"It's good that you have found the exception jim. I have a friend who attends the NAGC meetings, she confirmed that most of the children there were unable to hold a conversation because they were off the planet. '
You see I think here is the problem. MOst of the parents who attend the NAGTY are off the planet. There are plenty of very clever kids out there who have parents who don't go along to that sort of thing (you don't have to be scarily bright to get into NAGTY) who also have very good social skills etc etc.
The brightest person I know (top first in his year at Oxford and he stopped revising 2 weeks before the exams) grew up without NAGTY, without google, without a car in fact (so he couldn't get to lots of stimulating meetings very easily as he lived in the middle of nowhere). He published his first paper aged 14 and is well adjusted socially. I don't buy that academic giftedness has to go hand in hand with social ineptitude. And I think it's dangerous to think it does. Separate the 2 out.
Nor do I think that 'he's so clever that he's bored' is a very good excuse for poor work ethic. It's not that hard to stimulate a child- even a very clever one- especially these days with so much easy access to academically stimulating stuff - to be academically stimulated all you really need is to be able to read. If they can't concentrate or apply themselves then yes its a problem- but it's exactly the same problem as Joe Average who can't concentrate and apply himself and for both the result will be the same (they won't get the list of qualifications they need to demonstrate how clever they are). Being unable to work is nothing to do with being gifted and talented though. A big part of academic success is being able to study independently/be self-motivated, not need spoon feeding. In which case a computer and even better a library and a truly gifted child should be well away.