Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
JWIM · 21/03/2016 10:11

PrettyBrightFireflies I give you the response to this thread as an indication of the likely response to imposed, unproven, all school conversion to Academies.

Why are you questioning whether there might be sufficient LAs to take on the role but seem content that 'because change is needed' not questioning the capacity for independent organisations (from whatever source) to come forward? Surely there are already areas in the country that are ripe for the likes of Oasis/Harris/ANO Academy Trust to expand into? Why hasn't this happened?

Whilst there may be some local political resistance to the LA proposal I suggested, at least there I have proposed a tried/tested educational provider that is generally successful, no matter the Government/policy climate. And, let's face it, the local population will have no oversight of the new Academies (sorry, I am not going to take up the short hand 'academisation') and they (Academy schools) no real accountability to that local population.

Apologies for breaking the new SPaG rules with the choice of 'And' to start a sentence - how about a ! at the end for good measure!

JWIM · 21/03/2016 10:17

PrettyBrightFireflies
I do just want to commend you, genuinely, on prompting this debate as an almost (haven't been back to check) lone voice in seeing some merit in the proposal - if only to address the need to improve the education chances of some of our children.

It is helping to formulate coherent responses to the Guest Post and might give Nicky Morgan/DfE a starting point when responding to MNHQ's request that they return to the thread.

I also have every sympathy for the gut reactions of many - it is their children's education at stake.

DramaQueenofHighCs · 21/03/2016 10:44

Pretty maybe I am confusing your posts with others, and if so I apologise.
However I still stand by my saying that you 'train' school staff but (I assume, please correct me if I'm wrong) you don't work closely in a school with students and teachers. To be fair, that gives you no more or less right to an opinion than the rest of us though and, like JWIM I am glad of your posts as they provide articulate debate rather than all the responses being one sided. I actually wish there was more than you 'taking your stance/side' (for want of a better phrase) as it almost seems like we are attacking YOU when I know (for me personally at least, though I'm bad at phrasing things, but I'm sure it goes for all others here too,) that we are 'deconstructing your statements' instead.

FWIW (and I hope I don't sound patronising, it isn't meant, but as I said I'm bad at phrasing) I admire you for sticking to your guns and beibg articulate. When you are asked for 'evidence' you are finding it where you can and where you can't you are admitting you can't - which is far more than the government seem to be doing!!
Also I don't seem to be as worried about 'unqualified teachers teaching my child' as many people seem to be - simply because I've known many fantastic unqualified teachers and many rubbish qualified ones. Are all parents who home ed their kids 'qualified teachers'? (Yes I know they know their kids etc, but I'm just saying how the word 'qualified' doesn't always mean much!) However I do think there should be some perks avaliable right from the start for those who have put in the effort to qualify, but also in the same way there should be readily perks for unqualified teachers that prove themselves excellent at teaching that can be measured and controlled to make sure they get those perks and promotions! (And that the sub-par qualified teachers don't get them just because they are "qualified" - but Lo, that is a whole new and complicated discussion topic!)

DramaQueenofHighCs · 21/03/2016 10:47

Apologies for the myriad errors in my previous post! Damn iPhones and me forgetting that there is a 'preview' button so I can read my posts through before posting!

noblegiraffe · 21/03/2016 10:53

pretty you appear to be saying 'something must be done about failing schools, this is something, therefore it must be done'

But it's a pretty blunt instrument, and is unevidenced, therefore caution should be advised rather than irreversible changes.

prettybird · 21/03/2016 11:02

Good news is that both petitions are now over 100,000 and still rising Smile

However, you should still contact your MPs: under EVEL, I don't think the Scottish, Welsh or Northern Irish MPs will be allowed to vote as Education is devolved. So you need to make those Tory MPs with a conscience if there are any Wink or narrow majorities to think twice about these changes.

TwoLeftSocks · 21/03/2016 11:08

So pleased the petitions have done so well! Have written to my MP (Labour).

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 11:08

This suggests you’re a gambler rather than a strategist. Unfortunately you’re gambling with the future of every state educated child in the country.

Goodness, no - defeatist, maybe; because I'm of the opinion that it won't be changed, so would rather put my efforts into making the best i can of it. I agree that politicians are gamblers; but some would say that risks have to be taken to succeed.

I'm not oblivious to the fact that they are gambling with DCs education - I have DCs in the system. however, that's certainly not unique to this government. All Governments of all ideologies gamble with the public services they deliver. I was accused of being a troll when I posted that the education of our DCs is political - but that is what this comes down to, governments being able to implement change in line with their own ideology.

I'd be the last person to help formulate political strategy - I operate within the boundaries that are set nationally, I've no interest in setting them myself!

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 11:16

JWIM I did question the capacity of Sponsors to accommodate this plan - The current workload of Regional Schools Advisors is, as I understand it, almost exclusively seeking new Sponsors to run existing, failing, academies.

