Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Guest post: Nicky Morgan - "Why academisation is best for our schools"

999 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 18/03/2016 17:09

As parents, we all want the best for our children. We want to make sure they have access to the best opportunities and to help them grow up into well-rounded adults. Making sure that our children have a high quality education is a key part of that.

I want to outline exactly what academisation means and why I truly believe this is the best way forward for our schools. Our children only have one shot at receiving the best education and I am committed to ensuring this happens as swiftly as possible.

We need to put our trust into the hands of the people that know best how to run our schools - the teachers - and the academy system does just that. tells you more about what an academy is. It gives schools greater autonomy to make the decisions that are right for their community and pupils. After all, we have the finest generation of teachers ever and being part of an academy helps put the power back in their hands.

The most recent results show that the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level in reading, writing and maths at the end of Key Stage 2 in primary academies has risen by 4%, from 67% in 2014 to 71% in 2015. Additionally, when it comes to secondary, it's a similar story with converter academies which are performing 7.2% above the national average, with 64.3% of pupils achieving five good GCSEs.

However, a dynamic school system where all schools are academies is just one part of a much wider plan to improve our education system which I set out yesterday in our white paper.

It is every parent's right to know their child is in an excellent school no matter where in the country they live. I am confident that this move will guarantee a higher school standard with each academy held to account for the performance of their pupils.

Ultimately, I am committed to making it easier for you as a parent to play an even more active role in your child's education. In essence, I want to put young people and parents first – something that might sound obvious, but the truth is that for too long parents have been an afterthought in our education system. We want you as parents to have a much stronger voice in what happens to your child during their school years, because we know that you want the very best for your child.

So how are we doing that? Firstly, I am well aware that the education system can appear complex to many parents. I am dedicated to changing this once and for all, and putting the control firmly back in your hands. As a result of this, I plan to introduce a new, online Parents Portal from as early as next year. This portal will enable parents' access to key information and allow you to support your child's learning.

Alongside this, we have changed the curriculum and the way that students will be assessed. This will help to raise standards and make sure that your child leaves school with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. It is imperative that every child fulfils their potential, and this includes stretching the most able pupils.

More young people will also study the EBacc - a combination of maths, English, two sciences, a humanity and a language - up to the age of 16. And the exams and qualifications young people are awarded will set a new international gold standard that is respected by employers, helping them to succeed in our increasingly global world.

I am a firm believer that an exceptional education transforms children's futures and everything outlined in this White Paper is committed to ensuring that parents and pupils come first. Our goal must always be to ensure every single child leaves school with the best education and the opportunity to excel in adult life. I believe that together, we can achieve that goal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 10:12

Mandy they're listed in the link I just posted.
When I've got a few minutes, I'll check out each of the schools.

DramaQueenofHighCs · 19/03/2016 10:13

PrettyBright well those must have been specially selected teachers then as I know many and none of them agree with all these changes - absolutely none!! (There were a few who hated the old system, but they don't think this new one is any better!) Just because some 'teachers' and 'school staff' were involved does not prove they represented the majority!

I work as an LSA and am seriously worried about the impact these changes will have on my SEN students ... Indeed it was this duty of care to our schools high SEN and EAL intake that was one of the main reasons we did not become an academy when we had the chance a few years back. Plus we have an AMAZING head teacher, senior leadership and other staff - our school is like a family, even though we have around 800 students (high school) and many staff. I don't see how becoming an academy could improve on that!
I fear for my 7 year old DS - he is a very bright kid who loves Maths and Science but also adores music and drama - I would hate for him to not have the opertunity to study the arts to a higher level if he wants to!
I myself was a bright(ish) student who excelled in English (literature though so I bet NM and her team are probably against that too - oh yes, it seems they are!!) and Science but lived for the arts - without having acess to music in abundance at my school I probably would've comittee suicide in my teens!! I'm not afraid to say that for Nicky and her 'advisors' (and let's face it I feel a little sorry for Nicky as she is really only the figure head here - anyone whose watched 'Yes Minister' knows how government is run,) as I'm sure I'm not the only person who owes their life and/or sanity to being able to study arts subjects at school! They are a break from endless rounds of textbooks and writing and also essential, yes essential (whether it be music, drama, art or other creative subjects) for personal, social and emotional development... Not that the government care about bringing up well rounded, kind, polite, emotionaly balanced children so long as they can all manage trigonometry, spell complicated words, know the periodic table backwards and can spell chrysanthemum - who cares if they are so stressed out they end up on medication or receiving therapy for stress before their 20's!! Hmm

I'd love to invite Nicky and her team to actually spend time in schools - to take a tour and visit lots of different schools spending a week or so in each and actually talk to and listen to staff, students and parents alike- and then tell us how these new rules will "improve" our education system!!

