Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Jux · 20/03/2016 13:27

Ridiculous.

Parent Portal? What about all those places without cable internet? I live in a TOWN only a few miles from Exeter. Exeter is cabled. We are not, nor are there any plans to do it.

I've got a decent phone line so we're OK. We have WiFi, but it's slow and uncertain, and we have to reset our router many times a day. My friend lives in a village a few miles further out. She is lucky if she gets phone connection despite being able to see the mast. Even the phone line can be uncertain. The WiFi they get there is stupidly slow with so many time-outs that she can spend an hour just to get onto Moodle for her children's school. I tried to upgrade her machine to W10, and after 3 weeks of leaving it to download, I took her laptop home with me and did it there.

Most people in my town don't even have a computer. Don't tell them to use the library either. There are far too many people using the library computers for job searches to avoid sanctions.....

PrettyBrightFireflies · 20/03/2016 13:29

I can understand the argument that Wth all schools academies, it will be harder for Academies to select and exclude in the way they do now.

At the moment, Parents have the option of LA schools for their DCs. When all schools are academies, the legislation will still place responsibility with the LA, and enforcement applied by the LA regarding SEND will have to be more robust as they will not have the backup plan of one of their own schools.

LumpySpacedPrincess · 20/03/2016 13:32

Who has to set up and run the parent portal? It will be just something else for teachers and ta's to do.

How dare the government do this, they are utterly vile forcing their ideology onto us. Thanks again tory voters. Sad

noblegiraffe · 20/03/2016 13:37

Large-scale Government IT projects are doomed to failure.

What would be on this parent portal anyway that isn't already on the DfE website for each school?

biddy53 · 20/03/2016 13:39

...it will be harder for Academies to select and exclude in the way they do now.

So basically you admit they've acted unfairly (possibly illegally) but think we should push ahead with this model anyway. How sad for all of us that there are people who care so little about the vulnerable in society - I will disengage before I say something I regret.

Devilishpyjamas · 20/03/2016 13:43

There is a local government ombudsmen for complaints to do with the LA. It can be quite helpful ime - once a formal complaint gets to stage 2 they start listening & make changes.

God knows what would happen once it's all carved up.

Devilishpyjamas · 20/03/2016 13:46

Pretty - how will it be harder for academies to exclude children with SEN just because everyone else is one? It will just mean tricky children end up with no school.

houseHuntinginmanchester · 20/03/2016 14:01

Signed and shared.

GingerIvy · 20/03/2016 14:07

At the moment, Parents have the option of LA schools for their DCs. When all schools are academies, the legislation will still place responsibility with the LA, and enforcement applied by the LA regarding SEND will have to be more robust as they will not have the backup plan of one of their own schools.

They will not have the backup plan of one of their own schools??? So essentially the LA schools were the dumping grounds? And you want people to place their trust in academies that felt that was okay?

If academies are excluding children with SEN now, they will continue to do so. The fact that the government didn't plant feet and say "No, you cannot exclude these children" and force them to provide better support says a lot. The fact that parents of children with SEN have to fight an ongoing battle, most often for years, to get their children supported and placed in the appropriate school... well, that says a lot too. What is says is that the government doesn't want to spend money on support for children with SEN in school. They seem to be now putting forth the idea that they don't like home education either. I don't like the direction this is going at all.

PosieReturningParker · 20/03/2016 14:09

Just marking my place.

I think before I read this sham of a ministers post is going to be patronising and dishonest.

PosieReturningParker · 20/03/2016 14:10

Never in the same room

Exactly the same contempt for poor people.

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"
Badders123 · 20/03/2016 14:15

Signed
Your guest post is simply vacuous, patronising bollocks

Jux · 20/03/2016 14:17

Signed some 20 minutes ago. Haven't got the email for validation yet though. How can an automated response take so long? Only the Civil Service have systems which are so incompetent.

antiqueroadhoe · 20/03/2016 14:37

I'd love to think the results of this petition would be considered rather than shredded into the recycle bin. But I suspect it will be totally ignored.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 20/03/2016 14:42

The fact that the government didn't plant feet and say "No, you cannot exclude these children" and force them to provide better support says a lot.

The "government" have delegated responsibility for "planting feet" to the LAs over this matter. I agree, the LAs have been crap at enforcement, have not challenged the Academies and have instead appeased parents by providing the DC with education directly.

