loon the scar of my microdisctectomy is tiny. I was expecting quite a big scar, and when I saw the dressing I thought it was big, then my nurse friend changed the dressing (I went to stay in a yurt 3 weeks after surgery), that's how good I felt immediately following surgery), she said it was 'this big' and showed me a tiny scar. I didn't believe her so she took a photo with her finger next to it and I was like
it's been one year and no issues with the muscles - they use a little mating which literally only cuts into the muscle needed, it's not pulled open, but goes straight down so the damage to the surrounding muscle is minimal. I watched a video of how it is done after it is done and I was surprised at how minimal it is. However, with fusion they can't do that, and I believe they can cut smaller from the front, and go straight in to the location, I guess due to being able to move bits and bobs about internally more easily that going through the muscle, and bone from the other side? But, either way it's not pleasant and I wish I was not so keen on knowing how things were done. I remember having a nose op when i was 18, had it re-broken and straightened after breaking it as a youngster - i sat watching a plastic surgery programme while I still had a plaster over my nose, watching how they do nose-jobs - with a mixture of horror and awe 
wft the retrolesthesis, it is usual to be as a result of impact injury and it fits with an injury I had a few years ago, which I didn't connect until a MNer asked me if it could be related (she remembered my thread about the injury occurring, then later posted on a thread about my back) and it dawned on me like a lightbulb that the disc prolapse and the injury could be connected. It was not until later that was confirmed as retrolesthesis, when the surgeon said he had spotted it on the MRI, asked if I had an injury, and we talked about this incident briefly. He said it was 'more than likely' the cause, that I had probably cracked and shifted the vertebrae and it healed itself, but he can't be sure as the damage was too long ago. His theory is the prolapse 'probably' (but again no certainty) was caused by the movement of the vertebrae, either at the time and made worse over time, or over time on it's own. But, basically, I won't really ever know for sure, other than the rest of my spine is/was fine.
wrt to second opinion. I got a letter from the 'central referral and booking team' or whoever they now are to say they cannot manage the referral as the neurosurgeon team in my area have weekly multi-disciplinary meetings relating to referrals and my case would be discussed and if a decision to refer me to outpatients is decided they would write directly. I am confused as a) I didn't want to be referred to my local hospital and this central booking system is meant to give me a choice and b) I am technically not discharged from outpatients yet. So I am expecting them to talk to Mr Consultant who is going to go 'eh? I told her to bugger off!' I have made an appt to speak to my GP about it, but that is 3 weeks away for a planned appt. I can see him on the day, but that feels cheeky as those appts are for people who have a medical need at that time, rather than to chat about referrals etc. I will probably telephone him instead as he makes time for those and it saves an appt slot for someone else. I want to ask him for my MRI report etc as he will probably get it before the neuro. I will read what it says then ask for my MRI scan on CD to look at.
I might, in order to just get a chance to discuss this in detail, pick the surgeon I want to talk to and pay to see him, armed with all the info I have. I just need to find that surgeon...