03/2016 19:52

OP ODFOD

OrangeNoodle · 18/03/2016 19:54

She won't have written it herself. Some two-bit PR person will have been briefed to write it in response to the general dissent on MN. This thread will be monitored by minions, guaranteed.

OrangeNoodle · 18/03/2016 19:56

Totally agree with you voddie about small village schools. Our has gone from being a well-loved well-run village school with a good, approachable head and a board of governors we all knew and trusted, most of whom live in the village, to being managed by a distant diocese led MAT, with an executive head who visited the school perhaps a handful of times in a year, no head teacher and no board of governors. It's tragic.

TiredMummyXYZ · 18/03/2016 19:57

Petition signed

Finola1step · 18/03/2016 20:00

Petition signed and shared.

Nicky Gove (as I now like to call her) hasn't got the gumption to look at these responses. Not one shred of support.

She may voice the words but they belong to Michael.

Niklepic · 18/03/2016 20:01

What about those with SEN? They haven't been mentioned at all. Just wondering how long it will be before I'm forced to withdraw DS and HE.

GingerIvy · 18/03/2016 20:02

Petition: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/124702

Grin
SugarPlumTree · 18/03/2016 20:03

There seem to be two petitions going on this I think ? Here and here but have a stinking headache (not helped by reading this) so might be wrong.

OrangeNoodle · 18/03/2016 20:06

Don't know about SEN Nikl. I assume it's bad news for those in mainstream as there will be no LA influence to enforce EHCPs are stuck to.

Who knows about special schools. I hope to god they are protected from this nonsense as DS is at a wonderful LA maintained special school.

glowfrog · 18/03/2016 20:07

Betty yes, it's turning out that this government is made up of fanatics who are managing to push ideology over all else but doing so without scruples at the same time. Astounding stuff.

Hama what you said!!

prettybird · 18/03/2016 20:08

I wonder if this thread will get pulled like the one that Jeremy rhyming slang Hunt tried to use to put forward the case for the change in Junior Doctors contracts and instead got torn to shreds Hmm

Love all the links to the petition! Smile

zen1 · 18/03/2016 20:08

Dear Nicky

You are talking bollocks. I would like you to explain how 'academisation' will allow my child with SEN to fulfil his potential. As I understand it, with their 'greater autonomy', academies can refuse to admit a child with additional needs on the basis of the fact that they can't meet the particular needs of the child. My child is in a main stream school with his siblings. I wanted him to go there. Until you changed the curriculum, his progress was evident. Yes, he was not at the same level as his peers, but with the old curriculum, his progress was measurable. Now, with the abolition of the easy to understand levels and sub levels of the old curriculum, he is stuck in education nomansland. Teachers don't know how to assess him using the new curriculum, and have put him back on P-scales as they are the only measures they seem to understand. So, to clarify, this time last year he was coming off P-scales and on the level 1 of the NC. Now, because of the raised expectations, he is nowhere near where he should be, so has been moved BACKWARDS. In what way is he being able to fulfil his potential?

I fear all children with SEN are viewed by your Party as the educational underclass (still, I shouldn't be surprised, given your stance on people with disabilities). I'm sure exceptional education would transform children's futures. But what your Party is proposing is not exceptional education. It's a bloody cop out.

GingerIvy · 18/03/2016 20:08

It says ALL schools, doesn't it? Surely that includes special schools. I note they're careful to avoid mentioning that.

OrangeNoodle · 18/03/2016 20:11

The white paper didn't mention special schools, just mainstream. Basically they haven't got a clue what to do Hmm

Duckdeamon · 18/03/2016 20:12

Was this stuff in the manifesto? Under a year ago. Doubt it somehow.

A previous thread got pulled? How come? Not impressed if MNHQ pull threads just because users express their ire and political parties dislike it!

leccybill · 18/03/2016 20:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 18/03/2016 20:14

Was this stuff in the manifesto? Under a year ago. Doubt it somehow

I think it was. It's certainly not a surprise to those involved in Education at a Strategic Level. I was at a briefing last summer where it was openly being referred to as a government target for this parliament.

MuddhaOfSuburbia · 18/03/2016 20:14

thing is- I don't think they give any sort of shit WHAT we think

I'm pretty long in the tooth but I've never felt so helpless

it's like yelling into a void Sad

JWIM · 18/03/2016 20:15

I would support R4 More or Less crawling over every statistic and number in the White Paper - which I am steadily and despondently reading.

Currently the DfE can force failing schools to convert to academy status - so no need for change there.
Currently any good/outstanding LA school can decide to convert either alone or to a multi academy trust - so nothing to stop that happening now.
So what is the real reason for putting any Government funding (albeit probably less than 50% of the likely cost) in place in an already over stretched national budget to force all non academy LA schools to convert?

There is a lot about removing the Geographic limits that the LA structure created. I haven't found it yet, but there has to be some feature of this proposal that says you can have an MAT of good/outstanding schools but you must have a proportion of RI/Special Measures schools too - and they can/must be in one of the areas where education provision is deemed 'wanting'. The White Paper has a map. Because the successful expertise in the good/outstanding schools should/can/must be shared and the fact that most of the schools in the MAT are in say Hampshire and the ones assigned needing support are in say 'a bit of the country 200+ miles away' is not a problem - those successful/able staff will travel.

I very much hope this proposal falls at an early hurdle to save the waste of time and money, not to mention anxiety and stress on all those involved in education. It was not in the conservative manifesto. It could be the current Govrenment's 'poll tax'. But what a way to waste time and money.

If it goes ahead -
I know teachers will still do their best, if they stay;
my children will have emerged from formal education so not an immediate concern for me;
but the Year R children I saw today - what did they do to be the subject of an ill thought out experiment which, to use Nicky Morgan's own words
"Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education"
and if she is wrong there is no second chance.

Duckdeamon · 18/03/2016 20:15

Where is the evidence that schools being owned and managed in this way improves academic and social outcomes for pupils, parent and staff satisfaction?

How will ECHPs work?

Anyway, "Academisation" is not a proper word.bFollow your own gov.uk plain English guidelines!