Thanks Iggly2.
In my experience, (which is a lot more than I would have wished for) High achieving schools in the state sector often have lots ofbright, but not necessarily gifted children and there is a huge difference between bright children and gifted children. Note one is not better than the other, just vastly different.
Gifted kids are totally different in all they do and they learn in a different way. The schools tend to lump all the children together and you hear a lot of, "We have lots of bright children here".
Yes you do, but that does not mean you can meet the needs of a child who thinks outside the box and push the square peg into the round hole.
High achieving schools, to me, teach a narrow curriculum and concentrate on getting all children to an acceptable level and not beyond. That is why they didn't work for me and ds.
However, there are lots of high achieving schools such as Westminster and Winchester that I would not like to put in that category. If a school can be flexible and confident enough to deviate from what they always do, then that would be the school for me!
Often non selective schools are far more prepared to treat a child as an individual as their selling points and emphasis tends to be on nuturing the whole child, not a narrow band of academic ability.