Devilishpyjamas · 20/03/2016 14:47

ProvidIng an education is hardly 'appeasing parents' - LA's gave a Duty to provide an education. If they can't force an academy to do so of course they will provide an education in a school they can.

cejay · 20/03/2016 14:50

"We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that."
No it does not. It puts trust into the hands of head teachers and the owners of multi academy chains. A recent advert for one such leader announced that ‘no teaching experience was necessary’. Furthermore, a head teacher is not infallible. Many news items in recent years have highlighted heads cooking the books, appointing friends to high positions and employing partner companies to provide ‘essential’ services such as overpriced ‘consultancy’ work.
"It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. "
Wrong again. You want to remove parents from the governing bodies. If the parents don’t speak for the community then who does? Why this sinister move? Secondly, who has oversight of all school places in the area? If there are school shortages and the Local Authority has no control over education, then how can they plan for change in terms of numbers?
"I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils"
Vague. How do you hold a failing academy to account? Close it down? Open it again? Send in Ofsted? Schools are already held to account very rigorously and it doesn’t seem to have raised standards across the board.
"We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years"
Unbelievable! You want to remove parent governors and replace it with an online portal. Have tried not to include my own experience of my local secondary academy but I feel I must say at this point that my own children’s school went into meltdown. Massive staff exodus and financial mismanagement from a corrupt head. It was the parent governors who called a parents’ forum and the Local Authority came to the support of the school in helping them through the transition to getting new leadership. I dread to think what would happen if you removed the parent governors.
"I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands "
This phrase is, frankly, an insult to all the parents nationwide, who have protested against the forced conversion of their school to academy status and been ignored.
"we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed"
This is open to debate. Many expert educationalists question your narrowing of the curriculum so that everything can be tested by a very specific test. Parents of primary children know this only too well. Come on Nicky…the subjunctive? Wouldn't a love of reading be a better start?
"Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life"
Call me cynical but I believe your goal is to keep your donors happy by handing them huge swathes of land and property which belong to us - the taxpayers. You want to reduce the cost of education by cutting pay and conditions for teachers, employing unqualified staff with little regard for the professionalism of teachers or the wishes of parents.
Michael Gove once called teachers ‘the enemies of promise’ – I fear that the Tories are now the enemies of democracy.

Rogers3456 · 20/03/2016 14:51

Another petition but crucial in maintaining a broad and balanced curriculum for all.petition.parliament.uk/petitions/111731

PrettyBrightFireflies · 20/03/2016 14:55

If they can't force an academy to do so of course they will provide an education in a school they can.

But the current legislation places responsibility for "local offer" with the LA; they may be choosing not to force Academies to provide the education, but the legislation is place to allow them to.

At the moment, the LAs are taking the path of least resistance and not challenging Academies - if all schools are academies, then they will have no choice but to challenge.

curluponthesofa · 20/03/2016 15:07

Because a lot of the data stating that our standards are falling compared to other countries has been discredited
It may well have been, but that's not going to help the young people leaving our education system who will be judged by employers based on the country in which they were educated. The Government can either spend time and money discrediting the international league tables, or it can try and improve the countries performance within them.

Pretty, I don't understand your logic here. Are you saying that employers in this country prefer candidates from abroad because of the education systems in their home country? If so where is the evidence of this?
And why shouldn't the international league tables be challenged if they are incorrect? I don't understand why our whole education system has to be turned upside down at a cost of millions because of one incorrect report...

I disagree that Academisation will improve standards anyway. Judging by the ridiculous grammar rules the government are forcing through at the moment (which are ridiculed by linguists and authors), the DfE really have no idea what they are doing. I have no faith in their expertise. Do businesses really want employees who have spent their primary education being drilled and tested on subordinate clauses and the appropriate use of exclamation marks to the point where they are scared to write anything at all; or would they rather have employees who have been taught to think creatively, to problem solve, to be open minded?

Pretty, a question, do you work in the education system by the way? Just from some of your posts that is the impression I get.

Rogers3456 · 20/03/2016 15:12

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/111731

Devilishpyjamas · 20/03/2016 15:13

The local offer has nothing to do with forcing academies to take children with SEN - it's information about what is available.

I am guessing you have limited experience of SN pretty.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 20/03/2016 15:13

Are you saying that employers in this country prefer candidates from abroad because of the education systems in their home country?

I'm saying that when international companies are seeking to establish new businesses, they look at the quality of education of their potential workforce when they decide which country to establish that business.

It would take £billions for the Government to establish a new ranking system of education systems worldwide and promote that to corporations as the one to use - one already exists, even though it has been discredited by some, it is still available and trusted by many.

MrsDeVere · 20/03/2016 15:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ElementaryMyDear · 20/03/2016 15:20

I can understand the argument that Wth all schools academies, it will be harder for Academies to select and exclude in the way they do now. At the moment, Parents have the option of LA schools for their DCs. When all schools are academies, the legislation will still place responsibility with the LA, and enforcement applied by the LA regarding SEND will have to be more robust as they will not have the backup plan of one of their own schools.

If a child with SEN is permanently excluded, no LA can override that, no matter how robust they are. The best they can do is go through the process of amending the child's statement or EHC Plan to name another school, but for that purpose they have to consult other schools and there is inevitably a delay whilst they do so, and that will be exacerbated if all the local schools are academies that don't want to take the child in question. And if they force an academy to take a child, frankly experience shows that it's only a matter of time before the child is excluded again. It's an absolutely disastrous scenario for children who are already at a significant disadvantage.