Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General election 2024

Turnout only around 52%

159 replies

Houseplanter · 05/07/2024 00:06

As far as I can tell? Goodness that's low. Almost half the population who is eligible haven't made their choice.

OP posts:
bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:43

Longma · 05/07/2024 07:41

You could have for free ID for the purpose. There has been adverts online, on all social media, threads in MN, adverts in TV and radio, etc advising about it.

But no one should have to get the ID. It was introduced cynically.

NoWordForFluffy · 05/07/2024 07:44

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:43

But no one should have to get the ID. It was introduced cynically.

They could get a postal vote then. No ID needed.

Khara · 05/07/2024 07:45

My Aussie sil is totally shocked by the turn-out. Voting is compulsory over there and she can't understand why it isn't here.

spriots · 05/07/2024 07:45

NoWordForFluffy · 05/07/2024 07:44

They could get a postal vote then. No ID needed.

Which, given that it was postal votes where the fraud was found not in person votes, just shows what a self serving decision it was to make this change

midgetastic · 05/07/2024 07:48

Some poeple in Scotland didn't get their postal votes before they went on holiday

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:48

NoWordForFluffy · 05/07/2024 07:44

They could get a postal vote then. No ID needed.

But people should not have to go around a cynical barrier to voting.

We had a functional system and the Conservatives cynically made it harder.

You do not want to accept the reality of how humans behave - but the truth is that some people decide to vote quite late in the campaign - the ID requirement is a barrier to that.

If you want higher turnout, put the vote back to the traditional British system.

SeriaMau · 05/07/2024 07:49

IDontHateRainbows · 05/07/2024 00:07

My choice was to not make a choice(vote).

It was intentional, I didn't want to vote for anyone.

Is that not a valid choice?

No. Spoil your ballot paper if you must, but at least turn up to show that you are not lazy committed.

crumblingschools · 05/07/2024 07:49

People have needed ID for the last local elections so had time to get something in place before now.

And if Conservatives were using it as a ploy to get more votes, it obviously worked well!

NoWordForFluffy · 05/07/2024 07:49

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:48

But people should not have to go around a cynical barrier to voting.

We had a functional system and the Conservatives cynically made it harder.

You do not want to accept the reality of how humans behave - but the truth is that some people decide to vote quite late in the campaign - the ID requirement is a barrier to that.

If you want higher turnout, put the vote back to the traditional British system.

You can lobby Labour to do that now they're in government.

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:50

Khara · 05/07/2024 07:45

My Aussie sil is totally shocked by the turn-out. Voting is compulsory over there and she can't understand why it isn't here.

Because that is our electoral system, as in many other democracies.

Compulsory voting is performative, not meaningful.

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:51

NoWordForFluffy · 05/07/2024 07:49

You can lobby Labour to do that now they're in government.

They have already made noises about reviewing it.

spikeandbuffy · 05/07/2024 07:51

Marmiteontoastgirlie · 05/07/2024 01:24

I’m not surprised, the UK doesn’t have a proportional voting system - why would you bother to vote if you live in a safe seat and don’t want to vote for the party holding it? Voter turnout in countries with proportional voting systems is consistently higher than non proportional voting systems because every vote actually counts.

I didn't vote
Went to and then couldn't find my driving license which is my only ID. I do live in an area that's been labour since 2000 so I really wasn't concerned my vote would make any difference at all
In fact I would have bet my wages on it staying Labour

SeriaMau · 05/07/2024 07:51

LiterallyOnFire · 05/07/2024 00:30

I can understand that TBH.

I voted for a socialist candidate which will have had exactly the same impact as your abstention. I can't see that there is a huge moral difference there.

Really?

MaryBeardsShoes · 05/07/2024 07:53

DragonFly98 · 05/07/2024 00:33

No, it's incredibly disrespectful, and women died for your right to vote.

Don’t be so stupid. No one ever says this bull shit to men.

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:53

crumblingschools · 05/07/2024 07:49

People have needed ID for the last local elections so had time to get something in place before now.

And if Conservatives were using it as a ploy to get more votes, it obviously worked well!

People move house. New people turn 18. People get married or divorced and need a name change.

Plus look at the differential turnout between local and national elections.

What is your justification for making it harder to vote? I understand why the Conservatives did it, but why do you support it?

spuddy4 · 05/07/2024 07:53

Khara · 05/07/2024 07:45

My Aussie sil is totally shocked by the turn-out. Voting is compulsory over there and she can't understand why it isn't here.

I can't see what you'd get out of compulsory voting. People would just tick any box to be done with it.

SeriaMau · 05/07/2024 07:54

ThisOldThang · 05/07/2024 01:12

If you spoil your ballot paper, you end up as part of the turnout - e.g. 'Labour won the election with an 80% turnout'.

Politicians use turnout as endorsement.

Not voting is a more powerful way to withdraw your support because, for example, winning an election with only a 20% turnout is meaningless in terms of public support.

(I voted)

But they still win. And a tiny minority will govern. And a huge majority will moan.

PoppyCherryDog · 05/07/2024 07:55

DragonFly98 · 05/07/2024 00:33

No, it's incredibly disrespectful, and women died for your right to vote.

This. I will always vote for this reason.

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:55

spuddy4 · 05/07/2024 07:53

I can't see what you'd get out of compulsory voting. People would just tick any box to be done with it.

This is exactly what does happen. It does not increase engagement.

Those who do not want to vote are best left not to vote, rather than force them to make a random selection.

What needs to happen is to make it worth voting for more people.

AbstemiousBreakfast · 05/07/2024 07:56

IDontHateRainbows · 05/07/2024 00:07

My choice was to not make a choice(vote).

It was intentional, I didn't want to vote for anyone.

Is that not a valid choice?

But how could you look at what the the candidates and parties were saying, and not be able to discriminate between them at all? I appreciate that no candidate or party is perfect, but life is complicated - why would you disenfranchise yourself?

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 07:59

Stride won by 61. Holden won by 20. How many were turned away in those constituencies? Plus importantly we have no numbers on those who didn't even attempt to vote because they knew they had no ID.

SeriaMau · 05/07/2024 08:00

Mrsdyna · 05/07/2024 06:20

What's the point of voting when we have the FPTP system in a safe seat?

And you say this after last nights result? Wow!

bergamotorange · 05/07/2024 08:01

AbstemiousBreakfast · 05/07/2024 07:56

But how could you look at what the the candidates and parties were saying, and not be able to discriminate between them at all? I appreciate that no candidate or party is perfect, but life is complicated - why would you disenfranchise yourself?

They already said - they did not want to vote for any of the choices on offer.

People approach things differently.

SeriaMau · 05/07/2024 08:01

MaryBeardsShoes · 05/07/2024 07:53

Don’t be so stupid. No one ever says this bull shit to men.

Read about the Chartists. Educate yourself on Suffrage.

crumblingschools · 05/07/2024 08:03

@bergamotorange many more just don’t bother to vote than the ones who don’t have ID.