MsColouring · 19/03/2016 10:16

Prettybrightfireflies - that is a link to an article published in 2011 about the review - not the new curriculum itself. It is not clear from that article that the quoted HTs were actually involved in the review - just in support of it.

I'm not sure what your agenda is here.

DramaQueenofHighCs · 19/03/2016 10:20

PrettyBright - funny there is nobody from the quoted HTs speaking out against it isn't it! You don't maybe think they 'picked and chose' who they quoted? You really think they would've quoted those who spoke out against it?? It's a government site - how nieve can you be?

Alfieisnoisy · 19/03/2016 10:26

I have been watching cuts in the education budget over the past few years. Tbis and the convern over academisation is what finally persuaded me to get my autistic child out of mainstream education. I was right to do so.

Meeep · 19/03/2016 10:30

How do you sleep at night Nicky Morgan? Shame on you.

lljkk · 19/03/2016 10:31

Would admissions still be done on a single simple application to a central authority in the area (like county council)? Who would have responsibility for making sure that every pupil got a place somewhere within the area schools?

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 10:34

The new curriculum that was launched in 2014 was developed from the Review that took place in 2011/12.
The document that the Review Team produced (the team that included all those people listed in the press release from the DfE) included recommendations for changes to the curriculum which were then consulted on and commentary invited from teachers and other professionals.

Contrary to popular opinion, the new curriculum was not rustled up on the back of a fag packet by some ministers and their cronies one Friday in the House of Commons bar.
Teachers and professionals were involved and invited to contribute.

My agenda is to ensure that the voices of indignation of teachers now is balanced with the knowledge that not all teachers agree, and that there were teachers involved in the process. As a parent, which teachers should I believe?

heavenlypink · 19/03/2016 10:37

Petition signed and shared

spanieleyes · 19/03/2016 10:41

There are NO teachers on the review list.

DramaQueenofHighCs · 19/03/2016 10:41

PrettyBright as a parent you should do just as you are doing - your research. You should take both arguments with a pinch of salt and weigh them against each other. But also remember that teachers may have been consulted about the curriculum - it doesn't mean they were listened to! I am just off but I will be doing my research on the schools that took part in the new curriculum desicions but so far (to be fair I've only looked at 3 of them) can find none equivalent to the school I work in!

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 10:43

spaniel - are HT no longer considered teachers?

"The advisory committee will support the Department for Education in the conduct of the review by helping to frame recommendations, offering a wider perspective on the proposals from the expert panel and providing advice on strategic and cross-cutting issues that may arise from the review.
The committee will consist of the following members:
Jon Coles, Chair of the advisory committee (Director-General for Education Standards, Department for Education)
Tim Oates (Chair of the expert panel and Director of Assessment Research and Development, Cambridge Assessment)
Shahed Ahmed (Head of Elmhurst Primary School, Forest Gate)
Peter Barnes (Head of Oakgrove School, Milton Keynes)
Dame Yasmin Bevan (Executive Principal and Head of Denbigh High School and Challney High School for Boys, Luton)
Mike Harris (Head of Education and Skills Policy at the Institute of Directors)
Patrick Leeson (Director of Education and Care, Ofsted)
John D. F. Martin (Head of Castle Hill Junior School, Basingstoke)
Bernice McCabe (Head of North London Collegiate)
John McIntosh OBE (retired Head of the London Oratory School)
Ruth Miskin (Founder, Read Write Inc and former Primary Head)
Joe Prendergast (Head of Wennington Hall School, Lancaster)
Heather Rockhold (retired Head of Lauriston Primary School, Hackney)
Professor Nigel Thrift (Vice-Chancellor, University of Warwick)
Sir Michael Wilshaw (Head of Mossbourne Community Academy, Hackney, and Director of Education at ARK)
The expert panel will lead on the construction and content of the new national curriculum. The panel will develop a robust evidence base to inform the drafting of new programmes of study, and build a detailed framework for the national curriculum taking account of the requirements set by the highest performing international jurisdictions. It will also reflect the views of teachers, subject communities, academics, employers, higher education institutions and other interested parties.
The expert panel will consist of the following members:
Tim Oates, Chair of the Expert Panel (Director of Assessment Research and Development, Cambridge Assessment)
Professor Mary James (Associate Director of Research in the Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge)
Professor Andrew Pollard (Professor of Education at the Department of Quantitative Social Science, Institute of Education, and Director of ESCalate at the Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol)
Professor Dylan Wiliam (formerly a Deputy Director at the Institute of Education and Professor of Educational Assessment) "

SunnySomer · 19/03/2016 10:46

"Involved in the process" actually means very, very little I'm afraid. Ideas that seem great at the beginning - if implemented within sensible timescales, to an appropriate degree, in an appropriate way etc - can be utterly distorted and contorted by ministerial working parties until what you thought you'd agreed at the outset is rendered unrecognisable.
(Long term civil servant here).
My former MP was a cabinet colleague of Michael Gove and said he witnessed him personally amended the history curriculum. That is not the job of a SoS.