Yes, this thread, and the petitions are evidence of the national strength of feeling. Broken down, a few hundred people in each LA have signed the petition. Those voices could be a very strong force when it comes to local council elections - but it would be necessary for people to vote tactically, based on the local position, and not just knee-jerk in response to national policies.

biddy53 · 21/03/2016 11:39

From Michael Wilshaw's letter to Nicky Morgan dated March 2016

"Despite having operated for a number of years, many of the trusts manifested the same weaknesses as the worst performing local authorities and offered the same excuses. Indeed, one chief executive blamed parents for pupils’ poor attendance affecting pupils’ performance. There has been much criticism in the past of local authorities failing to take swift action with struggling schools. Given the impetus of the academies programme to bring about rapid improvement, it is of great concern that we are not seeing this in these seven MATs and that, in some cases, we have even seen decline.

Across the seven MATs, inspectors found many of the following concerns:

 poor progress and attainment, particularly at Key Stage 4
 leaders not doing enough to improve attendance or behaviour
 inflated views of the quality of teaching and insufficient scrutiny of the
impact of teaching on pupils’ progress
 a lack of strategic oversight by the trust of all academies
 a lack of urgency to tackle weak leadership at senior and middle levels
 insufficient challenge from governors and trustees who accepted
information from senior leaders without robust interrogation of its accuracy
 confusion over governance structures, reflected in the lack of clarity
around the roles and responsibilities of the central trust and the local
governing boards of constituent academies. This is not helped by some
trusts failing to meet the requirement to publish a scheme of delegation.

Given that the academies movement was initiated principally to improve the
performance of disadvantaged pupils, it is particularly concerning that many of the academies in these trusts are failing their poorest children. Findings from our recent focused inspections of AET and SPTA academies, for example, both show a gap of around 25 percentage points between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils attaining Level 4+ in reading, writing and mathematics for the group of academies that we inspected within each MAT. This compares with the national gap of 17 percentage points between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils.

Furthermore, as the SPTA letter that I am publishing today shows, disadvantaged pupils in SPTA academies are not making enough progress by the end of Key Stage4. In 2015, their progress in English was below that expected nationally in six SPT Aacademies and in 10 SPTA academies in mathematics. In AET secondary academies, the proportion of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress in English by the end of Key Stage 4 declined from 63% in 2014to 53% in 2015. Progress of disadvantaged pupils declined in English in 19 academies and in mathematics in 12 academies.5

In E-ACT academies, the gap in achievement of disadvantaged pupils and their
peers nationally continues to be too wide. In eight of 11 secondary schools in EACT where Key Stage 4 data were available, the percentage of disadvantaged
pupils making expected progress in mathematics by the end of Key Stage 4 remains below the national expected progress figure of 49.6%.

Given these worrying findings about the performance of disadvantaged pupils and the lack of leadership capacity and strategic oversight by trustees, salary levels for the chief executives of some of these MATs do not appear to be commensurate with the level of performance of their trusts or constituent academies. The average pay of the chief executives in these seven trusts is higher than the Prime Minister’s salary, with one chief executive’s salary reaching £225k. This poor use of public money is compounded by some trusts holding very largecash reserves that are not being spent on raising standards. For example, at the end of August 2015, these seven trusts had total cash in the bank of £111 million.

Furthermore, some of these trusts are spending money on expensive consultants or advisers to compensate for deficits in leadership. Put together, these seven trusts spent at least £8.5 million on education consultancy in 2014/15 alone.

Monitoring a large number of academies across different parts of the country
presents a considerable challenge. Given the lack of leadership capacity and the
ineffective monitoring of individual academies in these trusts, it is surprising that some continue to operate over such wide geographical areas. For example, in the three most recent MATs that HMI have reviewed:

 SPTA has 46 academies in 11 local authorities
 E-ACT has 23 academies in 10 local authorities
 AET has 67 academies in 28 local authorities."

Link to the full letter here:

www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/506718/HMCI__advice__note_MAT_inspections____10_March_2016.pdf

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 11:48

Making sure that posts on similar issues don't go live at EOP on Fridays is a good suggestion - wewere expecting this one on Thursday in fact, but there was a delay.

Apologies for coming back to this HQ - you might be interested to know that the DfE have got a bit of a reputation for making public statements last thing on a Friday; so much so, that some of the organisations which support the Education Sector are considering rescheduled their weekly e-newsletter publications in order to ensure their members don't receive the info a week later.

I suspect the 'delay' was entirely deliberate and something you may want to consider when seeking future guests posts from Government Departments. Wink

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 11:54

Thanks biddy - that's very damning against the Trusts which were inspected.

Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 12:00

MNHQ

nearly noon and hope you have sent a formal demand for data by now from Nocky Morgan's office.

Pretty
Your job description is nearly exactly what I thought it would be. Funny isn't it?

We spend so much time on debating things that actually have been debated elsewhere ages ago. Whatever happened to all the brilliant academics of Cambridge/Oxford/UCL/Imperial etc? We have enough academics there who can give "consultancy" there rather than people like you Pretty. I don't trust anyone who trusts Nicky Morgan's post above is worth a strong debate in its current form hence demanding data from her office.
Probably time for people like you to disappear if teaching and teachers as a profession is given the due respect and salaries they deserve.

Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 12:08

Pretty

" but some would say that risks have to be taken to succeed"
" I operate within the boundaries that are set nationally, I've no interest in setting them myself!"

It's not a novel you are trying to write. It's the future of my DCs you are talking about when you talk so indifferently about "risks".
And of course you operate within the boundaries set nationally blah blah. Nice to have the changes brought on nationally now isn't it? Sounds like a big consensus among the democratically elected politicians of Tories, right?
People like you can justify anything I think. Just need to twist the words. There is no solid argument no facts and figures. Just a lot of posts high on the adrenaline of "risks". Thanks for the time and thanks for keeping the fruitful discussion going.

biddy53 · 21/03/2016 12:09

We spend so much time on debating things that actually have been debated elsewhere ages ago. Whatever happened to all the brilliant academics of Cambridge/Oxford/UCL/Imperial etc? We have enough academics there who can give "consultancy

The trouble is their research is either ignored if it doesn't suit or twisted to fit in with political ideology. I am studying for an education related MA at one of the above - some of my lecturers have been involved in writing government reports and then are devastated when their findings are manipulated to fit government policy rather than government policy being based on robust research evidence.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 12:16

some of my lecturers have been involved in writing government reports and then are devastated when their findings are manipulated to fit government policy rather than government policy being based on robust research evidence.

All the while we have a state-funded education system, it will be politically controlled, and politicians are not, on the whole, philanthropically motivated.

Often, the recommendations of the experts are discounted because they would be vote losers - I've certainly seen that at a local level. Not necessarily the case here, although given that it was no secret that this government wanted to academise all schools, I'm surprised the majority was a large as it was at the last election.

Kizzyblack1 · 21/03/2016 12:17

I am so grateful to see all the positive support for teachers on this site! It is so good to see that mums understand that we want to to the best for our pupils (as well as our own children) and that recent government initiatives aren't helping us to focus on the needs of the children we teach. I cannot see how enforced academy conversions are going to help me deliver better teaching to my class or provide them with better pastoral care.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 12:19

valentine I'm not sure what your problem with me is personally - why the snide remarks ?
This isn't personal - and as I have said, I have DCs in the system to.

Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 12:24

Pretty

Politicians however are motivated by the fact they need our votes hence the reason democracy actually exists. Taking your argument, we might as well give all the national (stated owned hence public owned ) assets to the private sector "philanthropists" (who are accountable to whom exactly???), and get done with it?
And for that matter, let's do away with the democracy too while we can. No need to have politically motivated people running the country whichever way they like. We better hire technocrats (like you ) for each and every posts who should be ...err elected again or what? Appointed by the Army or the Queen? Or the UN?

What do you want to do away with?

Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 12:27

It's not personal. Sorry for the cross post. I am just angry on the fact that you are trying to keep ignoring the discussion and are talking like the politicians who you seem to be trying to oppose at the same time. Can't get my head around that kind of contradictory comments.
I really apologise if it sounded personal. I have a problem with the way you you are defending your argument. I really do t have any problem with you. So apologies if it felt so. X

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 12:28

Politicians however are motivated by the fact they need our votes hence the reason democracy actually exists

What if, as has happened in the past both locally and nationally, the advice of experts would be unpopular with the electorate?

What do you want to do away with?

Um, nothing?

Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 12:30

Kizzyblack

In my eyes, just as a happy mum equals happy children, happy teachers equal happy students. You teachers are the pillars we should be strengthening.
Time for the third cup of tea. I am worried.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 21/03/2016 12:30

Another x-post, thanks.

I appreciate my position may seem contradictory. I'm not ignoring debate, I just see things from a different perspective, apparently!

Valentine2 · 21/03/2016 12:37

Pretty
See, public is not stupid. If the opinion of those experts is unpopular with the electorate, it is time for a national debate to develop a consensus. And to help people understand. Afterall, if you can't explain your plan (if it's based on solid data) to parents, how do you expect them to agree with it?
Nicky Morgan might as well have a solid plan actually, to me it does not exists because I have not seen it as she did not bother to show it. It's not rcket science that the majority won't get it? It's just plain old maths and ratios and percentages she will need to show.
You will be hard pushed to find anyone right now who has something positive to say about this plan.

BridgetChapman · 21/03/2016 12:44

Dear Mumsnetters,
This is my first ever post. I'm a teacher and was completely devastated by the government's recent announcement over the forced academisation of all schools. I cannot tell you how much your responses to Nicky Morgan's post on here have cheered me up. It's so great to know that parents feel the same way as myself and other campaigners on this issue. My petition asking for a public inquiry into academies recently raced past 100,000 signatures in just four days. Can I ask that you consider signing and sharing it? The link is here: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/124747
Thanks so much for all your support. I know for a fact that this thread has been a real morale booster for my fellow teachers.
Bridget x

Swipe left for the next trending thread