MsColouring · 19/03/2016 10:49

A handful of teachers were involved in the development of the new national curriculum. No-one's suggested it was rustled up on a fag packet but it has not been properly tested and evaluated before being imposed on schools so our children are all guinea pigs.

Pretty - I think you will find that the majority of teachers agree that NC 2014 is a bit of a mess. Fortunately, most teachers are doing their best to make the best of a bad situation and there are some fantastic resources being produced by experts to support teachers in doing this. It doesn't change the fact that most experts know that standards are too high for most children.

spanieleyes · 19/03/2016 10:49

Very few Head teachers actually teach any more!
The expert panel had no-one on it who taught at all!
The views of teachers were asked for and then ignored.

janet1789 · 19/03/2016 11:04

Two of the best state schools schools (and well known) in North Yorkshire are not academies and have never expressed any wish to be..says it all really

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 11:13

The views of teachers were asked for and then ignored.

That was why I asked if any of the HT or other professionals on the panel had subsequently spoken out publicly against the Curriculum as it now stands.
There were 10 HT or former HT on the panel, all with extensive teaching experience. Why have none of them spoken out against it?

tangerinesarenottheonlyfruit · 19/03/2016 11:18

PrettyBrightFireflies did you miss my question - are you / do you work for Nicky Morgan?

marnie22 · 19/03/2016 11:18

Exactly! Parents have virtually no power already at academies, our local academy clearly loathes the parents and briefs all staff against those who complain about the most shocking abuses of staff power at the school - not that we're allowed to call it a school - it's Mossbourne Community Academy, part of the Mossbourne Federation, and children are students to be disciplined, corralled, patronised and humiliated. Parents roundly ignored or patronised too. The parent-governerors are not much use as they buy into the ethos of the academy system anyway, but better than nothing.

MsColouring · 19/03/2016 11:20

10 isn't that many to represent our whole education system.

Anyway, you're obviously convinced that teachers are moaning about nothing and determined to ignore those in the know pretty.

I suggest that you go and start an 'AiBU to suggest that teachers are a right lot of whinging idiots to moan about this new curriculum when they were fully consulted on the process.' As that seems to be what you fully believe.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 11:20

did you miss my question

No I didn't miss your question. Did you miss my reply?

RufusTheReindeer · 19/03/2016 11:21

I know its not personal but i am getting a bit of a complex

Had three children born in a "free university" Britain...now we need to help them finacially as they can't even get loans to cover their living expenses

Fair enough...not ecstatic about the change but ok

Now we are going to have to pay for future grandchildren to go private Hmm may emigrate...

And loads of parents and grandparents having the same worries

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 11:26

, you're obviously convinced that teachers are moaning about nothing and determined to ignore those in the know

Not at all. I'm not convinced that academisation is the right solution to the problem; I'm sure it's not the only solution - but it strikes me that this was entirely predictable.
It's a political, ideologically-driven change that fits with the overall government agenda.

What I'm surprised about is the strength of feeling now. If LAs are so crucial to our schooling system them why hasn't there been outcry before now? They've been increasingly sidelined in favour of an open market for years.
I get the impression that many people in the profession have taken their eye off the strategic framework they work within and now they've realised what's happening, it's too late!

marnie22 · 19/03/2016 11:29

Why is Sir Michael Wilshaw listed as head of Mossbourne when he left years ago to become chief inspector of education with Ofsted? Head of Mossbourne is an Australian former military man who goes about with a shaven head, reflective sunglasses, drives an electric silver Porsche (chargers are installed at both secondary schools for his sole use) and is one of the most inarticulate speakers I have ever heard. A dangerous fool on a mission.

PrettyBrightFireflies · 19/03/2016 11:30

Why is Sir Michael Wilshaw listed as head of Mossbourne when he left years ago to become chief inspector of education with Ofsted?

Because the committee to review the curriculum was formed in 2011 - and that is the list of committee members at the time.